Design: PARCADIA is a prospective non-randomized non-interventional multi-center clinical investigation in Europe. Patients with depressed LV (left ventricular) function assessed on local standards, of ischemic origin and on chronic optimal medical therapy will be selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, implanted with an ICD after executing baseline investigations and prospectively followed up for minimal 24 months and until the termination of the clinical investigation.
General objective: analysis of baseline risk factors to identify predictors for appropriate ICD intervention in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy receiving an ICD for primary prevention (MADIT II population).
Hypothesis: The primary alternative hypothesis states that the mean relative infarct transmurality (RIT) is different in patients with (RITshock or ATP (Anti Tachy Pacing)) and without (RITno shock or ATP )appropriate ICD intervention, i.e. shock or ATP.
Sample size: 200 patients.
Follow-up: Enrolment visit, pre implant screening, ICD implantation, pre-hospital discharge visit, and follow-up (FUP) visits at 2, 6, 12, 18, 24 months including home monitoring. Additional routine FUP every 6 months until study termination after last enrolled patient has completed 2 years FUP.
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
ICD Cardiomyopathy Ischemic Primary Prevention | Device: ICD implantation | Not Applicable |
Rationale: Implantation of an ICD as primary prevention therapy is indicated according to the current guidelines based on the low LVEF (Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction) as it was shown to significantly reduce mortality. Although of proven efficacy, ICD therapy is associated with survival benefit in only a small fraction of patients. It is estimated that 18 patients would have to receive an ICD to save one life, resulting in a huge burden on national health systems. Moreover, only about one quarter of all guideline eligible primary prevention ICD patients receive appropriate shocks. The above considerations support the need for an effective risk-stratification method to identify patients that benefit most (or least) from this therapy. Evaluation of ventricular anatomy and function by imaging techniques has become more important since this provides information on the substrate (myocardial scar) and trigger of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Besides accurate estimation of left and right ventricular volumes and functions, Late Gadolinium Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (LGE-CMR) imaging has a very high sensitivity to detect myocardial scar. Quantification of scar characteristics by cardiac MRI might be useful for the prediction of future arrhythmic events in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. However evidence is conflicting and published papers are hampered by limited patient numbers and can only be regarded in the light of generating hypothesis. The PARCADIA clinical investigation will explore the potential of cardiac MRI as a predictor for appropriate ICD intervention in a multicenter setting.
PARCADIA is a prospective non-randomized non-interventional multi-center clinical investigation in Europe. Patients with depressed LV (Left Ventricular) function assessed on local standards, of ischemic (at least 40 days post-MI (myocardial infarction) or 3 months post revascularization) origin and on chronic optimal medical therapy will be selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, implanted with an ICD after executing baseline investigations and prospectively followed up for minimal 24 months and until the termination of the clinical investigation
General objective: analysis of baseline risk factors to identify predictors for appropriate ICD intervention in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy receiving an ICD for primary prevention (MADIT II population).
The primary objective of the clinical investigation is to determine whether there is a relationship between appropriate ICD intervention (shock or ATP) and the Relative Infarct Transmurality (RIT) obtained from Late Gadolinium Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (LGE-CMR) imaging in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, receiving an ICD for primary prevention.
Methodology: Screening: (within 6 months before enrolment) patients with LV depressed function due to Ischemic Cardiomyopathy with an indication for primary prevention ICD implantation according to ESC (European Society of Cardiology) guidelines or local standards will be screened within 6 months before enrolment.
pre implant diagnostics: within 3 months after enrolment LGE-CMR imaging, 24h holter, 12-lead ECG, will be performed and biochemical markers will be obtained.
ICD implantation: Implantation of a Lumax 540 single/dual chamber ICD or successor withiin 3 months after enrolment. The ICD will be programmed according to protocol.
Pre-hospital discharge an ICD interrogation wil be performed. Follow-up (FUP) visits at: 2, 6, 12, 18, 24 months with inclusion of standard 12-lead ECG, ICD check-up and cardiologist visit in the outpatient clinic. Additional routine FUP every 6 months until study termination after last enrolled patient has completed 2 years FUP.
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Actual Enrollment : | 200 participants |
Allocation: | N/A |
Intervention Model: | Single Group Assignment |
Intervention Model Description: | The study model is single group. At the analysis the patients will be divided in two groups bij outcome of ICD therapy/no ICD therapy. The endpoints related to the primary hypothesis are appropriate ICD intervention (shock or ATP) and Relative Infarct Transmurality (RIT = transmural infarct mass / total infarct mass) obtained from LGE-CMR. ICD interventions will be labeled appropriate or non-appropriate by an independent endpoint committee.
|
Masking: | None (Open Label) |
Primary Purpose: | Prevention |
Official Title: | Prospective Assessment of Risk Factors for Appropriate ICD Intervention in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy |
Actual Study Start Date : | July 24, 2012 |
Actual Primary Completion Date : | May 28, 2020 |
Actual Study Completion Date : | July 22, 2020 |
Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
ICD implantation
Implantation of a Lumax 540 single/dual chamber ICD or successor according to local practice within 3 months after enrolment. The patient will be implanted with a single or dual chamber device according to ESC guidelines.
|
Device: ICD implantation
implantation of the Lumax 540 single/dual chamber ICD or successor
Other Name: Lumax 540 single/dual chamber ICD or successor
|
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
No Contacts or Locations Provided
Tracking Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date ICMJE | May 10, 2019 | ||||
First Posted Date ICMJE | July 10, 2019 | ||||
Last Update Posted Date | September 29, 2020 | ||||
Actual Study Start Date ICMJE | July 24, 2012 | ||||
Actual Primary Completion Date | May 28, 2020 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||
Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
Change History | |||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||
Descriptive Information | |||||
Brief Title ICMJE | Assessment of Risk Factors for Appropriate ICD (Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator) Intervention in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy | ||||
Official Title ICMJE | Prospective Assessment of Risk Factors for Appropriate ICD Intervention in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy | ||||
Brief Summary |
Design: PARCADIA is a prospective non-randomized non-interventional multi-center clinical investigation in Europe. Patients with depressed LV (left ventricular) function assessed on local standards, of ischemic origin and on chronic optimal medical therapy will be selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, implanted with an ICD after executing baseline investigations and prospectively followed up for minimal 24 months and until the termination of the clinical investigation. General objective: analysis of baseline risk factors to identify predictors for appropriate ICD intervention in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy receiving an ICD for primary prevention (MADIT II population). Hypothesis: The primary alternative hypothesis states that the mean relative infarct transmurality (RIT) is different in patients with (RITshock or ATP (Anti Tachy Pacing)) and without (RITno shock or ATP )appropriate ICD intervention, i.e. shock or ATP.
Sample size: 200 patients. Follow-up: Enrolment visit, pre implant screening, ICD implantation, pre-hospital discharge visit, and follow-up (FUP) visits at 2, 6, 12, 18, 24 months including home monitoring. Additional routine FUP every 6 months until study termination after last enrolled patient has completed 2 years FUP. |
||||
Detailed Description |
Rationale: Implantation of an ICD as primary prevention therapy is indicated according to the current guidelines based on the low LVEF (Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction) as it was shown to significantly reduce mortality. Although of proven efficacy, ICD therapy is associated with survival benefit in only a small fraction of patients. It is estimated that 18 patients would have to receive an ICD to save one life, resulting in a huge burden on national health systems. Moreover, only about one quarter of all guideline eligible primary prevention ICD patients receive appropriate shocks. The above considerations support the need for an effective risk-stratification method to identify patients that benefit most (or least) from this therapy. Evaluation of ventricular anatomy and function by imaging techniques has become more important since this provides information on the substrate (myocardial scar) and trigger of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Besides accurate estimation of left and right ventricular volumes and functions, Late Gadolinium Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (LGE-CMR) imaging has a very high sensitivity to detect myocardial scar. Quantification of scar characteristics by cardiac MRI might be useful for the prediction of future arrhythmic events in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. However evidence is conflicting and published papers are hampered by limited patient numbers and can only be regarded in the light of generating hypothesis. The PARCADIA clinical investigation will explore the potential of cardiac MRI as a predictor for appropriate ICD intervention in a multicenter setting. PARCADIA is a prospective non-randomized non-interventional multi-center clinical investigation in Europe. Patients with depressed LV (Left Ventricular) function assessed on local standards, of ischemic (at least 40 days post-MI (myocardial infarction) or 3 months post revascularization) origin and on chronic optimal medical therapy will be selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, implanted with an ICD after executing baseline investigations and prospectively followed up for minimal 24 months and until the termination of the clinical investigation General objective: analysis of baseline risk factors to identify predictors for appropriate ICD intervention in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy receiving an ICD for primary prevention (MADIT II population). The primary objective of the clinical investigation is to determine whether there is a relationship between appropriate ICD intervention (shock or ATP) and the Relative Infarct Transmurality (RIT) obtained from Late Gadolinium Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (LGE-CMR) imaging in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, receiving an ICD for primary prevention. Methodology: Screening: (within 6 months before enrolment) patients with LV depressed function due to Ischemic Cardiomyopathy with an indication for primary prevention ICD implantation according to ESC (European Society of Cardiology) guidelines or local standards will be screened within 6 months before enrolment. pre implant diagnostics: within 3 months after enrolment LGE-CMR imaging, 24h holter, 12-lead ECG, will be performed and biochemical markers will be obtained. ICD implantation: Implantation of a Lumax 540 single/dual chamber ICD or successor withiin 3 months after enrolment. The ICD will be programmed according to protocol. Pre-hospital discharge an ICD interrogation wil be performed. Follow-up (FUP) visits at: 2, 6, 12, 18, 24 months with inclusion of standard 12-lead ECG, ICD check-up and cardiologist visit in the outpatient clinic. Additional routine FUP every 6 months until study termination after last enrolled patient has completed 2 years FUP. |
||||
Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
Study Phase ICMJE | Not Applicable | ||||
Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: N/A Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Intervention Model Description: The study model is single group. At the analysis the patients will be divided in two groups bij outcome of ICD therapy/no ICD therapy. The endpoints related to the primary hypothesis are appropriate ICD intervention (shock or ATP) and Relative Infarct Transmurality (RIT = transmural infarct mass / total infarct mass) obtained from LGE-CMR. ICD interventions will be labeled appropriate or non-appropriate by an independent endpoint committee.
Primary Purpose: Prevention |
||||
Condition ICMJE |
|
||||
Intervention ICMJE | Device: ICD implantation
implantation of the Lumax 540 single/dual chamber ICD or successor
Other Name: Lumax 540 single/dual chamber ICD or successor
|
||||
Study Arms ICMJE | ICD implantation
Implantation of a Lumax 540 single/dual chamber ICD or successor according to local practice within 3 months after enrolment. The patient will be implanted with a single or dual chamber device according to ESC guidelines.
Intervention: Device: ICD implantation
|
||||
Publications * | Not Provided | ||||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
Recruitment Information | |||||
Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed | ||||
Actual Enrollment ICMJE |
200 | ||||
Original Actual Enrollment ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
Actual Study Completion Date ICMJE | July 22, 2020 | ||||
Actual Primary Completion Date | May 28, 2020 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Eligibility Criteria ICMJE |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
Sex/Gender ICMJE |
|
||||
Ages ICMJE | 18 Years to 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult) | ||||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE | No | ||||
Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||
Listed Location Countries ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
Removed Location Countries | |||||
Administrative Information | |||||
NCT Number ICMJE | NCT04014946 | ||||
Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | TA97 | ||||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product |
|
||||
IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE |
|
||||
Responsible Party | Biotronik SE & Co. KG | ||||
Study Sponsor ICMJE | Biotronik SE & Co. KG | ||||
Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
Investigators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
PRS Account | Biotronik SE & Co. KG | ||||
Verification Date | September 2020 | ||||
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |