June 12, 2019
|
June 14, 2019
|
March 20, 2020
|
September 2021
|
December 2022 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
|
Incidence of grade 2-4 acute Graft vs Host Disease (GVHD) requiring systemic therapy [ Time Frame: day 100 ]
|
Same as current
|
|
- Incidence of grade 2-4 acute GVHD [ Time Frame: day 100 ]
- Incidence of grade 3-4 acute GVHD [ Time Frame: day 100 ]
- Incidence of grade 2-4 acute GVHD [ Time Frame: month 6 ]
- Incidence of grade 3-4 acute GVHD [ Time Frame: month 6 ]
- Kaplan-Meier analysis of time-to-event: percentage of participants who develop grade 2-4 acute GVHD by visit [ Time Frame: day 0 and 100 days, 6 months ]
- Kaplan-Meier analysis of time-to-event: percentage of participants who develop grade 3-4 acute GVHD by visit [ Time Frame: Day 0 and day 100, month 6 ]
- Incidence of chronic GVHD [ Time Frame: month 6 ]
- Incidence of chronic GVHD [ Time Frame: month 12 ]
- Kaplan-Meier analysis of time-to-event: percentage of participants who develop chronic GVHD [ Time Frame: Day 0 and month 6, 12 ]
Time to event distributions estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method
- Incidence of GVHD-free survival [ Time Frame: month 6 ]
GVHD-free survival is defined as freedom from GVHD requiring systemic steroids
- Incidence of GVHD-free survival [ Time Frame: month 12 ]
GVHD-free survival is defined as freedom from GVHD requiring systemic steroids
- Incidence of relapse-free survival [ Time Frame: month 6 ]
Relapse-free survival is defined as freedom from relapse
- Incidence of relapse-free survival [ Time Frame: month 12 ]
Relapse-free survival is defined as freedom from relapse
- Incidence of bacterial infections [ Time Frame: Day 100 ]
- Incidence of fungal infections [ Time Frame: Day 100 ]
- Incidence of viral infections [ Time Frame: Day 100 ]
- Incidence of overall infections [ Time Frame: Day 100 ]
- Incidence of bacterial infections [ Time Frame: 6 months ]
- Incidence of fungal infections [ Time Frame: month 6 ]
- Incidence of viral infections [ Time Frame: month 6 ]
- Incidence of overall infections [ Time Frame: month 6 ]
- Incidence of bacterial infections [ Time Frame: month 12 ]
- Incidence of fungal infections [ Time Frame: month 12 ]
- Incidence of viral infections [ Time Frame: month 12 ]
- Incidence of overall infections [ Time Frame: month 12 ]
- Kaplan-Meier analysis of time-to-event: percentage of participants who develop bacterial infections [ Time Frame: Day 0 and day 100, month 6,12 ]
- Kaplan-Meier analysis of time-to-event: percentage of participants who develop fungal infections [ Time Frame: Day 0 and day 100, month 6,12 ]
- Kaplan-Meier analysis of time-to-event: percentage of participants who develop viral infections [ Time Frame: Day 0 and day 100, month 6,12 ]
- Kaplan-Meier analysis of time-to-event: percentage of participants who develop overall infections [ Time Frame: Day 0 and day 100, month 6,12 ]
- Incidence of relapse [ Time Frame: month 6 ]
- Incidence of relapse [ Time Frame: month 12 ]
- Kaplan-Meier analysis of time-to-event: percentage of participants who relapse [ Time Frame: Day 0 and month 6,12 ]
- Incidence of non-relapse mortality [ Time Frame: month 6 ]
Non-relapse mortality is defined as death while in remission from the primary disease
- Incidence of non-relapse mortality [ Time Frame: month 12 ]
Non-relapse mortality is defined as death while in remission from the primary disease
- Kaplan-Meier analysis of time-to-event: percentage of participants who experience non-relapse mortality [ Time Frame: Day 0 and month 6,12 ]
Non-relapse mortality is defined as death while in remission from the primary disease
- Incidence of hospital re-admission [ Time Frame: Day 100 ]
- Incidence of hospital re-admission [ Time Frame: month 6 ]
- Incidence of hospital re-admission [ Time Frame: month 12 ]
- Kaplan-Meier analysis of time-to-event: percentage of participants who are re-admitted to the hospital [ Time Frame: Day 0 and day 100, month 6,12 ]
- Length of hospital re-admission [ Time Frame: Day 100 ]
- Length of hospital re-admission [ Time Frame: month 6 ]
- Length of hospital re-admission [ Time Frame: month 12 ]
- Incidence of intensive care unit (ICU) admission [ Time Frame: Day 100 ]
- Incidence of intensive care unit (ICU) admission [ Time Frame: month 6 ]
- Incidence of intensive care unit (ICU) admission [ Time Frame: month 12 ]
- Kaplan-Meier analysis of time-to-event: percentage of participants who are admitted to ICU [ Time Frame: Day 0 and month 6,12 ]
