Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Thoracic Surgery Chronic Pain Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Neuromodulation | Device: active TMS Device: sham TMS | Not Applicable |
More than 25 million adults suffer from chronic pain in the United States making it the single most common symptom for which patients seek medical care. Although chronic pain can develop from a variety conditions, surgery is one of the most common and the incidence of chronic pain after thoracic surgery is particularly high. Opioids have been a mainstay therapy for post-surgical pain, but there is increasing awareness that post-surgical opioid use is a risk factor for addiction. Consequently, there are major nationwide efforts underway to limit opioid use in the post-surgical setting and identify safer options. One promising modality that has emerged in recent years is the use of non-invasive brain stimulation using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).
TMS provides a method for noninvasively modulating cortical excitability, and a number of studies have shown that non-invasive neuromodulation can reduce pain in patients suffering from chronic pain. Using resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging, the investigators propose to investigate changes in brain networks after TMS and additionally investigate individual differences in brain network connectivity patterns that predict the effectiveness of TMS. The investigators expect that active TMS, compared to sham TMS, will normalize brain network connectivity and lead to lower pain and opioid use after surgery. In addition, by assessing pre-surgical brain networks, the investigators hope to identify brain connectivity patterns that predict efficacy of TMS as a post-surgical treatment option.
The investigators will recruit 36 subjects who've undergone thoracic surgery. The investigators will recruit primarily in-patients but may also recruit patients who have gone home after surgery.
During weeks 2-3 Post-Surgery, 5 study visits will be completed, each ranging in duration from 1 1/2 - 3 hours. All 5 visits include 2 short TMS sessions (10 total), pain and mood assessments. At V1 and V5, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans will be completed, as well as additional pain and health related assessments (many only done at V1). Also, short, follow-up phone calls will be completed at 3 and 6 months post-surgery to assess pain and other outcomes.
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Actual Enrollment : | 0 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor) |
Masking Description: | Patients will be randomized to active TMS vs sham TMS groups with approximately a 2:1 ratio. At the end of the study, the investigators expect 24 patients to have active TMS and 12 patients to have sham TMS sessions. Patients in the sham TMS group will have appointments at the same time as the active TMS patients. The TMS device used for the sham TMS group patients will be identical to the active TMS group. Only the stimulation will be different. |
Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
Official Title: | Personalized Neuromodulation for Treating Post-surgical Pain |
Estimated Study Start Date : | February 1, 2021 |
Actual Primary Completion Date : | May 19, 2021 |
Actual Study Completion Date : | May 19, 2021 |
Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Active TMS
Patients in the active TMS group will receive active TMS 2 times a day for 5 days. In addition, these patients will have MRI before the first TMS session and after the last TMS session.
|
Device: active TMS
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
|
Sham Comparator: Sham TMS
Patients in the shamTMS group will receive sham TMS 2 times a day for 5 days. In addition, these patients will have MRI before the first TMS session and after the last TMS session.
|
Device: sham TMS
Sham transcranial magnetic stimulation
|
The change in pain score will be calculated based on the following 2 pain scores:
Day 1 NRS is the severity of pain collected at the beginning of the first study visit before the TMS and MRI sessions.
Day 5 NRS is the severity of pain collected at the end of the 5th study visit, after the second TMS and the MRI session.
The change in pain score is the difference between the day 5 NRS and the day 1 NRS.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
United States, Iowa | |
University of Iowa | |
Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52242 |
Principal Investigator: | Emine O Bayman | University of Iowa | |
Principal Investigator: | Jatin Vaidya, PhD | University of Iowa |
Tracking Information | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date ICMJE | June 19, 2019 | ||||||
First Posted Date ICMJE | June 21, 2019 | ||||||
Last Update Posted Date | May 24, 2021 | ||||||
Estimated Study Start Date ICMJE | February 1, 2021 | ||||||
Actual Primary Completion Date | May 19, 2021 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||
Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
The change in the severity of pain score after 5 days of active vs sham TMS. [ Time Frame: 5 days ] The change in pain score will be calculated based on the following 2 pain scores:
Day 1 NRS is the severity of pain collected at the beginning of the first study visit before the TMS and MRI sessions.
Day 5 NRS is the severity of pain collected at the end of the 5th study visit, after the second TMS and the MRI session.
The change in pain score is the difference between the day 5 NRS and the day 1 NRS.
|
||||||
Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||
Change History | |||||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
The presence of thoracic surgery related chronic pain at 6 months after surgery. [ Time Frame: 6 months after thoracic surgery ] Pain assessments at 6 months aftger surgery will be made with phone interview. Patients will be asked if they still have pain related to their thoracic surgery ('Do you currently have pain related to your thoracic surgery? [yes/ no]')
|
||||||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||||
Descriptive Information | |||||||
Brief Title ICMJE | Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) for Thoracic Surgery | ||||||
Official Title ICMJE | Personalized Neuromodulation for Treating Post-surgical Pain | ||||||
Brief Summary | Patients with high severity of post-surgical pain scores will be randomized to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) vs sham TMS groups. Both group of patients will have 10 TMS sessions during 5 days. Our hypothesis is that, the reduction in the severity of pain scores will be greater among those patients who are randomized to active TMS group compared to sham TMS group. The investigators will explore how improvements in pain correlate with changes in brain network connectivity. | ||||||
Detailed Description |
More than 25 million adults suffer from chronic pain in the United States making it the single most common symptom for which patients seek medical care. Although chronic pain can develop from a variety conditions, surgery is one of the most common and the incidence of chronic pain after thoracic surgery is particularly high. Opioids have been a mainstay therapy for post-surgical pain, but there is increasing awareness that post-surgical opioid use is a risk factor for addiction. Consequently, there are major nationwide efforts underway to limit opioid use in the post-surgical setting and identify safer options. One promising modality that has emerged in recent years is the use of non-invasive brain stimulation using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). TMS provides a method for noninvasively modulating cortical excitability, and a number of studies have shown that non-invasive neuromodulation can reduce pain in patients suffering from chronic pain. Using resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging, the investigators propose to investigate changes in brain networks after TMS and additionally investigate individual differences in brain network connectivity patterns that predict the effectiveness of TMS. The investigators expect that active TMS, compared to sham TMS, will normalize brain network connectivity and lead to lower pain and opioid use after surgery. In addition, by assessing pre-surgical brain networks, the investigators hope to identify brain connectivity patterns that predict efficacy of TMS as a post-surgical treatment option. The investigators will recruit 36 subjects who've undergone thoracic surgery. The investigators will recruit primarily in-patients but may also recruit patients who have gone home after surgery. During weeks 2-3 Post-Surgery, 5 study visits will be completed, each ranging in duration from 1 1/2 - 3 hours. All 5 visits include 2 short TMS sessions (10 total), pain and mood assessments. At V1 and V5, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans will be completed, as well as additional pain and health related assessments (many only done at V1). Also, short, follow-up phone calls will be completed at 3 and 6 months post-surgery to assess pain and other outcomes. |
||||||
Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||||
Study Phase ICMJE | Not Applicable | ||||||
Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor) Masking Description: Patients will be randomized to active TMS vs sham TMS groups with approximately a 2:1 ratio. At the end of the study, the investigators expect 24 patients to have active TMS and 12 patients to have sham TMS sessions. Patients in the sham TMS group will have appointments at the same time as the active TMS patients. The TMS device used for the sham TMS group patients will be identical to the active TMS group. Only the stimulation will be different. |
||||||
Condition ICMJE |
|
||||||
Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||||
Study Arms ICMJE |
|
||||||
Publications * |
|
||||||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||||
Recruitment Information | |||||||
Recruitment Status ICMJE | Withdrawn | ||||||
Actual Enrollment ICMJE |
0 | ||||||
Original Estimated Enrollment ICMJE |
36 | ||||||
Actual Study Completion Date ICMJE | May 19, 2021 | ||||||
Actual Primary Completion Date | May 19, 2021 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||
Eligibility Criteria ICMJE |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||||
Sex/Gender ICMJE |
|
||||||
Ages ICMJE | 18 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult) | ||||||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE | No | ||||||
Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||||
Listed Location Countries ICMJE | United States | ||||||
Removed Location Countries | |||||||
Administrative Information | |||||||
NCT Number ICMJE | NCT03994991 | ||||||
Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | 201906717 | ||||||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product |
|
||||||
IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE |
|
||||||
Responsible Party | Emine Bayman, University of Iowa | ||||||
Study Sponsor ICMJE | Emine Bayman | ||||||
Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||
Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||||
PRS Account | University of Iowa | ||||||
Verification Date | May 2021 | ||||||
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |