4006-776-356 出国就医服务电话

免费获得国外相关药品,最快 1 个工作日回馈药物信息

出境医 / 临床实验 / No Reflow Phenomenon Incidence and Predictors (NORM-PPCI)

No Reflow Phenomenon Incidence and Predictors (NORM-PPCI)

Study Description
Brief Summary:

Background No reflow phenomenon is described in up to 65% of patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). It is known to be associated with worse outcomes but predictors of no reflow are not clearly described.

Objectives A single centre case-control observational study of patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction appropriate for PPCI comparing baseline clinical, biochemical and angiographic characteristics between patients with no reflow phenomenon and those without. Aiming to establish incidence for the UK population.

Secondary outcomes will be to gain further insight into those presenting with STEMI for PPCI and develop a risk model to guide management and clinical outcomes of patients to 30days.

Methods This study will prospectively recruit all consecutive patients attending a single centre for primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI. Angiographic assessment of the recanalised epicardial vessel will be used to diagnose no reflow (reduced TIMI flow or blush grade). Baseline demographic, angiographic and biochemical characteristics and outcomes at 30days for reflow and no reflow cohorts will be statistically assessed and compared with logistic regression.


Condition or disease Intervention/treatment
No Reflow Phenomenon STEMI Other: No intervention as observational study

Study Design
Layout table for study information
Study Type : Observational
Actual Enrollment : 176 participants
Observational Model: Case-Control
Time Perspective: Prospective
Official Title: NO Reflow Phenomenon and Comparison to the Normal Flow Population Post Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Actual Study Start Date : October 29, 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date : May 31, 2016
Actual Study Completion Date : September 1, 2017
Arms and Interventions
Group/Cohort Intervention/treatment
No reflow phenomenon

Those that during procedure experience no reflow phenomenon

To define no reflow requires:

• Angiographic evidence of reopening of occluded coronary artery and successful stent placement with no evidence of flow-limiting residual stenosis (<50%), dissection, vessel spasm, or thrombus burden

and

  • Angiographic documentation of a TIMI flow grade ≤II, or
  • A TIMI flow grade III with a myocardial perfusion grade 0 or I, at least 10 min after the end of PCI procedure.
Other: No intervention as observational study
No NRP
Normal angiographic coronary flow/blush post patent culprit vessel.
Other: No intervention as observational study
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Incidence of no reflow phenomenon [ Time Frame: 0-2 days ]

Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Predictors of no reflow phenomenon [ Time Frame: 0-3 days ]
    Statistical analysis of multiple variables to find independent predictors

  2. MACE outcomes [ Time Frame: 30 days ]
    • Cardiovascular death
    • Death
    • Hearth Failure (Killip class III/IV)
    • MI
    • CVA
    • Repeat unplanned angiography
    • Repeat unplanned revascularisation


Eligibility Criteria
Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Sampling Method:   Probability Sample
Study Population
The cohort is defined as all patients attending with ST elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Cases are those subjects who suffered no reflow phenomenon, with control comparators those that had TIMI III flow and grade III myocardial blush post procedure.
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Presenting with ST elevation myocardial infarction
  • Appropriate for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention not performed eg due to non- flow- limiting coronary artery disease
  • Unsuccessful PCI
  • Thrombolysis
  • Patients who do not survive the procedure to leave the catheterisation laboratory
Contacts and Locations

Locations
Layout table for location information
United Kingdom
Castle Hill Hospital (Hull and east Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust)
Cottingham, East Yorkshire, United Kingdom, HU16 5JQ
Sponsors and Collaborators
Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Jennifer A Rossington, BSc MBChB Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Tracking Information
First Submitted Date June 18, 2019
First Posted Date July 12, 2019
Last Update Posted Date July 29, 2019
Actual Study Start Date October 29, 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date May 31, 2016   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Current Primary Outcome Measures
 (submitted: July 11, 2019)
Incidence of no reflow phenomenon [ Time Frame: 0-2 days ]
Original Primary Outcome Measures Same as current
Change History
Current Secondary Outcome Measures
 (submitted: July 11, 2019)
  • Predictors of no reflow phenomenon [ Time Frame: 0-3 days ]
    Statistical analysis of multiple variables to find independent predictors
  • MACE outcomes [ Time Frame: 30 days ]
    • Cardiovascular death
    • Death
    • Hearth Failure (Killip class III/IV)
    • MI
    • CVA
    • Repeat unplanned angiography
    • Repeat unplanned revascularisation
Original Secondary Outcome Measures Same as current
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
 
Descriptive Information
Brief Title No Reflow Phenomenon Incidence and Predictors
Official Title NO Reflow Phenomenon and Comparison to the Normal Flow Population Post Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Brief Summary

Background No reflow phenomenon is described in up to 65% of patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). It is known to be associated with worse outcomes but predictors of no reflow are not clearly described.

Objectives A single centre case-control observational study of patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction appropriate for PPCI comparing baseline clinical, biochemical and angiographic characteristics between patients with no reflow phenomenon and those without. Aiming to establish incidence for the UK population.

Secondary outcomes will be to gain further insight into those presenting with STEMI for PPCI and develop a risk model to guide management and clinical outcomes of patients to 30days.

Methods This study will prospectively recruit all consecutive patients attending a single centre for primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI. Angiographic assessment of the recanalised epicardial vessel will be used to diagnose no reflow (reduced TIMI flow or blush grade). Baseline demographic, angiographic and biochemical characteristics and outcomes at 30days for reflow and no reflow cohorts will be statistically assessed and compared with logistic regression.

Detailed Description Not Provided
Study Type Observational
Study Design Observational Model: Case-Control
Time Perspective: Prospective
Target Follow-Up Duration Not Provided
Biospecimen Not Provided
Sampling Method Probability Sample
Study Population The cohort is defined as all patients attending with ST elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Cases are those subjects who suffered no reflow phenomenon, with control comparators those that had TIMI III flow and grade III myocardial blush post procedure.
Condition
  • No Reflow Phenomenon
  • STEMI
Intervention Other: No intervention as observational study
Study Groups/Cohorts
  • No reflow phenomenon

    Those that during procedure experience no reflow phenomenon

    To define no reflow requires:

    • Angiographic evidence of reopening of occluded coronary artery and successful stent placement with no evidence of flow-limiting residual stenosis (<50%), dissection, vessel spasm, or thrombus burden

    and

    • Angiographic documentation of a TIMI flow grade ≤II, or
    • A TIMI flow grade III with a myocardial perfusion grade 0 or I, at least 10 min after the end of PCI procedure.
    Intervention: Other: No intervention as observational study
  • No NRP
    Normal angiographic coronary flow/blush post patent culprit vessel.
    Intervention: Other: No intervention as observational study
Publications * Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruitment Information
Recruitment Status Completed
Actual Enrollment
 (submitted: July 11, 2019)
176
Original Actual Enrollment Same as current
Actual Study Completion Date September 1, 2017
Actual Primary Completion Date May 31, 2016   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Presenting with ST elevation myocardial infarction
  • Appropriate for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention not performed eg due to non- flow- limiting coronary artery disease
  • Unsuccessful PCI
  • Thrombolysis
  • Patients who do not survive the procedure to leave the catheterisation laboratory
Sex/Gender
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
Ages 18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers No
Contacts Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Listed Location Countries United Kingdom
Removed Location Countries  
 
Administrative Information
NCT Number NCT04017169
Other Study ID Numbers NORM PPCI
Has Data Monitoring Committee No
U.S. FDA-regulated Product Not Provided
IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD: No
Responsible Party Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Study Sponsor Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Collaborators Not Provided
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Jennifer A Rossington, BSc MBChB Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
PRS Account Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Verification Date July 2019