4006-776-356 出国就医服务电话

免费获得国外相关药品,最快 1 个工作日回馈药物信息

出境医 / 临床实验 / Mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection in Conjunction With Pulmonary Metastasectomy From Colorectal Cancer

Mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection in Conjunction With Pulmonary Metastasectomy From Colorectal Cancer

Study Description
Brief Summary:
To study whether or not total mediastinal lymph node dissection in conjunction with pulmonary metastasectomy from colorectal cancer is associated with improved survival compared to pulmonary metastasectomy only.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Lung Neoplasms Neoplasm Metastasis Colorectal Cancer Procedure: Total mediastinal lymph node dissection and pulmonary metastasectomy Procedure: Only pulmonary metastasectomy Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

The question of lymph node sampling and/or involvement in pulmonary metastasectomy remains controversial. The performance of lymph node dissection during pulmonary metastasectomy is infrequent and varies between institutions. Of all the patients in The International Registry of Lung Metastases only 4,6% of patients underwent lymph node dissection. In a recent survey by Internullo and colleagues amongst the members of European Society of Thoracic Surgeons 55% perform mediastinal lymph node sampling whereas 33% perform no nodal sampling at all. The rate of lymph node involvement varies between primary tumours.

Several studies from groups that systematically perform mediastinal lymph node dissection in conjunction with pulmonary metastasectomy have been published and in all studies the presence of lymph node metastasis emerges as an ominous prognostic factor. Ercan and colleagues found a 3-year survival of 69% for patients without lymph node involvement versus 38% in patients with positive lymph nodes. Saito and colleagues reported a 5-year survival of 53,6 for patients without hilar or mediastinal node involvement versus 6,2% at 4 years for patients with positive nodes. Bölükbas and colleagues reported a 5-year survival of 59% for patients without lymph node involvement in contrast to 23% for patients with lymph node involvement.

The rate of lymph node involvement is reported between 20-43% and risk factors for lymph node involvement include 2 or more metastases, prior liver metastases, rectum cancer and size of metastases .

Most of the above mentioned authors are in favor of mediastinal lymphadenectomy but also stress that the evidence available is not solid enough to make firm recommendations. In conclusion the literature is quite limited and of low-level evidence.

In remains unclear whether the complete removal of mediastinal lymph nodes is associated with a survival benefit or merely allows for a more accurate postoperative staging and guidance for additional oncological treatment. Thus, the aim of the following proposed study is to examine whether or not systemic lymph node dissection during pulmonary metastasectomy is associated with a survival benefit.

Hypothesis:

  1. Systemic mediastinal lymphadenectomy during pulmonary metastasectomy with curative intent for colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is feasible and safe.
  2. Systemic mediastinal lymphadenectomy during pulmonary metastasectomy with curative intent for CRC is associated with improved survival compared to only pulmonary metastasectomy.

Design:

Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. No lymph node dissection versus systemic mediastinal lymph node dissection with en-bloc resection of lymph nodes and fatty tissue in station 2,4,7,8, 9 and 10 on the right side and 5,6,7,8, 9 and 10 on the left side during pulmonary metastasectomy for CRC.

Study Design
Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 200 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Total Mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection in Pulmonary Metastasectomy From Colorectal Cancer - a Randomized, Controlled Trial
Study Start Date : October 2015
Estimated Primary Completion Date : October 2018
Estimated Study Completion Date : October 2022
Arms and Interventions
Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Lymph node dissection and pulmonary metastasectomy
Total mediastinal lymph node dissection and pulmonary metastasectomy from colorectal cancer
Procedure: Total mediastinal lymph node dissection and pulmonary metastasectomy
Total mediastinal lymph node dissection where all lymph nodes and fatty tissues is removed conjunction with pulmonary metastasectomy

Active Comparator: Pulmonary metastasectomy only
Only pulmonary metastasectomy from colorectal cancer
Procedure: Only pulmonary metastasectomy
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. 5-year overall survival [ Time Frame: 7-8 years ]

Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. 1-year overall survival [ Time Frame: 3-4 years ]
  2. 3-year overall survival [ Time Frame: 4-5 years ]
  3. 1-, 3-, 5-year disease free survival [ Time Frame: 7-8 years ]
  4. Number of lymph nodes removed [ Time Frame: 2-3 years ]
  5. 30- day morbidity [ Time Frame: 2-3 years ]
  6. 30-day mortality [ Time Frame: 2-3 years ]

