免费获得国外相关药品,最快 1 个工作日回馈药物信息

出境医 / 临床实验 / Validation of Bladder Health Instrument for Evaluation in Women (VIEW)

Validation of Bladder Health Instrument for Evaluation in Women (VIEW)

Study Description
Brief Summary:
The Prevention of Lower Urinary Symptoms (PLUS) Research Consortium is working to optimize prevention of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in women and adolescent females across their life spans. The ability to measure bladder health and key risk and protective factors is crucial to the PLUS mission. To describe and measure the spectrum of bladder health in diverse populations, researchers need a valid and reliable instrument. To date, the Consortium's work on design of a bladder health instrument has been a culmination of expert opinion, information from focus groups, and incorporation of previously validated items and language where appropriate, along with cognitive interviews of participants from the general public. The next step in the consortium's work is to prospectively collect data to test and validate bladder health instrument (BHI) items for inclusion in a final bladder health scale (BHS) that can assess the full range of bladder health of women. This will be through a combination of general population recruitment for completing mailed surveys and clinical population recruitment for completing surveys and an in-person evaluation.

Condition or disease
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Study Design
Layout table for study information
Study Type : Observational
Estimated Enrollment : 1202 participants
Observational Model: Other
Time Perspective: Prospective
Official Title: Validation of Bladder Health Instrument for Evaluation in Women
Actual Study Start Date : July 31, 2019
Estimated Primary Completion Date : August 31, 2021
Estimated Study Completion Date : August 31, 2021
Arms and Interventions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Bladder Health Instrument [ Time Frame: Will be assessed throughout the duration of study, an average of one year. ]
    Multi-item measurement is used to assess the range of bladder health dimensions as defined by the model of bladder health adopted by the PLUS consortium. It is anticipated that the self-administeredBHI instrument (PAPI or CASI) will consist of approximately 85 items: 53-67 are items all respondents will be asked to answer, and 48 are asked only of women who self-identify as experiencing a specific LUTS. The items cover the range of bladder health dimensions specified by our model.


Eligibility Criteria
Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Sampling Method:   Probability Sample
Study Population
The BHI is intended for use in the general US population and it is critical that the BHI validation include individuals who meet these criteria. The goal is to include women over the age of 18 that meet the inclusion criteria. It is our hope to get a broad spectrum of women with varying degrees of bladder health, age, race, and community.
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Community dwelling
  • Age ≥18 years old
  • Female sex assigned at birth
  • Fluent in written and spoken English
  • Able to read and provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Institutional living arrangement, e.g., skilled nursing, long term care or rehabilitation center
  • Physical or mental condition that would prohibit self-administration of questionnaire either electronically or using paper and pencil (e.g., dementia/cognitive impairment/blindness/severe arthritis).
Contacts and Locations

Contacts
Layout table for location contacts
Contact: Melissa Constantine, PhD, MPAff 612-626-8454 cons0026@umn.edu
Contact: Abby Mengelkoch, BA 612-626-5467 mengel@umn.edu

Locations
Layout table for location information
United States, Alabama
University of Alabama at Birmingham Recruiting
Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35223
Contact: Clinical Trials Manager       laurieslay@uabmc.edu   
United States, California
University of California, San Diego Recruiting
San Diego, California, United States, 92121
Contact: Clinical Research Coordinator       kherrala@health.ucsd.edu   
United States, Connecticut
Yale University Active, not recruiting
New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06510
United States, Illinois
Loyola University Chicago Active, not recruiting
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60153
United States, Michigan
University of Michigan Recruiting
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
Contact: Project Manager       rutab@umich.edu   
United States, Minnesota
University of Minnesota Enrolling by invitation
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
United States, Missouri
Washington University School of Medicine Recruiting
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63100
Contact: Staff Scientist       plusstudy@wustl.edu   
United States, Pennsylvania
University of Pennsylvania Recruiting
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
Contact: Clinical Research Coordinator       hanna.stambakio@uphs.upenn.edu   
Sponsors and Collaborators
University of Minnesota
University of California, San Diego
University of Pennsylvania
Yale University
University of Michigan
University of Illinois at Chicago
Loyola University Chicago
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Washington University School of Medicine
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Melissa Constantine, PhD, MPAff University of Minnesota
Principal Investigator: Emily Lukacz, MD University of California, San Diego
Tracking Information
First Submitted Date July 5, 2019
First Posted Date July 11, 2019
Last Update Posted Date December 4, 2020
Actual Study Start Date July 31, 2019
Estimated Primary Completion Date August 31, 2021   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Current Primary Outcome Measures
 (submitted: July 10, 2019)
Bladder Health Instrument [ Time Frame: Will be assessed throughout the duration of study, an average of one year. ]
Multi-item measurement is used to assess the range of bladder health dimensions as defined by the model of bladder health adopted by the PLUS consortium. It is anticipated that the self-administeredBHI instrument (PAPI or CASI) will consist of approximately 85 items: 53-67 are items all respondents will be asked to answer, and 48 are asked only of women who self-identify as experiencing a specific LUTS. The items cover the range of bladder health dimensions specified by our model.
Original Primary Outcome Measures Same as current
Change History
Current Secondary Outcome Measures Not Provided
Original Secondary Outcome Measures Not Provided
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
 
Descriptive Information
Brief Title Validation of Bladder Health Instrument for Evaluation in Women
Official Title Validation of Bladder Health Instrument for Evaluation in Women
Brief Summary The Prevention of Lower Urinary Symptoms (PLUS) Research Consortium is working to optimize prevention of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in women and adolescent females across their life spans. The ability to measure bladder health and key risk and protective factors is crucial to the PLUS mission. To describe and measure the spectrum of bladder health in diverse populations, researchers need a valid and reliable instrument. To date, the Consortium's work on design of a bladder health instrument has been a culmination of expert opinion, information from focus groups, and incorporation of previously validated items and language where appropriate, along with cognitive interviews of participants from the general public. The next step in the consortium's work is to prospectively collect data to test and validate bladder health instrument (BHI) items for inclusion in a final bladder health scale (BHS) that can assess the full range of bladder health of women. This will be through a combination of general population recruitment for completing mailed surveys and clinical population recruitment for completing surveys and an in-person evaluation.
Detailed Description Not Provided
Study Type Observational
Study Design Observational Model: Other
Time Perspective: Prospective
Target Follow-Up Duration Not Provided
Biospecimen Not Provided
Sampling Method Probability Sample
Study Population The BHI is intended for use in the general US population and it is critical that the BHI validation include individuals who meet these criteria. The goal is to include women over the age of 18 that meet the inclusion criteria. It is our hope to get a broad spectrum of women with varying degrees of bladder health, age, race, and community.
Condition Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Intervention Not Provided
Study Groups/Cohorts Not Provided
Publications *
  • Lukacz ES, Bavendam TG, Berry A, Fok CS, Gahagan S, Goode PS, Hardacker CT, Hebert-Beirne J, Lewis CE, Lewis J, Low LK, Lowder JL, Palmer MH, Smith AL, Brady SS. A Novel Research Definition of Bladder Health in Women and Girls: Implications for Research and Public Health Promotion. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 Aug;27(8):974-981. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6786. Epub 2018 May 24.
  • Brady SS, Bavendam TG, Berry A, Fok CS, Gahagan S, Goode PS, Hardacker CT, Hebert-Beirne J, Lewis CE, Lewis JB, Kane Low L, Lowder JL, Palmer MH, Wyman JF, Lukacz ES; Prevention of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (PLUS) Research Consortium. The Prevention of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (PLUS) in girls and women: Developing a conceptual framework for a prevention research agenda. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Nov;37(8):2951-2964. doi: 10.1002/nau.23787. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
  • Bandilla W, Bosnjak M, Altdorfer P. Survey Administration Effects?: A Comparison of Web-Based and Traditional Written Self-Administered Surveys Using the ISSP Environment Module. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2003;21(2):235-243. doi:10.1177/0894439303021002009.
  • Dillman DA, Sangster RL, Tarnai J, Rockwood TH. Understanding differences in people's answers to telephone and mail surveys. New Dir Eval. 1996;1996(70):45-61. doi:10.1002/ev.1034.
  • Vernon SW, Tiro JA, Vojvodic RW, Coan S, Diamond PM, Greisinger A, Fernandez ME. Reliability and validity of a questionnaire to measure colorectal cancer screening behaviors: does mode of survey administration matter? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Apr;17(4):758-67. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2855. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
  • Schwarz N, Strack F, Hippler H, Bishop G. The impact of administration mode on response effects in survey measurement. Jobe JB, Loftus EF, eds. Appl Cogn Psychol. 1991;5(3):193-212. doi:10.1002/acp.2350050304.
  • Cronbach L. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297-334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555.
  • Swartz RJ, de Moor C, Cook KF, Fouladi RT, Basen-Engquist K, Eng C, Carmack Taylor CL. Mode effects in the center for epidemiologic studies depression (CES-D) scale: personal digital assistant vs. paper and pencil administration. Qual Life Res. 2007 Jun;16(5):803-13. Epub 2007 Feb 13.
  • Messick S. The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. ETS Res Rep Ser. 1992;1992(1):i-42. doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.1992.tb01470.x.
  • Kane MT. Validating the Interpretations and Uses of Test Scores. J Educ Meas. 2013;50(1):1-73. doi:10.1111/jedm.12000.
  • Hawkins M, Elsworth GR, Osborne RH. Application of validity theory and methodology to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): building an argument for validity. Qual Life Res. 2018 Jul;27(7):1695-1710. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1815-6. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
  • American Educational Research Association. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. (Association AP, Education NC on M in, (U.S.) JC on S for E and PT, eds.). Washington, DC: Washington, DC : American Educational Research Association; 2014.
  • Streiner D. Health Measurement Scales : A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. Fifth edit. (Norman GR, Cairney J, ebrary I, eds.). New York, New York: New York, New York : Oxford University Press; 2015.
  • Messick S. VALIDITY. Educ Test Serv Res Rep Ser. 1987;1987(2):i-208. doi:10.1002/j.2330-8516.1987.tb00244.x.
  • CAMPBELL DT, FISKE DW. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull. 1959 Mar;56(2):81-105.
  • Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK, Drake P. Births: Final Data for 2017. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2018 Nov;67(8):1-50.
  • Chin HB, Baird DD, McConnaughey DR, Weinberg CR, Wilcox AJ, Jukic AM. Long-term Recall of Pregnancy-related Events. Epidemiology. 2017 Jul;28(4):575-579. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000660.
  • McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993 Mar;31(3):247-63.
  • Kelleher CJ, Cardozo LD, Khullar V, Salvatore S. A new questionnaire to assess the quality of life of urinary incontinent women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Dec;104(12):1374-9.
  • Naughton MJ, Donovan J, Badia X, Corcos J, Gotoh M, Kelleher C, Lukacs B, Shaw C. Symptom severity and QOL scales for urinary incontinence. Gastroenterology. 2004 Jan;126(1 Suppl 1):S114-23. Review.
  • Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;193(1):103-13.
  • Jackson S, Donovan J, Brookes S, Eckford S, Swithinbank L, Abrams P. The Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms questionnaire: development and psychometric testing. Br J Urol. 1996 Jun;77(6):805-12.
  • Miller JM, Ashton-Miller JA, Delancey JO. Quantification of cough-related urine loss using the paper towel test. Obstet Gynecol. 1998 May;91(5 Pt 1):705-9.
  • Gorsuch RL. Common Factor Analysis versus Component Analysis: Some Well and Little Known Facts. Multivariate Behav Res. 1990 Jan 1;25(1):33-9. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2501_3.
  • Lukacz ES, Constantine ML, Kane Low L, Lowder JL, Markland AD, Mueller ER, Newman DK, Rickey LM, Rockwood T, Rudser K; Prevention of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (PLUS) Research Consortium. Rationale and design of the validation of bladder health instrument for evaluation in women (VIEW) protocol. BMC Womens Health. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-01136-w.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruitment Information
Recruitment Status Recruiting
Estimated Enrollment
 (submitted: July 10, 2019)
1202
Original Estimated Enrollment Same as current
Estimated Study Completion Date August 31, 2021
Estimated Primary Completion Date August 31, 2021   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Community dwelling
  • Age ≥18 years old
  • Female sex assigned at birth
  • Fluent in written and spoken English
  • Able to read and provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Institutional living arrangement, e.g., skilled nursing, long term care or rehabilitation center
  • Physical or mental condition that would prohibit self-administration of questionnaire either electronically or using paper and pencil (e.g., dementia/cognitive impairment/blindness/severe arthritis).
Sex/Gender
Sexes Eligible for Study: Female
Ages 18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers Yes
Contacts
Contact: Melissa Constantine, PhD, MPAff 612-626-8454 cons0026@umn.edu
Contact: Abby Mengelkoch, BA 612-626-5467 mengel@umn.edu
Listed Location Countries United States
Removed Location Countries  
 
Administrative Information
NCT Number NCT04016298
Other Study ID Numbers Pro00032238
Has Data Monitoring Committee No
U.S. FDA-regulated Product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
IPD Sharing Statement Not Provided
Responsible Party University of Minnesota
Study Sponsor University of Minnesota
Collaborators
  • University of California, San Diego
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Yale University
  • University of Michigan
  • University of Illinois at Chicago
  • Loyola University Chicago
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • Washington University School of Medicine
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Melissa Constantine, PhD, MPAff University of Minnesota
Principal Investigator: Emily Lukacz, MD University of California, San Diego
PRS Account University of Minnesota
Verification Date December 2020

治疗医院