4006-776-356 出国就医服务电话

免费获得国外相关药品,最快 1 个工作日回馈药物信息

出境医 / 临床实验 / Neuromuscular Blockade in the Intentive Care Unit, an Observational Study. (CURATIV)

Neuromuscular Blockade in the Intentive Care Unit, an Observational Study. (CURATIV)

Study Description
Brief Summary:

The study Short description of the protocol intended for the lay public. Include a brief statement of the study hypothesis. (Limit: 5000 characters) Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are drug capable of inducing a complete paralysis of the muscle. Their use is frequent in the intensive care unit (ICU). Most of the time it is used as a single infusion to facilitate endotracheal intubation, but in the ICU the use of continuous infusion is common in several pathologies: acute distress respiratory syndrome, post-cardiac arrest survivor under hypothermia to prevent shivering, abdominal compartment syndrome, severe traumatic brain injury with uncontrolled intra-cranial pressure and severe asthma among others.

A monitoring of the dose of NMBAs is recommended to guide the depth of paralysis and to guide recovery, but in the ICU, the interest of such a monitoring during continuous infusion is unclear and the level of evidence is low.

The investigators propose to conduct a prospective multicentric observational study to describe the current practice in the use of NMBAs in mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU. As a primary objective we will describe the prevalence of NMBAs use in the ICU. As a secondary objective, the investigators will investigate the impact of protocol and/or monitoring devices of NMBAs on the dose administered and clinical outcome endpoints.


Condition or disease Intervention/treatment
Critical Care Mechanical Ventilation Neuromuscular Blockade Drug: Neuromuscular Blocking Agents

Detailed Description:

Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are usually administered during anesthesia for endotracheal tube placement or surgical interventions. But their use is also common in the medical intensive care unit (ICU) (1, 2). Together with sedation and analgesia, they are mainly used in continuous infusion in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrom (ARDS) (3, 4), but also in post-cardiac arrest survivor under hypothermia to prevent shivering (5), in abdominal compartment syndrome (6), in severe traumatic brain injury with uncontrolled intra-cranial pressure (7) and severe asthma among others.

A monitoring of the treatment is recommended (8) and several monitoring techniques exists: qualitative clinical monitoring is known to be inefficient, qualitative clinical monitoring using scores such as the BSAS (9) or monitoring using peripheral nerve stimulation (train-of-four (TOF) (10)) or other devices such as accelerometry or electromyography.

As opposed to their use in the operating room where the interest of the monitoring is proven, there are discrepancy between studies on whether it is useful to monitor NMBAs in the ICU. For instance, Strange et al. did not observe any advantage of the use of a protocol of NMBAs administration (11), and Baumann et al. came to the same conclusions. However, more recently (12), Hraeich et al. found that the monitoring of NMBAs dosage guided by the TOF allowed to significantly reduce the dose administered during ADRS (13).

Thus, in the ICU, although guidelines recommend to monitor NMBAs administration (8), the level of evidence regarding the interest of monitoring and the device to use for such a monitoring is low.

The investigators propose to conduct a prospective multicentric observational study to describe the current practice in the use of NMBAs in mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU. As a primary objective the investigators will describe the prevalence of NMBAs use in the ICU. As a secondary objective, the investigator will investigate the impact of protocol and/or monitoring devices of NMBAs on the dose administered and clinical outcome endpoints, such as in-ICU mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation or acquired neuromyopathy or other complications of NMBAs.

Study Design
Layout table for study information
Study Type : Observational
Estimated Enrollment : 200 participants
Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Prospective
Official Title: Neuromuscular Blockade in the Intentive Care Unit, an Observational Study.
Actual Study Start Date : November 18, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date : June 18, 2020
Estimated Study Completion Date : November 1, 2021
Arms and Interventions
Group/Cohort Intervention/treatment
Neuromuscular blockade
Patients who will receive neuromuscular blockade during their ICU length stay will be follow until day 28 or their hospital discharge.
Drug: Neuromuscular Blocking Agents
Patient who will receive neuromuscular blockade will be follow during their ICU lenght stay.

Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Proportion of patients who receive neuromuscular blockade [ Time Frame: ICU Length stay (usually 7 days) ]
    Proportion between patients who receive neuromuscular blockade and patients hospitalized in ICU and under mechanical ventilation


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Indications of neuromuscular blockade [ Time Frame: ICU Length stay (usually 7 days) ]
    Description of indications for neuromuscular blockade

  2. Monitoring of neuromuscular blockade [ Time Frame: ICU Discharge (usually 7 days) ]
    Proportion of patients in whom neuromuscular blockade was monitored

  3. Neuromuscular blocking agents administered dose [ Time Frame: ICU Discharge (usually 7 days) ]
    Total dose and duration of NMBAs

  4. Tolerance of neuromuscular blocking agents [ Time Frame: ICU Discharge (usually 7 days) ]
    Acquired ICU weakness, pressure ulcer, ventilator associated pneumonia, other potential side effects neuromuscular blocking agents

  5. Number of tracheostomy [ Time Frame: ICU Discharge (usually 7 days) ]
    Proportion of patients who received tracheostomy during their ICU stay

  6. Duration of ICU stay [ Time Frame: ICU Discharge (usually 7 days) ]
    Duration of ICU stay

  7. Duration of mechanical ventilation [ Time Frame: Time from intubation to successfull extubation (usually 5 days) ]
    Duration of mechanical ventilation

  8. ICU Mortality [ Time Frame: Time of ICU discharge (usually 7 days) ]
    Proportion of patients dead during their ICU length stay


Eligibility Criteria
Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Sampling Method:   Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Patients hospitalized in ICU and under mechanical ventilation
Criteria
  • Inclusion criteria

    • Adult Patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit
    • Patient under invasive mechanical ventilation
    • Administration of at least a single dose of neuromuscular blocking agent
  • Exclusion criteria :

    • Administration of a single dose of Succinylcholine or Rocuronium for a rapid-sequence intubation
    • Moribund patient whose life expectancy is less than 24 hours
    • Patient under 18 years old
    • Patient under legal guardianship.
    • Pregnant women
    • Patient already included previously in the study
    • Absence of health insurance in France
    • Neuromuscular blocking agent administered outside the ICU (i.e. in the operating room)
Contacts and Locations

Locations
Layout table for location information
France
CH d'Argenteuil
Argenteuil, France, 95100
CHD Les Oudairies
la Roche sur Yon, France, 85925
CH de Versailles
Le Chesnay, France, 78157
CHU Kremlin-Bicetre
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France, 94270
CH Le Mans
Le Mans, France, 72037
CHU Nantes
Nantes, France, 44000
CHU Nimes
Nîmes, France
CHR Orléans
Orléans, France
CHU La Pitié Salpétrière
Paris, France
CH de Pontoise
Pontoise, France, 95303
CHRU Bretonneau
Tours, France, 37044
Sponsors and Collaborators
French Society for Intensive Care
Tracking Information
First Submitted Date July 18, 2019
First Posted Date July 22, 2019
Last Update Posted Date September 23, 2020
Actual Study Start Date November 18, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date June 18, 2020   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Current Primary Outcome Measures
 (submitted: July 18, 2019)
Proportion of patients who receive neuromuscular blockade [ Time Frame: ICU Length stay (usually 7 days) ]
Proportion between patients who receive neuromuscular blockade and patients hospitalized in ICU and under mechanical ventilation
Original Primary Outcome Measures Same as current
Change History
Current Secondary Outcome Measures
 (submitted: July 18, 2019)
  • Indications of neuromuscular blockade [ Time Frame: ICU Length stay (usually 7 days) ]
    Description of indications for neuromuscular blockade
  • Monitoring of neuromuscular blockade [ Time Frame: ICU Discharge (usually 7 days) ]
    Proportion of patients in whom neuromuscular blockade was monitored
  • Neuromuscular blocking agents administered dose [ Time Frame: ICU Discharge (usually 7 days) ]
    Total dose and duration of NMBAs
  • Tolerance of neuromuscular blocking agents [ Time Frame: ICU Discharge (usually 7 days) ]
    Acquired ICU weakness, pressure ulcer, ventilator associated pneumonia, other potential side effects neuromuscular blocking agents
  • Number of tracheostomy [ Time Frame: ICU Discharge (usually 7 days) ]
    Proportion of patients who received tracheostomy during their ICU stay
  • Duration of ICU stay [ Time Frame: ICU Discharge (usually 7 days) ]
    Duration of ICU stay
  • Duration of mechanical ventilation [ Time Frame: Time from intubation to successfull extubation (usually 5 days) ]
    Duration of mechanical ventilation
  • ICU Mortality [ Time Frame: Time of ICU discharge (usually 7 days) ]
    Proportion of patients dead during their ICU length stay
Original Secondary Outcome Measures Same as current
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
 
Descriptive Information
Brief Title Neuromuscular Blockade in the Intentive Care Unit, an Observational Study.
Official Title Neuromuscular Blockade in the Intentive Care Unit, an Observational Study.
Brief Summary

The study Short description of the protocol intended for the lay public. Include a brief statement of the study hypothesis. (Limit: 5000 characters) Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are drug capable of inducing a complete paralysis of the muscle. Their use is frequent in the intensive care unit (ICU). Most of the time it is used as a single infusion to facilitate endotracheal intubation, but in the ICU the use of continuous infusion is common in several pathologies: acute distress respiratory syndrome, post-cardiac arrest survivor under hypothermia to prevent shivering, abdominal compartment syndrome, severe traumatic brain injury with uncontrolled intra-cranial pressure and severe asthma among others.

A monitoring of the dose of NMBAs is recommended to guide the depth of paralysis and to guide recovery, but in the ICU, the interest of such a monitoring during continuous infusion is unclear and the level of evidence is low.

The investigators propose to conduct a prospective multicentric observational study to describe the current practice in the use of NMBAs in mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU. As a primary objective we will describe the prevalence of NMBAs use in the ICU. As a secondary objective, the investigators will investigate the impact of protocol and/or monitoring devices of NMBAs on the dose administered and clinical outcome endpoints.

Detailed Description

Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are usually administered during anesthesia for endotracheal tube placement or surgical interventions. But their use is also common in the medical intensive care unit (ICU) (1, 2). Together with sedation and analgesia, they are mainly used in continuous infusion in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrom (ARDS) (3, 4), but also in post-cardiac arrest survivor under hypothermia to prevent shivering (5), in abdominal compartment syndrome (6), in severe traumatic brain injury with uncontrolled intra-cranial pressure (7) and severe asthma among others.

A monitoring of the treatment is recommended (8) and several monitoring techniques exists: qualitative clinical monitoring is known to be inefficient, qualitative clinical monitoring using scores such as the BSAS (9) or monitoring using peripheral nerve stimulation (train-of-four (TOF) (10)) or other devices such as accelerometry or electromyography.

As opposed to their use in the operating room where the interest of the monitoring is proven, there are discrepancy between studies on whether it is useful to monitor NMBAs in the ICU. For instance, Strange et al. did not observe any advantage of the use of a protocol of NMBAs administration (11), and Baumann et al. came to the same conclusions. However, more recently (12), Hraeich et al. found that the monitoring of NMBAs dosage guided by the TOF allowed to significantly reduce the dose administered during ADRS (13).

Thus, in the ICU, although guidelines recommend to monitor NMBAs administration (8), the level of evidence regarding the interest of monitoring and the device to use for such a monitoring is low.

The investigators propose to conduct a prospective multicentric observational study to describe the current practice in the use of NMBAs in mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU. As a primary objective the investigators will describe the prevalence of NMBAs use in the ICU. As a secondary objective, the investigator will investigate the impact of protocol and/or monitoring devices of NMBAs on the dose administered and clinical outcome endpoints, such as in-ICU mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation or acquired neuromyopathy or other complications of NMBAs.

Study Type Observational
Study Design Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Prospective
Target Follow-Up Duration Not Provided
Biospecimen Not Provided
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Study Population Patients hospitalized in ICU and under mechanical ventilation
Condition
  • Critical Care
  • Mechanical Ventilation
  • Neuromuscular Blockade
Intervention Drug: Neuromuscular Blocking Agents
Patient who will receive neuromuscular blockade will be follow during their ICU lenght stay.
Study Groups/Cohorts Neuromuscular blockade
Patients who will receive neuromuscular blockade during their ICU length stay will be follow until day 28 or their hospital discharge.
Intervention: Drug: Neuromuscular Blocking Agents
Publications *
  • Arroliga A, Frutos-Vivar F, Hall J, Esteban A, Apezteguía C, Soto L, Anzueto A; International Mechanical Ventilation Study Group. Use of sedatives and neuromuscular blockers in a cohort of patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Chest. 2005 Aug;128(2):496-506.
  • Arroliga AC, Thompson BT, Ancukiewicz M, Gonzales JP, Guntupalli KK, Park PK, Wiedemann HP, Anzueto A; Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Use of sedatives, opioids, and neuromuscular blocking agents in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2008 Apr;36(4):1083-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0B013E3181653895.
  • Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, Gattinoni L, van Haren F, Larsson A, McAuley DF, Ranieri M, Rubenfeld G, Thompson BT, Wrigge H, Slutsky AS, Pesenti A; LUNG SAFE Investigators; ESICM Trials Group. Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries. JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):788-800. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0291. Erratum in: JAMA. 2016 Jul 19;316(3):350. JAMA. 2016 Jul 19;316(3):350.
  • Papazian L, Forel JM, Gacouin A, Penot-Ragon C, Perrin G, Loundou A, Jaber S, Arnal JM, Perez D, Seghboyan JM, Constantin JM, Courant P, Lefrant JY, Guérin C, Prat G, Morange S, Roch A; ACURASYS Study Investigators. Neuromuscular blockers in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 16;363(12):1107-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1005372.
  • Lascarrou JB, Le Gouge A, Dimet J, Lacherade JC, Martin-Lefèvre L, Fiancette M, Vinatier I, Lebert C, Bachoumas K, Yehia A, Lagarrigue MH, Colin G, Reignier J. Neuromuscular blockade during therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest: observational study of neurological and infectious outcomes. Resuscitation. 2014 Sep;85(9):1257-62. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.05.017. Epub 2014 Jun 2.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruitment Information
Recruitment Status Active, not recruiting
Estimated Enrollment
 (submitted: July 18, 2019)
200
Original Estimated Enrollment Same as current
Estimated Study Completion Date November 1, 2021
Actual Primary Completion Date June 18, 2020   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Eligibility Criteria
  • Inclusion criteria

    • Adult Patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit
    • Patient under invasive mechanical ventilation
    • Administration of at least a single dose of neuromuscular blocking agent
  • Exclusion criteria :

    • Administration of a single dose of Succinylcholine or Rocuronium for a rapid-sequence intubation
    • Moribund patient whose life expectancy is less than 24 hours
    • Patient under 18 years old
    • Patient under legal guardianship.
    • Pregnant women
    • Patient already included previously in the study
    • Absence of health insurance in France
    • Neuromuscular blocking agent administered outside the ICU (i.e. in the operating room)
Sex/Gender
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
Ages 18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers No
Contacts Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Listed Location Countries France
Removed Location Countries  
 
Administrative Information
NCT Number NCT04028362
Other Study ID Numbers 2019-A01378-49
Has Data Monitoring Committee No
U.S. FDA-regulated Product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD: Undecided
Plan Description: IPD can be obtained from PI after careful evaluation of request by clinical research committee of the French Intensive Care Society
Responsible Party French Society for Intensive Care
Study Sponsor French Society for Intensive Care
Collaborators Not Provided
Investigators Not Provided
PRS Account French Society for Intensive Care
Verification Date September 2020