Eligibility Criteria
Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years
  • Able to give informed consent
  • Willing to be randomized

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous mediastinal lymphadenectomy
  • Previous pulmonary metastasectomy
  • Evidence of other metastasetic disease
  • Primary tumor is not under control
  • Five metastases or more
  • If final histologic examination of the resected lung lesion(s) reveals other histology than colorectal metastasis
Contacts and Locations

Locations
Layout table for location information
Denmark
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Rigshospitalet Recruiting
Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100
Contact: Kåre Hornbech, MD    +4535451212    kaare.hornbech.01@regionh.dk   
Contact: Rene H Petersen, MD    +4535450525    Rene.horsleben.petersen@regionh.dk   
Sponsors and Collaborators
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Tracking Information
First Submitted Date  ICMJE April 10, 2017
First Posted Date  ICMJE April 13, 2017
Last Update Posted Date April 13, 2017
Study Start Date  ICMJE October 2015
Estimated Primary Completion Date October 2018   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Current Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: April 10, 2017)
5-year overall survival [ Time Frame: 7-8 years ]
Original Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE Same as current
Change History No Changes Posted
Current Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: April 10, 2017)
  • 1-year overall survival [ Time Frame: 3-4 years ]
  • 3-year overall survival [ Time Frame: 4-5 years ]
  • 1-, 3-, 5-year disease free survival [ Time Frame: 7-8 years ]
  • Number of lymph nodes removed [ Time Frame: 2-3 years ]
  • 30- day morbidity [ Time Frame: 2-3 years ]
  • 30-day mortality [ Time Frame: 2-3 years ]
Original Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE Same as current
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
 
Descriptive Information
Brief Title  ICMJE Mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection in Conjunction With Pulmonary Metastasectomy From Colorectal Cancer
Official Title  ICMJE Total Mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection in Pulmonary Metastasectomy From Colorectal Cancer - a Randomized, Controlled Trial
Brief Summary To study whether or not total mediastinal lymph node dissection in conjunction with pulmonary metastasectomy from colorectal cancer is associated with improved survival compared to pulmonary metastasectomy only.
Detailed Description

The question of lymph node sampling and/or involvement in pulmonary metastasectomy remains controversial. The performance of lymph node dissection during pulmonary metastasectomy is infrequent and varies between institutions. Of all the patients in The International Registry of Lung Metastases only 4,6% of patients underwent lymph node dissection. In a recent survey by Internullo and colleagues amongst the members of European Society of Thoracic Surgeons 55% perform mediastinal lymph node sampling whereas 33% perform no nodal sampling at all. The rate of lymph node involvement varies between primary tumours.

Several studies from groups that systematically perform mediastinal lymph node dissection in conjunction with pulmonary metastasectomy have been published and in all studies the presence of lymph node metastasis emerges as an ominous prognostic factor. Ercan and colleagues found a 3-year survival of 69% for patients without lymph node involvement versus 38% in patients with positive lymph nodes. Saito and colleagues reported a 5-year survival of 53,6 for patients without hilar or mediastinal node involvement versus 6,2% at 4 years for patients with positive nodes. Bölükbas and colleagues reported a 5-year survival of 59% for patients without lymph node involvement in contrast to 23% for patients with lymph node involvement.

The rate of lymph node involvement is reported between 20-43% and risk factors for lymph node involvement include 2 or more metastases, prior liver metastases, rectum cancer and size of metastases .

Most of the above mentioned authors are in favor of mediastinal lymphadenectomy but also stress that the evidence available is not solid enough to make firm recommendations. In conclusion the literature is quite limited and of low-level evidence.

In remains unclear whether the complete removal of mediastinal lymph nodes is associated with a survival benefit or merely allows for a more accurate postoperative staging and guidance for additional oncological treatment. Thus, the aim of the following proposed study is to examine whether or not systemic lymph node dissection during pulmonary metastasectomy is associated with a survival benefit.

Hypothesis:

  1. Systemic mediastinal lymphadenectomy during pulmonary metastasectomy with curative intent for colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is feasible and safe.
  2. Systemic mediastinal lymphadenectomy during pulmonary metastasectomy with curative intent for CRC is associated with improved survival compared to only pulmonary metastasectomy.

