免费获得国外相关药品,最快 1 个工作日回馈药物信息

出境医 / 临床实验 / Risk of GAstric Adenocarcinoma After Cephalic Duodenopancreatectomy (RAGAD)

Risk of GAstric Adenocarcinoma After Cephalic Duodenopancreatectomy (RAGAD)

Study Description
Brief Summary:

In view of the similarities of the surgical set-ups of partial gastrectomies and cephalic duodenopancreatectomies, and the increased risk of gastric cancer after early partial gastrectomy, it is possible that the former pancreatic cephalic duodenopancreatectomy pancreaticoduodenectomy (CPD) is also associated with the occurrence of stomach cancer.

The investigators expect a high rate of cancer and high grade dysplasia in these patients based on literature data and available data on gastric cancer after partial gastrectomy. Participants with lesions to be discovered will benefit from earlier medical management of less advanced tumor lesions, with improved prognosis.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the incidence of gastric cancer or high grade dysplasia in patients with old CPP CPD (10 years or older) and who performed the endoscopy protocol.

The cohort will consist of all eligible patients identified from pathology registries and PMSI data from participating centers (patients living 10 years after CPDP, with no previous history of gastric cancer before entering the cohort).

Entry into the cohort (beginning of exposure) will be 10 years after CPD. If a gastric cancer has been diagnosed previously at the beginning of the current study (2019) with histological documentation present in the medical file, no new endoscopy will be performed and the patient will be considered as a "new case" on the date of histological diagnosis of cancer.

Of the patients included in the cohort, some will be eligible to perform the endoscopy added for research. This group will be the sample in which the primary endpoint will be measured.

1. Recruitment of patients with cephalad cephalic duodenopancreatectomy 10 or more years ago 2.

Per patient (in the group with endoscopies):

  • Inclusion consultation with patient consent collection
  • Anesthesia consultation
  • Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and biopsy
  • Follow-up consultation to report the results to the patient and possibly organize a support (announcement device complies with HAS recommendations). For patients in the cohort not included in the endoscopy study, the data collection will be retrospective only (no specific patient consultation for research and no endoscopy review added for this research).

    3. Data analysis: primary endpoints (incidence rate of high grade dysplasia and gastric cancer) and secondary endpoints 700 to 800 patients will be included in the entire cohort and 164 patients in the group with endoscopy.

    7 centers in Ile de France participate.

  • duration of inclusion: 24 months
  • duration of participation (treatment + follow-up): schedule of the visit of anesthesia (5.5 months max), endoscopy programming (1 month max) + the day of the exam + 4 weeks for the results of the exam: 8 months maximum
  • total duration: 32 months

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Cephalic Duodenopancreatectomy 10 or More Years Ago Diagnostic Test: high digestive endoscopy Not Applicable

Show Show detailed description
Study Design
Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 800 participants
Allocation: Non-Randomized
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Intervention Model Description: Of the patients included in the cohort, some will be eligible to perform the endoscopy added for research
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Other
Official Title: Risk of GAstric Adenocarcinoma After Cephalic Duodenopancreatectomy : RAGAD Study
Actual Study Start Date : January 16, 2020
Estimated Primary Completion Date : January 1, 2023
Estimated Study Completion Date : March 31, 2023
Arms and Interventions
Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: with endoscopy
high digestive endoscopy
Diagnostic Test: high digestive endoscopy
high digestive endoscopy with biopsies performed according to the sydney protocol

No Intervention: without endoscopy
no endoscopy
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. the incidence rate of gastric cancer or high grade dysplasia in patients who had CPD 10 or more years ago in the sample of patients who performed the protocol endoscopy [ Time Frame: 7 months after inclusion ]
    the ratio of the number of new cases of gastric cancer or high grade dysplasia (diagnosed at endoscopy with biopsies) divided by the sum of person-times at risk of developing the disease (expressed in person-years).


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Prevalence of gastric cancer or high grade dysplasia in patients who performed the endoscopy [ Time Frame: 7 months after inclusion ]
    the proportion of patients with gastric cancer or high grade dysplasia among patients in the endoscopic study

  2. Low-grade dysplasia incidence rate in patients who performed the endoscopy [ Time Frame: 7 months after inclusion ]
    ratio of the number of new cases of low-grade dysplasia (diagnosed at endoscopy with biopsies) divided by the sum of person-times at risk of developing the disease ( expressed in person-years)

  3. prevalence of low grade dysplasia in patients who performed the endoscopy [ Time Frame: 7 months after inclusion ]
    proportion of patients with low grade dysplasia

  4. Incidence rate of intestinal metaplasia in patients who performed the endoscopy [ Time Frame: 7 months after inclusion ]
    ratio of the number of new cases of intestinal metaplasia (diagnosed at endoscopy with biopsies) divided by the sum of person-times at risk of developing the disease (expressed in terms of years)

  5. prevalence of intestinal metaplasi in patients who performed the endoscopy [ Time Frame: 7 months after inclusion ]
    proportion of patients with intestinal metaplasia.

  6. incidence rate of gastric cancer or high grade dysplasia in cohort of patients [ Time Frame: inclusion ]
    ratio of the number of new cases of low grade dysplasia (histological evidence in the medical file or diagnosed at the endoscopy provided for in the protocol) divided by the sum of person-times at risk of developing the disease (expressed in person-years)

  7. prevalence of gastric cancer or high grade dysplasia in cohort of patients [ Time Frame: inclusion ]
    proportion of patients with gastric cancer or high grade dysplasia

  8. incidence rate of low-grade dysplasia in cohort of patients [ Time Frame: inclusion ]
    the ratio of the number of new cases of low-grade dysplasia (histological evidence in the medical file or diagnosed at the protocol endoscopy) divided by the sum of the time at risk of developing the disease (expressed in person-years)

  9. prevalence of low grade dysplasia in cohort of patients [ Time Frame: inclusion ]
    proportion of patients with intestinal metaplasia

  10. incidence rate of intestinal metaplasia in cohort of patients [ Time Frame: inclusion ]
    ratio of the number of new cases of low grade dysplasia (histological evidence in the medical file or diagnosed at the endoscopy provided for in the protocol) divided by the sum of the person-times at risk of developing the disease (expressed in person-years)

  11. Prevalence of intestinal metaplasia, in cohort of patients [ Time Frame: inclusion ]
    proportion of patients with intestinal metaplasia factors associated with gastric cancer or severe dysplasia. The factors thought to be associated are: family history of gastric cancer, active smoking, presence of Helicobacter pylori, digestive symptoms, pancreaticogastric anastomosis.

  12. Factors associated with low-grade dysplasia or intestinal metaplasia in cohort of patients [ Time Frame: inclusion ]
    occurence of factors thought to be associated, as well as those of gastric cancer or high-grade dysplasia.


Eligibility Criteria
Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria
  1. Inclusion Criteria:

    Criteria for inclusion in the cohort:

    • Patient living 10 years after a CPD performed for a benign or malignant condition in one of the participating centers
    • Age ≥ 18 years at the time of entry into the cohort (10 years after CPD)
    • Non opposition to the use of data

    Inclusion criteria to have endoscopy :

    • Patient living 10 years after a CPP performed for a benign or malignant condition in one of the participating centers Age ≥ 18 years of age for inclusion in the "endoscopy" group
    • Patient with low or medium anesthetic risk (ASA 1, ASA 2, ASA 3)
    • Patient who does not have a genetic or acquired haemostasis disorder preventing the performance of gastric biopsies
    • Possibility of stopping treatment with anticoagulant or clopidogrel or ticagrelor if necessary (see Appendix 1: Management of anticoagulants-antiaggregants in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy requiring gastric biopsies (according to SFED, ESGE recommendation)) (44)
    • Patient affiliated to a social security scheme
    • Informed and signed consent of the patient obtained
  2. No inclusion Criteria:

Criteria for non-inclusion in the cohort:

- Personal history of gastric cancer prior to inclusion in the cohort (before CPD or 10 years after CPD)

Criteria for non-inclusion in endoscopy'group:

  • Personal history of gastric cancer prior to inclusion in the "endoscopy" group (before or after CPD)
  • Pregnant or lactating woman
  • Patient under guardianship
  • Patient with contraindications to local anesthetics and propofol
Contacts and Locations

Contacts
Layout table for location contacts
Contact: Diane Lorenzo 140875328 ext 33 diane.lorenzo@aphp.fr
Contact: philippe levy 140875328 ext 33 philippe.levy@aphp.fr

Locations
Layout table for location information
France
LORENZO Recruiting
Clichy, France
Contact: DIANE LORENZO       diane.lorenzo@aphp.fr   
Sponsors and Collaborators
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Tracking Information
First Submitted Date  ICMJE May 24, 2019
First Posted Date  ICMJE June 19, 2019
Last Update Posted Date June 22, 2020
Actual Study Start Date  ICMJE January 16, 2020
Estimated Primary Completion Date January 1, 2023   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Current Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: June 18, 2019)
the incidence rate of gastric cancer or high grade dysplasia in patients who had CPD 10 or more years ago in the sample of patients who performed the protocol endoscopy [ Time Frame: 7 months after inclusion ]
the ratio of the number of new cases of gastric cancer or high grade dysplasia (diagnosed at endoscopy with biopsies) divided by the sum of person-times at risk of developing the disease (expressed in person-years).
Original Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE Same as current
Change History
Current Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: June 18, 2019)
  • Prevalence of gastric cancer or high grade dysplasia in patients who performed the endoscopy [ Time Frame: 7 months after inclusion ]
    the proportion of patients with gastric cancer or high grade dysplasia among patients in the endoscopic study
  • Low-grade dysplasia incidence rate in patients who performed the endoscopy [ Time Frame: 7 months after inclusion ]
    ratio of the number of new cases of low-grade dysplasia (diagnosed at endoscopy with biopsies) divided by the sum of person-times at risk of developing the disease ( expressed in person-years)
  • prevalence of low grade dysplasia in patients who performed the endoscopy [ Time Frame: 7 months after inclusion ]
    proportion of patients with low grade dysplasia
  • Incidence rate of intestinal metaplasia in patients who performed the endoscopy [ Time Frame: 7 months after inclusion ]
    ratio of the number of new cases of intestinal metaplasia (diagnosed at endoscopy with biopsies) divided by the sum of person-times at risk of developing the disease (expressed in terms of years)
  • prevalence of intestinal metaplasi in patients who performed the endoscopy [ Time Frame: 7 months after inclusion ]
    proportion of patients with intestinal metaplasia.
  • incidence rate of gastric cancer or high grade dysplasia in cohort of patients [ Time Frame: inclusion ]
    ratio of the number of new cases of low grade dysplasia (histological evidence in the medical file or diagnosed at the endoscopy provided for in the protocol) divided by the sum of person-times at risk of developing the disease (expressed in person-years)
  • prevalence of gastric cancer or high grade dysplasia in cohort of patients [ Time Frame: inclusion ]
    proportion of patients with gastric cancer or high grade dysplasia
  • incidence rate of low-grade dysplasia in cohort of patients [ Time Frame: inclusion ]
    the ratio of the number of new cases of low-grade dysplasia (histological evidence in the medical file or diagnosed at the protocol endoscopy) divided by the sum of the time at risk of developing the disease (expressed in person-years)
  • prevalence of low grade dysplasia in cohort of patients [ Time Frame: inclusion ]
    proportion of patients with intestinal metaplasia
  • incidence rate of intestinal metaplasia in cohort of patients [ Time Frame: inclusion ]
    ratio of the number of new cases of low grade dysplasia (histological evidence in the medical file or diagnosed at the endoscopy provided for in the protocol) divided by the sum of the person-times at risk of developing the disease (expressed in person-years)
  • Prevalence of intestinal metaplasia, in cohort of patients [ Time Frame: inclusion ]
    proportion of patients with intestinal metaplasia factors associated with gastric cancer or severe dysplasia. The factors thought to be associated are: family history of gastric cancer, active smoking, presence of Helicobacter pylori, digestive symptoms, pancreaticogastric anastomosis.
  • Factors associated with low-grade dysplasia or intestinal metaplasia in cohort of patients [ Time Frame: inclusion ]
    occurence of factors thought to be associated, as well as those of gastric cancer or high-grade dysplasia.
Original Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE Same as current
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
 
Descriptive Information
Brief Title  ICMJE Risk of GAstric Adenocarcinoma After Cephalic Duodenopancreatectomy
Official Title  ICMJE Risk of GAstric Adenocarcinoma After Cephalic Duodenopancreatectomy : RAGAD Study
Brief Summary

In view of the similarities of the surgical set-ups of partial gastrectomies and cephalic duodenopancreatectomies, and the increased risk of gastric cancer after early partial gastrectomy, it is possible that the former pancreatic cephalic duodenopancreatectomy pancreaticoduodenectomy (CPD) is also associated with the occurrence of stomach cancer.

