Surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma offers the only possibility of long-term survival, but remains a formidable undertaking. Traditionally, 90 day post-operative complications and death have been used to define operative risk. However, there is concern that this metric may not accurately capture long-term morbidity after such complex surgery.
This is a retrospective review of a prospective database of patients undergoing surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma at a Western centre between 2009-2017.
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Cholangiocarcinoma Surgery--Complications | Procedure: Resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma |
Cholangiocarcinoma is an uncommon cancer, but is the second commonest primary hepatic tumour after hepatocellular carcinoma. Its incidence is rising globally with 1200 cases per year in England & Wales. Tumours may originate within the liver itself, although the majority arise at the confluence of the hepatic ducts (perihilar tumours). Surgery is the only potentially curative treatment, but remains a formidable undertaking usually requiring a major liver resection to achieve the clear surgical margins that are essential for long-term survival, followed by complex biliary reconstruction. The magnitude of this surgery is reflected in an operative mortality reported between 10-15% in most Western centres. In addition, almost half the patients suffer major complications prior to discharge from hospital.
Following such surgery, around 30-40% of patients are alive after 5 years. However, a significant minority succumb to rapid disease recurrence, with a third dying within the first year after resection. Although offering no hope of cure, systemic chemotherapy with cisplatin/gemcitabine offers a median overall survival of 11.7 months. For patients planned to undergo surgery, but found to have locally advanced and therefore irresectable disease at laparotomy, median survival with palliative chemotherapy can reach 16 months with 10% of patients alive 3 years later. It therefore seems likely that a proportion of patients undergo major surgery, at significant risk of immediate postoperative mortality or morbidity, when they may be better served by systemic chemotherapy.
Operative morbidity and mortality has traditionally been reported as death or complication occurring within the first 30 days after surgery. However, it is now clear that this 30-day cut-off underestimates the morbidity and mortality after hepatic resection with ninety-day morbidity and mortality increasingly recognised as a more appropriate measure of postoperative outcome after liver surgery. There is also a lack of evidence on the impact that contemporary enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programmes may have on these outcomes.
The unique characteristics of the complex and demanding surgery required for resection of this disease means there is also a possibility of long-term complications beyond 90-days. To date, the long-term morbidity after resection has not been reported. These data are essential to allow patients to make fully informed decisions around the risks and benefits of surgery.
This study therefore aimed to characterise the long-term morbidity after resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma managed with an ERAS programme in a Western centre.
Study Type : | Observational |
Actual Enrollment : | 60 participants |
Observational Model: | Cohort |
Time Perspective: | Retrospective |
Official Title: | Long-term Morbidity After Surgery for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma; a Cohort Study |
Actual Study Start Date : | January 2009 |
Actual Primary Completion Date : | October 2017 |
Actual Study Completion Date : | October 2017 |
Tracking Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date | June 21, 2019 | ||||
First Posted Date | June 26, 2019 | ||||
Last Update Posted Date | July 1, 2019 | ||||
Actual Study Start Date | January 2009 | ||||
Actual Primary Completion Date | October 2017 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Current Primary Outcome Measures |
Perioperative morbidity [ Time Frame: 30 day ] Clavien-Dindo complication index
|
||||
Original Primary Outcome Measures | Same as current | ||||
Change History | |||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures |
Perioperative morbidity [ Time Frame: 90 day ] Clavien-Dindo complication index
|
||||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures | Same as current | ||||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||
Descriptive Information | |||||
Brief Title | Long-term Morbidity After Surgery for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma | ||||
Official Title | Long-term Morbidity After Surgery for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma; a Cohort Study | ||||
Brief Summary |
Surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma offers the only possibility of long-term survival, but remains a formidable undertaking. Traditionally, 90 day post-operative complications and death have been used to define operative risk. However, there is concern that this metric may not accurately capture long-term morbidity after such complex surgery. This is a retrospective review of a prospective database of patients undergoing surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma at a Western centre between 2009-2017. |
||||
Detailed Description |
Cholangiocarcinoma is an uncommon cancer, but is the second commonest primary hepatic tumour after hepatocellular carcinoma. Its incidence is rising globally with 1200 cases per year in England & Wales. Tumours may originate within the liver itself, although the majority arise at the confluence of the hepatic ducts (perihilar tumours). Surgery is the only potentially curative treatment, but remains a formidable undertaking usually requiring a major liver resection to achieve the clear surgical margins that are essential for long-term survival, followed by complex biliary reconstruction. The magnitude of this surgery is reflected in an operative mortality reported between 10-15% in most Western centres. In addition, almost half the patients suffer major complications prior to discharge from hospital. Following such surgery, around 30-40% of patients are alive after 5 years. However, a significant minority succumb to rapid disease recurrence, with a third dying within the first year after resection. Although offering no hope of cure, systemic chemotherapy with cisplatin/gemcitabine offers a median overall survival of 11.7 months. For patients planned to undergo surgery, but found to have locally advanced and therefore irresectable disease at laparotomy, median survival with palliative chemotherapy can reach 16 months with 10% of patients alive 3 years later. It therefore seems likely that a proportion of patients undergo major surgery, at significant risk of immediate postoperative mortality or morbidity, when they may be better served by systemic chemotherapy. Operative morbidity and mortality has traditionally been reported as death or complication occurring within the first 30 days after surgery. However, it is now clear that this 30-day cut-off underestimates the morbidity and mortality after hepatic resection with ninety-day morbidity and mortality increasingly recognised as a more appropriate measure of postoperative outcome after liver surgery. There is also a lack of evidence on the impact that contemporary enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programmes may have on these outcomes. The unique characteristics of the complex and demanding surgery required for resection of this disease means there is also a possibility of long-term complications beyond 90-days. To date, the long-term morbidity after resection has not been reported. These data are essential to allow patients to make fully informed decisions around the risks and benefits of surgery. This study therefore aimed to characterise the long-term morbidity after resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma managed with an ERAS programme in a Western centre. |
||||
Study Type | Observational | ||||
Study Design | Observational Model: Cohort Time Perspective: Retrospective |
||||
Target Follow-Up Duration | Not Provided | ||||
Biospecimen | Not Provided | ||||
Sampling Method | Non-Probability Sample | ||||
Study Population | Patients undergoing resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma at University Hospital Aintree between January 2009 and October 2017 were identified using a prospectively maintained database. | ||||
Condition |
|
||||
Intervention | Procedure: Resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma
Resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma
|
||||
Study Groups/Cohorts | Not Provided | ||||
Publications * | Not Provided | ||||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
Recruitment Information | |||||
Recruitment Status | Completed | ||||
Actual Enrollment |
60 | ||||
Original Actual Enrollment | Same as current | ||||
Actual Study Completion Date | October 2017 | ||||
Actual Primary Completion Date | October 2017 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Eligibility Criteria |
Inclusion Criteria: •Macroscopically complete resection of Bismuth 2-4 (peri)hilar cholangiocarcinoma with curative intent Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
Sex/Gender |
|
||||
Ages | Child, Adult, Older Adult | ||||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||
Contacts | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||
Listed Location Countries | Not Provided | ||||
Removed Location Countries | |||||
Administrative Information | |||||
NCT Number | NCT03999593 | ||||
Other Study ID Numbers | 0001 | ||||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product |
|
||||
IPD Sharing Statement |
|
||||
Responsible Party | Robert Jones, University of Liverpool | ||||
Study Sponsor | University of Liverpool | ||||
Collaborators | Not Provided | ||||
Investigators |
|
||||
PRS Account | University of Liverpool | ||||
Verification Date | June 2019 |