Design:

Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. No lymph node dissection versus systemic mediastinal lymph node dissection with en-bloc resection of lymph nodes and fatty tissue in station 2,4,7,8, 9 and 10 on the right side and 5,6,7,8, 9 and 10 on the left side during pulmonary metastasectomy for CRC.

Study Type  ICMJE Interventional
Study Phase  ICMJE Not Applicable
Study Design  ICMJE Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Condition  ICMJE
  • Lung Neoplasms
  • Neoplasm Metastasis
  • Colorectal Cancer
Intervention  ICMJE
  • Procedure: Total mediastinal lymph node dissection and pulmonary metastasectomy
    Total mediastinal lymph node dissection where all lymph nodes and fatty tissues is removed conjunction with pulmonary metastasectomy
  • Procedure: Only pulmonary metastasectomy
Study Arms  ICMJE
  • Experimental: Lymph node dissection and pulmonary metastasectomy
    Total mediastinal lymph node dissection and pulmonary metastasectomy from colorectal cancer
    Intervention: Procedure: Total mediastinal lymph node dissection and pulmonary metastasectomy
  • Active Comparator: Pulmonary metastasectomy only
    Only pulmonary metastasectomy from colorectal cancer
    Intervention: Procedure: Only pulmonary metastasectomy
Publications *
  • Internullo E, Cassivi SD, Van Raemdonck D, Friedel G, Treasure T; ESTS Pulmonary Metastasectomy Working Group. Pulmonary metastasectomy: a survey of current practice amongst members of the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Thorac Oncol. 2008 Nov;3(11):1257-66. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31818bd9da.
  • Ercan S, Nichols FC 3rd, Trastek VF, Deschamps C, Allen MS, Miller DL, Schleck CD, Pairolero PC. Prognostic significance of lymph node metastasis found during pulmonary metastasectomy for extrapulmonary carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 May;77(5):1786-91.
  • Saito Y, Omiya H, Kohno K, Kobayashi T, Itoi K, Teramachi M, Sasaki M, Suzuki H, Takao H, Nakade M. Pulmonary metastasectomy for 165 patients with colorectal carcinoma: A prognostic assessment. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Nov;124(5):1007-13.
  • Bölükbas S, Sponholz S, Kudelin N, Eberlein M, Schirren J. Risk factors for lymph node metastases and prognosticators of survival in patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Jun;97(6):1926-32. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.02.026. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
  • Renaud S, Alifano M, Falcoz PE, Magdeleinat P, Santelmo N, Pagès O, Massard G, Régnard JF. Does nodal status influence survival? Results of a 19-year systematic lymphadenectomy experience during lung metastasectomy of colorectal cancer. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Apr;18(4):482-7. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt554. Epub 2014 Jan 16.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruitment Information
Recruitment Status  ICMJE Recruiting
Estimated Enrollment  ICMJE
 (submitted: April 10, 2017)
200
Original Estimated Enrollment  ICMJE Same as current
Estimated Study Completion Date  ICMJE October 2022
Estimated Primary Completion Date October 2018   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Eligibility Criteria  ICMJE

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years
  • Able to give informed consent
  • Willing to be randomized

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous mediastinal lymphadenectomy
  • Previous pulmonary metastasectomy
  • Evidence of other metastasetic disease
  • Primary tumor is not under control
  • Five metastases or more
  • If final histologic examination of the resected lung lesion(s) reveals other histology than colorectal metastasis
Sex/Gender  ICMJE
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
Ages  ICMJE 18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers  ICMJE Yes
Contacts  ICMJE
Listed Location Countries  ICMJE Denmark
Removed Location Countries  
 
Administrative Information
NCT Number  ICMJE NCT03113318
Other Study ID Numbers  ICMJE Khornbech
Has Data Monitoring Committee No
U.S. FDA-regulated Product Not Provided
IPD Sharing Statement  ICMJE Not Provided
Responsible Party Kåre Hornbech, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Study Sponsor  ICMJE Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Collaborators  ICMJE M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Investigators  ICMJE Not Provided
PRS Account Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Verification Date April 2017

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP

治疗医院