Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Prostate Adenocarcinoma | Combination Product: MVA-BN-Brachyury | Phase 2 |
Here we propose to use a combination of both checkpoint therapy with dual vaccine therapy. Patients will be treated with an intraprostatic injection of MVA-BN-Brachyury and subcutaneous PROSTVAC therapy. MVA-BN-Brachyury is a replication-deficient, attenuated vaccinia virus (Ankara strain) expressing both a CD8+ T-cell epitope from the brachyury protein and a triad of T-cell co-stimulatory molecules (B7.1, ICAM-1 and LFA-3). MVA-brachury-TRICOM, upon infection of cells, causes innate and then adaptive immune responses, antigen cascade, and improved T cell trafficking to the tumor. Vaccine therapy is one strategy that might increase immune infiltration into the tumor microenvironment. Prostate cancer is known to have minimal lymphocyte infiltration within the microenvironment.
This vaccine strategy of direct injection into the tumor in combination with checkpoint inhibitors has previously been performed in early phase clinical trials.6 Furthermore, this approach of potent vaccine vector use can induce systemic effects as seen in a recent clinical trial of 12 patients with metastatic melanoma.12 In that study, responses were also observed in non-target lesions. In this case, MVA-BN-Brachyury is preferred as in intralesional injection agent over other vaccines due to the increased immunogenicity of MVA compared with fowlpox and improved safety profile for direct injection when compared with vaccinia, due to replication incompetence. In the prior study with MVA-BN-Brachyury no patients were observed to have replication of the virus.
T cell mediated tumor cell killing is dependent on specific T cell recognition of a tumor target antigen, localization of those specific T cells to the tumor, and those T cells properly functioning within the tumor microenvironment. We hypothesize that these three primary issues comprise the major causes of most patients receiving no benefit from checkpoint inhibitor therapy or with vaccine monotherapy. We hypothesize that these issues can be addressed with an active intratumoral virus administration approach combined with the use of a subcutaneously administered vaccine (PROSTVAC) to induce PSA-specific T cell activation in combination with a checkpoint inhibitor. Combination viral based vaccine plus immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy will result in exposure of cancer specific antigens and induce inflammation at the site of the cancer ultimately resulting in significant clinical antitumor effect. Additionally, we hypothesize that the concurrent administration of anti-PD-1 moncolonal antibody therapy is necessary to allow those active T cells to achieve tumor cell killing, and significant overall clinical efficacy.
The addition of atezolizumab is likely to provide additional efficacy over vaccine therapy alone. This is suggested by the induction of PD-1+ T-cells with vaccines.17 Additionally, PD-1 inhibition with nivolumab18 and pembrolizumab19 have shown clinical activity in metastatic prostate cancer. We suggest that the combination will provide even greater efficacy.
Multiple studies have demonstrated a strong correlation between density of lymphocytes and prognosis, including overall survival.13-16 Given the very low density of infiltrating lymphocytes historically in prostate cancer, (Kaur HB, Hum Path 2019) we suggest that the primary endpoint of the change in CD8+ density is a reasonable pharmacodynamic endpoint for this exploratory, hypothesis generating study. However, as this study will be the first to date of the treatment combination, safety will also serve as a co-primary endpoint. The secondary objectives of PSA responses will help confirm the clinical utility of this approach in this target population.
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Estimated Enrollment : | 22 participants |
Allocation: | N/A |
Intervention Model: | Single Group Assignment |
Intervention Model Description: | This study is a prospective, open label, single arm phase II trial. |
Masking: | None (Open Label) |
Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
Official Title: | Perioperative Atezolizumab With MVA-BN-Brachyury and PROSTVAC For Intermediate-Risk And High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer |
Actual Study Start Date : | November 20, 2019 |
Estimated Primary Completion Date : | March 2023 |
Estimated Study Completion Date : | March 2024 |
Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Treatment: all patients |
Combination Product: MVA-BN-Brachyury
Cycle= 21 days. Neoadjuvant Therapy: Treatment will be given for 2 neoadjuvant cycles. MVA-BN-Brachyury will be administered as intratumoral injection on Day 1 of each of 2 neoadjuvant cycles. PROSTVAC-V will be administered as a subq injection on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (the first neoadjuvant cycle) and PROSTVAC-F will be administered as a subq injection on Day 1 of Cycle 2 (the second neoadjuvant cycle). Atezolizumab will be given as an infusion on Day 1 of each 2 neoadjuvant cycles. MVA-BN-Brachyury will be injected intratumorally into the prostate. Injections will target PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions. Surgery: Patients will undergo SOC radical prostatectomy Adjuvant Therapy: Systemic treatment with atezolizumab and PROSTVAC-F will be reinitiated between 3 to 8 weeks after surgery and will continue for an additional 6 cycles. PROSTVAC-F will be given as a subq injection on Day 1 of each cycle. Atezolizumab will be given as an infusion on Day 1 of each cycle. Other Names:
|
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | Male |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Adequate organ function as defined as:
White blood cell count (WBC) ≥ 2.5 × 109/L.
AST and ALT levels ≤ 2.5 × ULN. Patient with a history of unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia with otherwise acceptable liver enzyme levels (as per above criteria) may have higher bilirubin levels.
Exclusion Criteria:
Use of immunosuppressive medication within 28 days of study treatment initiation, EXCEPT for the following:
The subject has uncontrolled, significant intercurrent or recent illness including, but not limited to, the following conditions:
o Cardiovascular disorders:
Stroke (including transient ischemic attack [TIA]), myocardial infarction (MI), or other ischemic event, or thromboembolic event (eg, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism) within 3 months before first dose.
Contact: Sally Fairbairn | 801-587-4765 | sally.fairbairn@hci.utah.edu |
United States, Utah | |
Huntsman Cancer Institute | Recruiting |
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84112 | |
Contact: Sally Fairbairn 801-587-4765 sally.fairbairn@hci.utah.edu | |
Principal Investigator: Benjamin Maughan, MD, PharmD |
Tracking Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date ICMJE | July 8, 2019 | ||||
First Posted Date ICMJE | July 15, 2019 | ||||
Last Update Posted Date | September 4, 2020 | ||||
Actual Study Start Date ICMJE | November 20, 2019 | ||||
Estimated Primary Completion Date | March 2023 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||
Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
Change History | |||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||
Descriptive Information | |||||
Brief Title ICMJE | Perioperative Atezolizumab With MVA-BN-Brachyury and PROSTVAC For Intermediate-Risk And High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer | ||||
Official Title ICMJE | Perioperative Atezolizumab With MVA-BN-Brachyury and PROSTVAC For Intermediate-Risk And High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer | ||||
Brief Summary | This study is a prospective, open label, single arm phase II trial. A total of 22 patients will be treated with atezolizumab, PROSTVAC, and pre-operative MVA-BN-Brachyury to confirm the efficacy of prostatic combination immunotherapy and to measure the relative change in the number of tumor infiltrating CD8+ lymphocytes within the prostate tissue between the paired biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens. | ||||
Detailed Description |
Here we propose to use a combination of both checkpoint therapy with dual vaccine therapy. Patients will be treated with an intraprostatic injection of MVA-BN-Brachyury and subcutaneous PROSTVAC therapy. MVA-BN-Brachyury is a replication-deficient, attenuated vaccinia virus (Ankara strain) expressing both a CD8+ T-cell epitope from the brachyury protein and a triad of T-cell co-stimulatory molecules (B7.1, ICAM-1 and LFA-3). MVA-brachury-TRICOM, upon infection of cells, causes innate and then adaptive immune responses, antigen cascade, and improved T cell trafficking to the tumor. Vaccine therapy is one strategy that might increase immune infiltration into the tumor microenvironment. Prostate cancer is known to have minimal lymphocyte infiltration within the microenvironment. This vaccine strategy of direct injection into the tumor in combination with checkpoint inhibitors has previously been performed in early phase clinical trials.6 Furthermore, this approach of potent vaccine vector use can induce systemic effects as seen in a recent clinical trial of 12 patients with metastatic melanoma.12 In that study, responses were also observed in non-target lesions. In this case, MVA-BN-Brachyury is preferred as in intralesional injection agent over other vaccines due to the increased immunogenicity of MVA compared with fowlpox and improved safety profile for direct injection when compared with vaccinia, due to replication incompetence. In the prior study with MVA-BN-Brachyury no patients were observed to have replication of the virus. T cell mediated tumor cell killing is dependent on specific T cell recognition of a tumor target antigen, localization of those specific T cells to the tumor, and those T cells properly functioning within the tumor microenvironment. We hypothesize that these three primary issues comprise the major causes of most patients receiving no benefit from checkpoint inhibitor therapy or with vaccine monotherapy. We hypothesize that these issues can be addressed with an active intratumoral virus administration approach combined with the use of a subcutaneously administered vaccine (PROSTVAC) to induce PSA-specific T cell activation in combination with a checkpoint