The investigators expect a high rate of cancer and high grade dysplasia in these patients based on literature data and available data on gastric cancer after partial gastrectomy. Participants with lesions to be discovered will benefit from earlier medical management of less advanced tumor lesions, with improved prognosis.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the incidence of gastric cancer or high grade dysplasia in patients with old CPP CPD (10 years or older) and who performed the endoscopy protocol.

The cohort will consist of all eligible patients identified from pathology registries and PMSI data from participating centers (patients living 10 years after CPDP, with no previous history of gastric cancer before entering the cohort).

Entry into the cohort (beginning of exposure) will be 10 years after CPD. If a gastric cancer has been diagnosed previously at the beginning of the current study (2019) with histological documentation present in the medical file, no new endoscopy will be performed and the patient will be considered as a "new case" on the date of histological diagnosis of cancer.

Of the patients included in the cohort, some will be eligible to perform the endoscopy added for research. This group will be the sample in which the primary endpoint will be measured.

1. Recruitment of patients with cephalad cephalic duodenopancreatectomy 10 or more years ago 2.

Per patient (in the group with endoscopies):

  • Inclusion consultation with patient consent collection
  • Anesthesia consultation
  • Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and biopsy
  • Follow-up consultation to report the results to the patient and possibly organize a support (announcement device complies with HAS recommendations). For patients in the cohort not included in the endoscopy study, the data collection will be retrospective only (no specific patient consultation for research and no endoscopy review added for this research).

    3. Data analysis: primary endpoints (incidence rate of high grade dysplasia and gastric cancer) and secondary endpoints 700 to 800 patients will be included in the entire cohort and 164 patients in the group with endoscopy.

    7 centers in Ile de France participate.

  • duration of inclusion: 24 months
  • duration of participation (treatment + follow-up): schedule of the visit of anesthesia (5.5 months max), endoscopy programming (1 month max) + the day of the exam + 4 weeks for the results of the exam: 8 months maximum
  • total duration: 32 months
Detailed Description

In view of the similarities of the surgical set-ups of partial gastrectomies and cephalic duodenopancreatectomies, and the increased risk of gastric cancer after early partial gastrectomy, it is possible that the former pancreatic cephalic duodenopancreatectomy (CPD) is also associated with the occurrence of stomach cancer.

The investigators expect a high rate of cancer and high grade dysplasia in these patients based on literature data and available data on gastric cancer after partial gastrectomy. Participants with lesions to be discovered will benefit from earlier medical management of less advanced tumor lesions, with improved prognosis.

The investigators results will provide an argument for conducting larger analytical studies and will also provide useful information for the design of these studies. These studies will eventually identify a gastric cancer screening strategy among patients with previous CPDP. Screening programs in groups at higher risk of gastric cancer among patients with CPDP could provide significant benefits in terms of gastric cancer mortality and quality of life, as well as medico-economic positive for the health care system.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the incidence of gastric cancer or high grade dysplasia in patients with old CPDP (10 years or older) and who performed the endoscopy protocol.

The primary endpoint is the incidence rate of gastric cancer or high grade dysplasia in patients who had CPDP 10 years or more ago.

The cohort will consist of all eligible patients identified from pathology registries and PMSI data from participating centers (patients living 10 years after CPDP, with no previous history of gastric cancer before entering the cohort).

Entry into the cohort (beginning of exposure) will be 10 years after CPD. If a gastric cancer has been diagnosed previously at the beginning of the current study (2019) with histological documentation present in the medical file, no new endoscopy will be performed and the patient will be considered as a "new case" on the date of histological diagnosis of cancer. The collection of data will be retrospective for these patients.

Of the patients included in the cohort, some will be eligible to perform the endoscopy added for research. This group will be the sample in which the primary endpoint will be measured.

1. Recruitment of patients with cephalad cephalic duodenopancreatectomy 10 or more years ago 2.

Per patient (in the group with endoscopies):

  • Inclusion consultation with patient consent collection
  • Anesthesia consultation
  • Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and biopsy
  • Follow-up consultation to report the results to the patient and possibly organize a support (announcement device complies with HAS recommendations). For patients in the cohort not included in the endoscopy study, the data collection will be retrospective only (no specific patient consultation for research and no endoscopy review added for this research).

    3. Data analysis: primary endpoints (incidence rate of high grade dysplasia and gastric cancer) and secondary endpoints 700 to 800 patients will be included in the entire cohort and 164 patients in the group with endoscopy.

    7 centers in Ile de France participate.

  • duration of inclusion: 24 months
  • duration of participation (treatment + follow-up): schedule of the visit of anesthesia (5.5 months max), endoscopy programming (1 month max) + the day of the exam + 4 weeks for the results of the exam: 8 months maximum
  • total duration: 32 months
Study Type  ICMJE Interventional
Study Phase  ICMJE Not Applicable
Study Design  ICMJE Allocation: Non-Randomized
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Of the patients included in the cohort, some will be eligible to perform the endoscopy added for research
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Other
Condition  ICMJE Cephalic Duodenopancreatectomy 10 or More Years Ago
Intervention  ICMJE Diagnostic Test: high digestive endoscopy
high digestive endoscopy with biopsies performed according to the sydney protocol
Study Arms  ICMJE
  • Experimental: with endoscopy
    high digestive endoscopy
    Intervention: Diagnostic Test: high digestive endoscopy
  • No Intervention: without endoscopy
    no endoscopy
Publications * Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruitment Information
Recruitment Status  ICMJE Recruiting
Estimated Enrollment  ICMJE
 (submitted: June 18, 2019)
800
Original Estimated Enrollment  ICMJE Same as current
Estimated Study Completion Date  ICMJE March 31, 2023
Estimated Primary Completion Date January 1, 2023   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Eligibility Criteria  ICMJE
  1. Inclusion Criteria:

    Criteria for inclusion in the cohort:

    • Patient living 10 years after a CPD performed for a benign or malignant condition in one of the participating centers
    • Age ≥ 18 years at the time of entry into the cohort (10 years after CPD)
    • Non opposition to the use of data

    Inclusion criteria to have endoscopy :

    • Patient living 10 years after a CPP performed for a benign or malignant condition in one of the participating centers Age ≥ 18 years of age for inclusion in the "endoscopy" group
    • Patient with low or medium anesthetic risk (ASA 1, ASA 2, ASA 3)
    • Patient who does not have a genetic or acquired haemostasis disorder preventing the performance of gastric biopsies
    • Possibility of stopping treatment with anticoagulant or clopidogrel or ticagrelor if necessary (see Appendix 1: Management of anticoagulants-antiaggregants in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy requiring gastric biopsies (according to SFED, ESGE recommendation)) (44)
    • Patient affiliated to a social security scheme
    • Informed and signed consent of the patient obtained
  2. No inclusion Criteria:

Criteria for non-inclusion in the cohort:

- Personal history of gastric cancer prior to inclusion in the cohort (before CPD or 10 years after CPD)

Criteria for non-inclusion in endoscopy'group:

  • Personal history of gastric cancer prior to inclusion in the "endoscopy" group (before or after CPD)
  • Pregnant or lactating woman
  • Patient under guardianship
  • Patient with contraindications to local anesthetics and propofol
Sex/Gender  ICMJE
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
Ages  ICMJE 18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers  ICMJE No
Contacts  ICMJE
Contact: Diane Lorenzo 140875328 ext 33 diane.lorenzo@aphp.fr
Contact: philippe levy 140875328 ext 33 philippe.levy@aphp.fr
Listed Location Countries  ICMJE France
Removed Location Countries  
 
Administrative Information
NCT Number  ICMJE NCT03991065
Other Study ID Numbers  ICMJE P180302J
Has Data Monitoring Committee No
U.S. FDA-regulated Product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
IPD Sharing Statement  ICMJE
Plan to Share IPD: Undecided
Responsible Party Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Study Sponsor  ICMJE Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Collaborators  ICMJE Not Provided
Investigators  ICMJE Not Provided
PRS Account Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Verification Date May 2020

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP