Patients with severe strokes are often unable to be take oral diet food and fluids safely because they cannot swallow effectively. Therefore, patients need to be fed via a tube placed through the nose into the stomach (nasogastric tube). Tube feeding can be given by the intermittent (bolus) method, whereby the feed is given over a short time (15 to 30 minutes), or by the continuous feeding method, where the feed is given continuously over 10-16 hours. Nasogastric feeding can be complicated by vomiting or reflux of the feed into the oesophagus causing aspiration of gastric contents into the lung and pneumonia. Nasogastric feeds can be given continuously or as bolus feeds. Healthy people eating normally take their diet in discrete meals. The human digestive system is adapted to intermittent food intake and is likely to work best if food is provided in this pattern, but the larger volume of the feed by this method may cause vomiting and aspiration. It is unclear which method is better for allowing normal digestive processes and reducing pneumonia due to aspirated feeds. There are no trials comparing these two feeding methods in patients with acute stroke. The aim of this small study is to determine if a trial comparing the two treatment approaches is feasible in patients with acute stroke, and to collect information on the effects on feed tolerance and digestion.
In this study we will compare the effect of the bolus and intermittent nasogastric tube feeding on digestion and feed tolerance in 20 patients who need nasogastric feeding within 36 hours of a stroke. Patients will be randomly allocated to be given the feeds either by the bolus or by the continuous method for 7 days. During this time they will be examined every day. The study will examine how effectively food is digested by measuring the amount of feed given and the metabolic responses of the body by looking at changes in the level of blood sugar and digestive hormones. The investigators will also monitor complications such as vomiting, diarrhoea, and pneumonia. Patients will be randomly allocated to be given the feeds either by the bolus or by the continuous method for 7 days.
This will provide information which will allow the investigators to design a larger definitive study to conclusively prove which method is more appropriate.
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Stroke Dysphagia | Dietary Supplement: bolus NGT feeding Dietary Supplement: Continuous NGT feeding Diagnostic Test: Continuous Glucose Monitoring Diagnostic Test: Metabolic Profile Radiation: Chest X-ray | Not Applicable |
Show detailed description
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Estimated Enrollment : | 30 participants |
| Allocation: | Randomized |
| Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
| Intervention Model Description: | 20 patients will be randomised to two arms with a control group of a further 10 patients |
| Masking: | None (Open Label) |
| Primary Purpose: | Prevention |
| Official Title: | The Relative Effectiveness of BOLUS Versus Continuous Nasogastric Feeding After Stroke: a Proof of Principal Study |
| Estimated Study Start Date : | April 1, 2020 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date : | November 2020 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date : | December 2020 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Intervention
bolus NGT feeding
|
Dietary Supplement: bolus NGT feeding
Participants randomised to bolus NGT feeding will receive this for 7 days at mealtimes
Diagnostic Test: Continuous Glucose Monitoring Both participant groups will have continuous glucose monitoring performed for 5 days while in the study
Diagnostic Test: Metabolic Profile Bloods will be taken to assess all patients metabolic profile
Radiation: Chest X-ray A chest X-ray will be performed on patients receiving study interventions on day 7 to confirm/exclude pneumonia
|
|
Control
Continuous NGT feeding (standard care)
|
Dietary Supplement: Continuous NGT feeding
Participants randomised to bolus NGT feeding will receive this continuously for 7 days as per hospital protocol
Diagnostic Test: Metabolic Profile Bloods will be taken to assess all patients metabolic profile
Radiation: Chest X-ray A chest X-ray will be performed on patients receiving study interventions on day 7 to confirm/exclude pneumonia
|
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
| Contact: Heather Reidy | 01782 675398 | heather.reidy@uhnm.nhs.uk | |
| Contact: Jane Copestick | 01782 675616 | jane.copestick@uhnm.nhs.uk |
| United Kingdom | |
| University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust | |
| Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, United Kingdom, ST4 6QG | |
| Contact: Heather Reidy 01782 675398 heather.reidy@uhnm.nhs.uk | |
| Contact: Jane Copestick 01782 675616 jane.copestick@uhnm.nhs.uk | |
| Principal Investigator: Fahmy Hanna | |
| Principal Investigator: | Fahmy Hanna | Consultant |
| Tracking Information | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Submitted Date ICMJE | March 12, 2019 | ||||||||
| First Posted Date ICMJE | July 8, 2019 | ||||||||
| Last Update Posted Date | February 17, 2020 | ||||||||
| Estimated Study Start Date ICMJE | April 1, 2020 | ||||||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | November 2020 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Feed tolerance [ Time Frame: 7 days ] Total of 7 points. 7/7 full tolerance, 0/7 severe intolerance. This is based on Nutrition, Vomiting, Diarrhoea, Bloating, Abdominal pain, Pneumonia and raised inflammatory markers
|
||||||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||
| Change History | |||||||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||
| Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | The Relative Effectiveness of BOLUS Versus Continuous Nasogastric Feeding After Stroke: a Proof of Principal Study | ||||||||
| Official Title ICMJE | The Relative Effectiveness of BOLUS Versus Continuous Nasogastric Feeding After Stroke: a Proof of Principal Study | ||||||||
| Brief Summary |
Patients with severe strokes are often unable to be take oral diet food and fluids safely because they cannot swallow effectively. Therefore, patients need to be fed via a tube placed through the nose into the stomach (nasogastric tube). Tube feeding can be given by the intermittent (bolus) method, whereby the feed is given over a short time (15 to 30 minutes), or by the continuous feeding method, where the feed is given continuously over 10-16 hours. Nasogastric feeding can be complicated by vomiting or reflux of the feed into the oesophagus causing aspiration of gastric contents into the lung and pneumonia. Nasogastric feeds can be given continuously or as bolus feeds. Healthy people eating normally take their diet in discrete meals. The human digestive system is adapted to intermittent food intake and is likely to work best if food is provided in this pattern, but the larger volume of the feed by this method may cause vomiting and aspiration. It is unclear which method is better for allowing normal digestive processes and reducing pneumonia due to aspirated feeds. There are no trials comparing these two feeding methods in patients with acute stroke. The aim of this small study is to determine if a trial comparing the two treatment approaches is feasible in patients with acute stroke, and to collect information on the effects on feed tolerance and digestion. In this study we will compare the effect of the bolus and intermittent nasogastric tube feeding on digestion and feed tolerance in 20 patients who need nasogastric feeding within 36 hours of a stroke. Patients will be randomly allocated to be given the feeds either by the bolus or by the continuous method for 7 days. During this time they will be examined every day. The study will examine how effectively food is digested by measuring the amount of feed given and the metabolic responses of the body by looking at changes in the level of blood sugar and digestive hormones. The investigators will also monitor complications such as vomiting, diarrhoea, and pneumonia. Patients will be randomly allocated to be given the feeds either by the bolus or by the continuous method for 7 days. This will provide information which will allow the investigators to design a larger definitive study to conclusively prove which method is more appropriate. |
||||||||
| Detailed Description |
Patients admitted to the acute stroke unit at University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust and who require nasogastric (NG) feeding will be eligible for recruitment, patients will be screened and assessed for eligibility on the stroke unit by a member of the local research team, confirmed by a medical practitioner. Consent- Informed consent will be sought from patients after full oral and written information about the nature and purpose of the study, potential risks and benefits, alternative treatments, and the right to refuse and to withdraw at any time. In cases where the patient lacks the capacity to give fully informed consent, the patient will be informed as much as he/she is able to understand with the option to refuse, and fully informed consent will be sought from a consultee. The oral and written information will be provided to the consultee including the same information as would be given to the patient. If the patient has capacity to consent for themselves, but unable to sign because of impairments; verbal consent, witnessed and signed by an independent observer, will be documented. Where the patient has capacity to consent for themselves, but only able to make a mark on the paper rather than sign as required, the same procedure will be followed. Confirmation of consent will be sought in patients who are recruited with consent from a consultee, but regain capacity prior to the end of the trial. Due to the nature of the study, patients or their consultee will have to decide within a few hours of admission to hospital. They will be given the opportunity to discuss the study with a relative or friend. Participants or their consultee will be free to withdraw from the trial at any time without giving reasons and without prejudicing further treatment. An age-matched healthy control group will be recruited from patients' relatives and friends to provide a normal baseline for the metabolic response to normal feeding. The original signed consent form will be filed in the case report form. One copy will be given to the patient or consultee, another copy will be sent to the trial coordinating centre and another will be filed in the patients' notes. The participant information sheets, and consent forms, will not be available in other languages. If needed, the usual hospital interpreter and translator services will be available to assist with discussion of the trial. If a participant is able to consent for the study but later becomes incapacitated, the original consent will endure the loss of capacity as long as the trial has not significantly altered since the original consent was given. Randomisation- Participants will be randomized into the intervention or control groups using a computerized random number generator. The randomization procedure will be conducted by an independent statistician at Keele University. Sealed and numbered opaque envelopes containing the allocated intervention will be kept in the research office on the acute stroke ward. For each randomisation the envelope with the lowest number will be used. The envelopes will be selected and opened by the research nurse following consent and baseline assessment. An email containing the Participant ID and the number of the envelope will be sent to the Principal Investigator. A copy of the original randomisation codes will be kept independently by the sponsor in the Trial Master File. Assessments-
|
||||||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||||||
| Study Phase ICMJE | Not Applicable | ||||||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Intervention Model Description: 20 patients will be randomised to two arms with a control group of a further 10 patients Masking: None (Open Label)Primary Purpose: Prevention |
||||||||
| Condition ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Study Arms ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Publications * | Not Provided | ||||||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Not yet recruiting | ||||||||
| Estimated Enrollment ICMJE |
30 | ||||||||
| Original Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||
| Estimated Study Completion Date ICMJE | December 2020 | ||||||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | November 2020 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||||||
| Sex/Gender ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Ages ICMJE | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) | ||||||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE | Yes | ||||||||
| Contacts ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Listed Location Countries ICMJE | United Kingdom | ||||||||
| Removed Location Countries | |||||||||
| Administrative Information | |||||||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT04011787 | ||||||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | 1437 | ||||||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||||||
| U.S. FDA-regulated Product |
|
||||||||
| IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Responsible Party | University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust | ||||||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust | ||||||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| PRS Account | University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust | ||||||||
| Verification Date | July 2019 | ||||||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||||||