inhibitor. Combination viral based vaccine plus immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy will result in exposure of cancer specific antigens and induce inflammation at the site of the cancer ultimately resulting in significant clinical antitumor effect. Additionally, we hypothesize that the concurrent administration of anti-PD-1 moncolonal antibody therapy is necessary to allow those active T cells to achieve tumor cell killing, and significant overall clinical efficacy. The addition of atezolizumab is likely to provide additional efficacy over vaccine therapy alone. This is suggested by the induction of PD-1+ T-cells with vaccines.17 Additionally, PD-1 inhibition with nivolumab18 and pembrolizumab19 have shown clinical activity in metastatic prostate cancer. We suggest that the combination will provide even greater efficacy. Multiple studies have demonstrated a strong correlation between density of lymphocytes and prognosis, including overall survival.13-16 Given the very low density of infiltrating lymphocytes historically in prostate cancer, (Kaur HB, Hum Path 2019) we suggest that the primary endpoint of the change in CD8+ density is a reasonable pharmacodynamic endpoint for this exploratory, hypothesis generating study. However, as this study will be the first to date of the treatment combination, safety will also serve as a co-primary endpoint. The secondary objectives of PSA responses will help confirm the clinical utility of this approach in this target population. |
||||
Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
Study Phase ICMJE | Phase 2 | ||||
Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: N/A Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Intervention Model Description: This study is a prospective, open label, single arm phase II trial. Masking: None (Open Label)Primary Purpose: Treatment |
||||
Condition ICMJE | Prostate Adenocarcinoma | ||||
Intervention ICMJE | Combination Product: MVA-BN-Brachyury
Cycle= 21 days. Neoadjuvant Therapy: Treatment will be given for 2 neoadjuvant cycles. MVA-BN-Brachyury will be administered as intratumoral injection on Day 1 of each of 2 neoadjuvant cycles. PROSTVAC-V will be administered as a subq injection on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (the first neoadjuvant cycle) and PROSTVAC-F will be administered as a subq injection on Day 1 of Cycle 2 (the second neoadjuvant cycle). Atezolizumab will be given as an infusion on Day 1 of each 2 neoadjuvant cycles. MVA-BN-Brachyury will be injected intratumorally into the prostate. Injections will target PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions. Surgery: Patients will undergo SOC radical prostatectomy Adjuvant Therapy: Systemic treatment with atezolizumab and PROSTVAC-F will be reinitiated between 3 to 8 weeks after surgery and will continue for an additional 6 cycles. PROSTVAC-F will be given as a subq injection on Day 1 of each cycle. Atezolizumab will be given as an infusion on Day 1 of each cycle. Other Names:
|
||||
Study Arms ICMJE | Experimental: Treatment: all patients
Intervention: Combination Product: MVA-BN-Brachyury
|
||||
Publications * | Not Provided | ||||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
Recruitment Information | |||||
Recruitment Status ICMJE | Recruiting | ||||
Estimated Enrollment ICMJE |
22 | ||||
Original Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
Estimated Study Completion Date ICMJE | March 2024 | ||||
Estimated Primary Completion Date | March 2023 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Eligibility Criteria ICMJE |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
Sex/Gender ICMJE |
|
||||
Ages ICMJE | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) | ||||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE | No | ||||
Contacts ICMJE |
|
||||
Listed Location Countries ICMJE | United States | ||||
Removed Location Countries | |||||
Administrative Information | |||||
NCT Number ICMJE | NCT04020094 | ||||
Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | HCI121075 | ||||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes | ||||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product |
|
||||
IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE |
|
||||
Responsible Party | University of Utah | ||||
Study Sponsor ICMJE | University of Utah | ||||
Collaborators ICMJE |
|
||||
Investigators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
PRS Account | University of Utah | ||||
Verification Date | September 2020 | ||||
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |