• Motor Activity Log [ Time Frame: Patients were examined at baseline ]
  Motor Activity Log is developed to determine the frequency and quality of use of the affected arm It consists of two scales that question how often the affected side's upper extremity is used for each activity during the 28-day activity (Usage Quantity Scale) and how well it can perform the activity if it uses it. On both scales, the patient scores between 0-5. The score that can be obtained is between 0-5 points and the high score indicates good frequency of use and good quality of movement.
• Motor Activity Log [ Time Frame: Patients were examined 2 weeks after baseline ]
  Motor Activity Log is developed to determine the frequency and quality of use of the affected arm It consists of two scales that question how often the affected side's upper extremity is used for each activity during the 28-day activity (Usage Quantity Scale) and how well it can perform the activity if it uses it. On both scales, the patient scores between 0-5. The score that can be obtained is between 0-5 points and the high score indicates good frequency of use and good quality of movement.
• Motor Activity Log [ Time Frame: Patients were examined 3 months after baseline ]
  Motor Activity Log is developed to determine the frequency and quality of use of the affected arm It consists of two scales that question how often the affected side's upper extremity is used for each activity during the 28-day activity (Usage Quantity Scale) and how well it can perform the activity if it uses it. On both scales, the patient scores between 0-5. The score that can be obtained is between 0-5 points and the high score indicates good frequency of use and good quality of movement.
• Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale [ Time Frame: Patients were examined at baseline ]
  The Fugl-Meyer Motor Rating Scale, which assesses strength, reflexes and coordination, reflects the stages of motor development. In the evaluation, each item is scored over 2 points. In the upper extremity assessment, 53-66 points are considered as full capacity, 48-52 points are defined as capacity, 32-47 points are considered as limited capacity, and 31 points are considered as under-capacity.
• Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale [ Time Frame: Patients were examined 2 weeks after baseline ]
  The Fugl-Meyer Motor Rating Scale, which assesses strength, reflexes and coordination, reflects the stages of motor development. In the evaluation, each item is scored over 2 points. In the upper extremity assessment, 53-66 points are considered as full capacity, 48-52 points are defined as capacity, 32-47 points are considered as limited capacity, and 31 points are considered as under-capacity.
• Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale [ Time Frame: Patients were examined 3 months after baseline ]
  The Fugl-Meyer Motor Rating Scale, which assesses strength, reflexes and coordination, reflects the stages of motor development. In the evaluation, each item is scored over 2 points. In the upper extremity assessment, 53-66 points are considered as full capacity, 48-52 points are defined as capacity, 32-47 points are considered as limited capacity, and 31 points are considered as under-capacity.
• Box-Block Test [ Time Frame: Patients were examined at baseline ]
  Box-Block Test
• Box-Block Test [ Time Frame: Patients were examined 2 weeks after baseline ]
  Box-Block Test
• Box-Block Test [ Time Frame: Patients were examined 3 months after baseline ]
  Box-Block Test
• exercise assessment parameters-cubes lined [ Time Frame: Patients were examined at baseline ]
  cubes lined in 30 seconds
• exercise assessment parameters-cubes lined [ Time Frame: Patients were examined 2 weeks after baseline ]
  cubes lined in 30 seconds
• exercise assessment parameters-cubes lined [ Time Frame: Patients were examined 3 months after baseline ]
  cubes lined in 30 seconds
• exercise assessment parameters-card turned [ Time Frame: Patients were examined at baseline ]
  card turned in 30 seconds
• exercise assessment parameters-card turned [ Time Frame: Patients were examined 2 weeks after baseline ]
  card turned in 30 seconds
• exercise assessment parameters-card turned [ Time Frame: Patients were examined 3 months after baseline ]
  card turned in 30 seconds
• exercise assessment parameters-object gripped [ Time Frame: Patients were examined at baseline ]
  object gripped in 30 seconds
• exercise assessment parameters-object gripped [ Time Frame: Patients were examined 2 weeks after baseline ]
  object gripped in 30 seconds
• exercise assessment parameters-object gripped [ Time Frame: Patients were examined 3 months after baseline ]
  object gripped in 30 seconds
• exercise assessment parameters-water [ Time Frame: Patients were examined at baseline ]
  time it takes to grip and carry a water filled glass to their mouth and putting it back
• exercise assessment parameters-water [ Time Frame: Patients were examined 2 weeks after baseline ]
  time it takes to grip and carry a water filled glass to their mouth and putting it back
• exercise assessment parameters-water [ Time Frame: Patients were examined 3 months after baseline ]
  time it takes to grip and carry a water filled glass to their mouth and putting it back

• Stroke Impact Scale [ Time Frame: Patients were examined at baseline ]
  Stroke Impact Scale 3,0; The aim of the study is to evaluate the perception of the quality of life after stroke by the patients themselves or their caregivers. It is a stroke-specific, patient-centered quality of life measure. It consists of 8 subsections and 59 questions. Each question is scored by evaluating the difficulty experienced in the last week on a 5-point scale. It also includes the assessment of post-stroke recovery perception with a visual analog scale of 0-100 points (0: no improvement, 100: complete recovery)
• Stroke Impact Scale [ Time Frame: Patients were examined 2 weeks after baseline ]
  Stroke Impact Scale 3,0; The aim of the study is to evaluate the perception of the quality of life after stroke by the patients themselves or their caregivers. It is a stroke-specific, patient-centered quality of life measure. It consists of 8 subsections and 59 questions. Each question is scored by evaluating the difficulty experienced in the last week on a 5-point scale. It also includes the assessment of post-stroke recovery perception with a visual analog scale of 0-100 points (0: no improvement, 100: complete recovery)
• Stroke Impact Scale [ Time Frame: Patients were examined 3 months after baseline ]
  Stroke Impact Scale 3,0; The aim of the study is to evaluate the perception of the quality of life after stroke by the patients themselves or their caregivers. It is a stroke-specific, patient-centered quality of life measure. It consists of 8 subsections and 59 questions. Each question is scored by evaluating the difficulty experienced in the last week on a 5-point scale. It also includes the assessment of post-stroke recovery perception with a visual analog scale of 0-100 points (0: no improvement, 100: complete recovery)

For the rehabilitation of the paretic upper extremity, the use of constraint induced movement therapy and the use of modified constraint induced movement therapy are the most effective treatment strategies. The investigators aimed To analyze effect of modified constraint induced movement therapy on upper extremity functions and quality of life of subacute and chronic phase stroke patients with right/left hemisphere damage.

A total of 40 patients (20 patients with right hemiplegia and 20 patients with left hemiplegia) were enrolled in our prospective, randomized and controlled trial. Patients were randomized in to three groups. The first group consists of 10 right hemiplegia patients and the second group consists of 10 left hemiplegia patients. First and second group of patients had 10 sessions of constraint induced movement therapy as groups of 4, 5 days a week. Each patient had modified constraint induced movement therapy 1 hour a day with professional support and performed home program by themselves 3 hours a day. Patients' less affected hands were limited by the help of a glove %50 of the time they were awake. 10 patients with right hemiplegia and 10 patients with left hemiplegia formed the control group and these patients were in line for inpatient rehabilitation programme. Patients were examined before treatment, just after treatment and 3 months after treatment using Box-Block Test, cubes lined, card turned and object gripped in 30 seconds, time it takes to grip and carry a water filled glass to their mouth and putting it back, Motor Activity Log (MAL), Stroke Impact Scale, Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test and Friedman test were used for intragroup comparison of data and Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare data between groups.

• Experimental: left hemiplegia
  Patients in the left hemiplegia group had 10 sessions of constraint induced movement therapy as groups of 4, 5 days a week. Each patient had modified constraint induced movement therapy 1 hour a day with professional support and performed home program by themselves 3 hours a day. Patients' less affected hands were limited by the help of a glove %50 of the time they were awake
  Intervention: Other: Modified Constraint Induced Movement Therapy
• Experimental: right hemiplegia
  Patients in the right hemiplegia group had 10 sessions of constraint induced movement therapy as groups of 4, 5 days a week. Each patient had modified constraint induced movement therapy 1 hour a day with professional support and performed home program by themselves 3 hours a day. Patients' less affected hands were limited by the help of a glove %50 of the time they were awake
  Intervention: Other: Modified Constraint Induced Movement Therapy
• No Intervention: control
  10 patients with right hemiplegia and 10 patients with left hemiplegia formed the control group and these patients were in line for inpatient rehabilitation programme.

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients in subacute and chronic period (3 months after stroke)
• Modified Ashworth scale in the hemiplegic arm with 3 or more spasticity
• No pain in the hemiplegic arm
• MMSE 20 and above
• Without major medical problems
• No previous stroke history
• Adequate stability to walk when healthy arm is immobilized
• Active 20 degrees wrist extension and 10 degrees interphalangeal and metacarpophalangeal extension (these movements should be repeated 3 times in 1 minute)

Exclusion Criteria:

• Bilateral stroke or brainstem affected
• Active 20-degree wrist extension and 10-degree interphalangeal and metacarpophalangeal extension
• Global aphasia or cognitive disorders that may affect understanding of test instructions
• Patients with major medical problems that may affect participation
• Existence of neglect