- Length of intensive care unit (ICU) admission [ Time Frame: Day 100 ]
- Length of intensive care unit (ICU) admission [ Time Frame: month 6 ]
- Length of intensive care unit (ICU) admission [ Time Frame: month 12 ]
- Length of stay in days between transplant and discharge to home [ Time Frame: Day 0 until discharge from hospital, up to 100 days ]
To determine the length of stay between transplant (Day 0) and discharge to home for those alive to be discharged home
- Quality of life as measured by the FACT-BMT assessment [ Time Frame: day 30 ]
- Quality of life as measured by the FACT-BMT assessment [ Time Frame: day 100 ]
- Quality of life as measured by the EQ 5D-5L assessment [ Time Frame: Day 30 ]
- Quality of life as measured by the EQ 5D-5L assessment [ Time Frame: Day 100 ]
- Quality of life as measured by the Lorig Self-Efficacy assessment [ Time Frame: Day 30 ]
- Quality of life as measured by the Lorig Self-Efficacy assessment [ Time Frame: Day 100 ]
- Quality of life as measured by the PG-SGA (patient-generated subjective global assessment) [ Time Frame: day 30 ]
- Quality of life as measured by the PG-SGA (patient-generated subjective global assessment) [ Time Frame: day 100 ]
- Quality of life as measured by the PROMIS-Depression assessment [ Time Frame: day 30 ]
- Quality of life as measured by the PROMIS-Depression assessment [ Time Frame: day 100 ]
- Quality of life as measured by the PROMIS-Anxiety assessment [ Time Frame: Day 30 ]
- Quality of life as measured by the PROMIS-Anxiety assessment [ Time Frame: Day 100 ]
- Quality of life as measured by the PROMIS-Social Isolation assessment [ Time Frame: Day 30 ]
- Quality of life as measured by the PROMIS-Social Isolation assessment [ Time Frame: Day 100 ]
- Quality of life as measured by the PROMIS-Emotional Support assessment [ Time Frame: day 30 ]
- Quality of life as measured by the PROMIS-Emotional Support assessment [ Time Frame: Day 100 ]
- Quality of life as measured by the PROMIS-Cognitive Function assessment [ Time Frame: Day 30 ]
- Quality of life as measured by the PROMIS-Cognitive Function assessment [ Time Frame: Day 100 ]
- Quality of life as measured by the PROMIS-Physical Function assessment [ Time Frame: Day 30 ]
- Quality of life as measured by the PROMIS-Physical Function assessment [ Time Frame: Day 100 ]
- Rate of grade 2 or higher adverse events, causally related during treatment period [ Time Frame: Day 75 ]
- Rate of grade 2 or higher adverse events, causally related during follow up period [ Time Frame: Year 1 ]
- Rate of grade 2 or higher adverse events, non related during treatment period [ Time Frame: Day 75 ]
- Rate of grade 2 or higher adverse events, non related during follow up period [ Time Frame: Year 1 ]
|
Same as current
|
Not Provided
|
Not Provided
|
|
MPH966 for Prevention of Graft-versus-host Disease After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
|
A Phase 1/2 Study of MPH966, an Oral Neutrophil Elastase Inhibitor, for Prevention of Graft-versus-host Disease After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
|
The purpose of this study is evaluate the safety and tolerability of MPH966, a neutrophil elastase inhibitor, and its ability to prevent graft-versus-host disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplant.
|
Phase 1 is a 3+3 dose escalation study to determine the safety and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of MPH966 in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). We will evaluate up to 4 doses: 60 mg po bid, 120 mg po bid, 180 mg po bid, and 240 mg po bid. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy will be assessed in real time and pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics after each dose cohort before escalating to the next cohort.
Phase 2 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to determine the clinical efficacy of MPH966 vs. placebo in preventing acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after HCT, using the RP2D as determined by the phase 1 trial.
|
Interventional
|
Phase 1 Phase 2
|
Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double (Participant, Care Provider) Primary Purpose: Treatment
|
Hematologic Malignancy
|
- Drug: MPH966
RP2D tablet
Other Name: alvelestat
- Drug: Placebo
MPH966 placebo table
|
- Experimental: MPH966
Participants receive MPH966 at RP2D tablet orally twice daily from the start of conditioning chemotherapy through 45 days post transplant.
Intervention: Drug: MPH966
- Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants receive MPH placebo tablet matching MPH966 orally twice daily from the start of conditioning chemotherapy through 45 days post transplant.
Intervention: Drug: Placebo
|
Not Provided
|
|
Withdrawn
|
0
|
72
|
December 2023
|
December 2022 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
|
Inclusion Criteria:
- Provision of written informed consent prior to any study specific procedures
- Plan to undergo allogeneic HCT for any cancer or non-cancer illness with a planned cell dose of ≥2 x 106 CD34/kg using peripheral blood stem cells.
- Plan to receive a myeloablative conditioning regimen (see 4.3.1).
- Plan to receive GVHD prophylaxis with tacrolimus and methotrexate.
- Having a donor who is a 10 of 10 HLA match;
- Karnofsky Performance Scale KPS ≥60
- Willing to abstain from sexual activity or use two methods of birth control while on study drug and for 5 half-lives (4 days) after last dose.
Exclusion Criteria:
- If female, pregnant or nursing.
- Life expectancy <6 months
- Other malignancy or neoplastic disease (i.e. aside from the malignancy for which they are undergoing HCT) within the past 5 years with the exception of treated basal/squamous cell skin carcinoma or treated cervical cancer in situ
- Clinically significant active infection within 1 week of starting study drug
-
Any of the following organ system function criteria:
- Cardiac: Ejection fraction ≤40% or myocardial infarction within 6 months of transplant or QTc >450 msec for males and >470 msec for females or other EKG abnormality which in the opinion of the investigator may put the subject at risk or interfere with study assessments
- Renal: Creatinine clearance (CLcr) ≤ 60 mL/min as estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault equation
- Pulmonary: FEV1, FVC, or corrected DLCO ≤40% predicted (forced expiratory volume in 1 second; forced vital capacity; and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, respectively)
- Hepatic: Total bilirubin >1.5 x (in the absence of known inherited hyperbilirubinemia, e.g. Gilbert's) and/or aspartate transaminase (AST)/alanine transaminase (ALT) >3 x upper limit of institutional normal for age (grade 2 or higher) and/or INR >1.5 (unless on anticoagulant), or history or evidence of cirrhosis (e.g. esophageal varices, ascites, or hepatic encephalopathy) or other chronic liver disease (e.g. Wilson's disease, autoimmune liver disease, primary biliary cirrhosis, etc.). Abnormalities in platelet number or albumin will not be considered exclusion criteria given that these are often due to the hematologic malignancy for which the patient is undergoing HCT rather than actual liver dysfunction
- Uncontrolled infection, including detection of hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) by serology or nucleic acid testing or HIV by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
i. Treated HBV/HCV/HIV with documented clearance is ok f. Other significant organ dysfunction (cardiac, pulmonary, renal, metabolic or central nervous system) that is uncontrolled and may interfere with study completion
- Any significant medial history of alcohol abuse within 3 months of starting study drug and/or unwillingness to abstain for the duration of the study and follow up periods
- Prior (within 30 days) or concomitant use of another neutrophil elastase inhibitor (e.g. alpha-1 antitrypsin)
- Plan for in vivo or ex vivo T cell depletion.
-
Participated in another clinical study involving an investigational drug or device within 30 days or 5 half-lives prior to planned start of MPH966/placebo, or scheduled to participate in another clinical study involving an investigational drug or device within Day 100 of transplant
- If the patient develops GVHD within the first 100 days, they are allowed to enroll on trials of investigational drugs to treat GVHD provided they come off of this study.
- Enrollment in biorepository or supportive care trials that do not involve investigational drugs or devices is allowed
- Any clinically relevant abnormal findings in physical examination, vital signs, hematology, clinical chemistry, or urinalysis at visit, which in the opinion of the Investigator, may put the subject at risk because of his/her participation in the study, or may influence the results of the study, or the subject's ability to participate in the study
- Low or intermediate risk acute leukemia in first complete remission, chronic myeloid leukemia in first chronic phase, and any benign (non-malignant) disorders (phase 1 dose-escalation portion only)
|
Sexes Eligible for Study: |
All |
|
18 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
|
No
|
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
|
United States
|
|
|
NCT03986086
|
Pro00102362
|
Yes
|
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: |
Yes |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: |
No |
|
|
Nelson Chao, Duke University
|
Nelson Chao
|
- Mereo BioPharma
- National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS)
|
Principal Investigator: |
Anthony Sung, MD |
Duke University Health System (DUHS) |
|
Duke University
|
March 2020
|