免费获得国外相关药品,最快 1 个工作日回馈药物信息

出境医 / 临床实验 / Does a Central Venous Line Reduce Perioperative Fluid Administration?

Does a Central Venous Line Reduce Perioperative Fluid Administration?

Study Description
Brief Summary:
'Hypothesis-generating' study to assess whether the presence of a central venous line significantly affects the volumes of fluid infused perioperatively in major elective colorectal surgery

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment
Colorectal Disorders Device: Central Venous Catheter

Show Show detailed description
Study Design
Layout table for study information
Study Type : Observational
Actual Enrollment : 40 participants
Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Prospective
Official Title: In High Risk Patients Undergoing Elective Colorectal Resection, Does Routine Placement of a Central Venous Catheter Reduce Peri-operative Fluid Administration in Theatre and the Critical Care Unit?
Actual Study Start Date : May 1, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date : May 19, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date : May 19, 2020
Arms and Interventions
Group/Cohort Intervention/treatment
No CVC inserted
Patients undergoing major elective colorectal resection without central venous catheter inserted pre-operatively
CVC inserted
Patients undergoing major elective colorectal resection with a central venous catheter inserted pre-operatively
Device: Central Venous Catheter
Insertion of a central venous catheter insertion pre-operatively (electively)

Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Volume of intravenous fluid infused intra-operatively [ Time Frame: Intra-operatively (from induction to leaving theatre) ]
    To assess whether the presence of a central venous catheter influences the volume of intravenous fluid infused intra-operatively

  2. Volume of intravenous fluid infused post-operatively [ Time Frame: The first 12 hours post-operatively (commencing from the arrival on the critical care unit, until the end of the 12th post-operative hour) ]
    To assess whether the presence of a central venous catheter influences the volume of intravenous fluid infused post-operatively


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Length of Intensive Care Unit Stay [ Time Frame: From admission to intensive care, until stepdown to the ward (and until the expected end of study on 30th April 2020) ]
    Does the presence of a central venous catheter alter length of post-operative stay on the Intensive Care Unit

  2. Volume of blood product infused peri-operatively [ Time Frame: From induction of anaesthesia until the end of the 12th post-operative hour ]
    To assess whether the presence of a central venous catheter influences the volume of blood products infused peri-operatively

  3. Mean dose of required vasopressor agents [ Time Frame: From induction of anaesthesia until the end of the 12th post-operative hour ]
    To assess whether the presence of a central venous catheter influences the mean dose of any required vasopressor agents peri-operatively

  4. Use of cardiac output (flow-monitoring) equipment [ Time Frame: From induction of anaesthesia until the end of the 12th post-operative hour ]
    To assess whether the presence of a central venous catheter, and any ensuing fluid and blood pressure management strategies, influence the use of cardiac output monitoring equipment peri-operatively

  5. Length of hospital stay [ Time Frame: From the day of the procedure until discharge from the hospital (and until the expected end of study on 30th April 2020) ]
    To assess whether the presence of a central venous catheter influences the total post-operative length of stay


Eligibility Criteria
Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Sampling Method:   Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Adult patients, undergoing elective major colorectal resection, at a district general hospital in east London, UK.
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

The inclusion criteria will be all adult patients presenting for elective major colorectal surgery (resection), whom are to be electively admitted to critical care directly from theatre.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under 18 years of age
  • Patients undergoing emergency surgery
  • Those not admitted electively to critical care directly from theatre
  • Those patients that do not undergo any bowel resection
  • Patients in whom central venous catheter insertion is as an emergency peri- operatively
  • Patients refusing/unable to give valid informed consent
Contacts and Locations

Locations
Layout table for location information
United Kingdom
Whipps Cross Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust
London, United Kingdom, E11 1NR
Sponsors and Collaborators
Barts & The London NHS Trust
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Study Director: David Melia, MBBS Barts & The London NHS Trust
Tracking Information
First Submitted Date June 7, 2019
First Posted Date June 13, 2019
Last Update Posted Date May 29, 2020
Actual Study Start Date May 1, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date May 19, 2020   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Current Primary Outcome Measures
 (submitted: June 12, 2019)
  • Volume of intravenous fluid infused intra-operatively [ Time Frame: Intra-operatively (from induction to leaving theatre) ]
    To assess whether the presence of a central venous catheter influences the volume of intravenous fluid infused intra-operatively
  • Volume of intravenous fluid infused post-operatively [ Time Frame: The first 12 hours post-operatively (commencing from the arrival on the critical care unit, until the end of the 12th post-operative hour) ]
    To assess whether the presence of a central venous catheter influences the volume of intravenous fluid infused post-operatively
Original Primary Outcome Measures Same as current
Change History
Current Secondary Outcome Measures
 (submitted: June 12, 2019)
  • Length of Intensive Care Unit Stay [ Time Frame: From admission to intensive care, until stepdown to the ward (and until the expected end of study on 30th April 2020) ]
    Does the presence of a central venous catheter alter length of post-operative stay on the Intensive Care Unit
  • Volume of blood product infused peri-operatively [ Time Frame: From induction of anaesthesia until the end of the 12th post-operative hour ]
    To assess whether the presence of a central venous catheter influences the volume of blood products infused peri-operatively
  • Mean dose of required vasopressor agents [ Time Frame: From induction of anaesthesia until the end of the 12th post-operative hour ]
    To assess whether the presence of a central venous catheter influences the mean dose of any required vasopressor agents peri-operatively
  • Use of cardiac output (flow-monitoring) equipment [ Time Frame: From induction of anaesthesia until the end of the 12th post-operative hour ]
    To assess whether the presence of a central venous catheter, and any ensuing fluid and blood pressure management strategies, influence the use of cardiac output monitoring equipment peri-operatively
  • Length of hospital stay [ Time Frame: From the day of the procedure until discharge from the hospital (and until the expected end of study on 30th April 2020) ]
    To assess whether the presence of a central venous catheter influences the total post-operative length of stay
Original Secondary Outcome Measures Same as current
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
 
Descriptive Information
Brief Title Does a Central Venous Line Reduce Perioperative Fluid Administration?
Official Title In High Risk Patients Undergoing Elective Colorectal Resection, Does Routine Placement of a Central Venous Catheter Reduce Peri-operative Fluid Administration in Theatre and the Critical Care Unit?
Brief Summary 'Hypothesis-generating' study to assess whether the presence of a central venous line significantly affects the volumes of fluid infused perioperatively in major elective colorectal surgery
Detailed Description

There are several indications for elective central venous cannulation in major colorectal surgery, particularly in those at a higher risk of morbidity and mortality. These include: the ability to infuse certain vasoactive medications, monitor central venous pressure, allow for frequent blood sampling, and provide a route of access for total parenteral nutrition(1). Furthermore, there has been a great deal of recent interest in whether there are improved outcomes with restrictive as opposed to liberal fluid therapy in major abdominal surgery(2), and, similarly, with individualised, rather than generic, blood pressure management in major surgery(3). However, there have been no major studies to date examining whether the simple act of electively inserting a central venous catheter prior to the start of surgery influences the volume of fluid infused and the use of vasopressors perioperatively.

The RELIEF trial reported that modestly liberal perioperative fluid regimens conferred no greater disability-free survival benefit over restrictive regimens, but are likely to reduce rates of acute kidney injury(2). This contrasts with the restrictive protocols championed by various Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs(4). Previous works have suggested that not only does adherence to ERAS principles lead to superior patient outcomes, but some have gone further in identifying restriction of intravenous fluids perioperatively to be one of the few interventions that independently predicts a better outcome(5). One of the advantages of central venous catheterisation is the ability to administer drugs in smaller volumes of fluid. Therefore, given the intensity of the debate surrounding restrictive and liberal regimens, it should be investigated whether the availability of central venous access impacts upon the volumes of fluid infused.

Furthermore, central venous catheterisation is unlikely just to have an impact via the avoidance of inadvertent larger volume infusion, which is sometimes seen with drug administration through a peripheral line. The RELIEF trial reported that the patient cohort managed with a restrictive fluid regimen were more likely to receive vasopressor support, compared with those receiving a liberal regimen(2). The presence of a central venous catheter enables the use of potent vasopressor agents, such as noradrenaline, which will further influence fluid administration, by introducing a second therapeutic option for correcting perioperative hypotension. The importance of 'tight' blood pressure control has been demonstrated by the INPRESS trial, which showed a reduction in post-operative organ dysfunction with individualised blood pressure management, over standard management strategies(3). This is of particular importance, as evidence has shown that cardiac output-directed fluid therapy should not lead to 'excessive fluid administration, but may lead to a more individualised approach to achieving the correct dose of fluid'(6), and may require concomitant use of vasoactive agents.

Thus, the investigators have set out to investigate whether the elective insertion of a central venous catheter prior to the start of major colorectal surgery, influences the volumes, and types, of fluid infused, as well as the use and mean dose of vasopressor agents, intra-operatively and for the first 12 hours post-operatively.

  1. Smith, RN, et al., 'Central venous catheters', BMJ 2013; 347:f6570
  2. Myles, PS, et al., 'Restrictive versus Liberal Fluid Therapy for Major Abdominal Surgery', N Engl J Med 2018; 378:24
  3. Futier, E, et al., 'Effect of Individualised vs Standard Blood Pressure Management Strategies on Postoperative Organ Dysfunction Among High-Risk Patients Undergoing Major Surgery', JAMA 2017; 318(14):1346
  4. Feldheiser, A, et al., 'Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 2: consensus statement for anaesthesia practice', Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavia 2016, 60:289
  5. Gustafsson, UO, et al., 'Adherence to the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol and Outcomes After Colorectal Cancer Surgery', Arch Surg 2011; 146(5):571
  6. Pearse, RM, et al., 'Effect of a Perioperative Cardiac Output- Guided Haemodynamic Therapy Algorithm on Outcomes Following Major Gastrointestinal Surgery', JAMA 2014; 311(21):2181
Study Type Observational
Study Design Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Prospective
Target Follow-Up Duration Not Provided
Biospecimen Not Provided
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Study Population Adult patients, undergoing elective major colorectal resection, at a district general hospital in east London, UK.
Condition Colorectal Disorders
Intervention Device: Central Venous Catheter
Insertion of a central venous catheter insertion pre-operatively (electively)
Study Groups/Cohorts
  • No CVC inserted
    Patients undergoing major elective colorectal resection without central venous catheter inserted pre-operatively
  • CVC inserted
    Patients undergoing major elective colorectal resection with a central venous catheter inserted pre-operatively
    Intervention: Device: Central Venous Catheter
Publications * Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruitment Information
Recruitment Status Completed
Actual Enrollment
 (submitted: May 28, 2020)
40
Original Estimated Enrollment
 (submitted: June 12, 2019)
60
Actual Study Completion Date May 19, 2020
Actual Primary Completion Date May 19, 2020   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

The inclusion criteria will be all adult patients presenting for elective major colorectal surgery (resection), whom are to be electively admitted to critical care directly from theatre.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under 18 years of age
  • Patients undergoing emergency surgery
  • Those not admitted electively to critical care directly from theatre
  • Those patients that do not undergo any bowel resection
  • Patients in whom central venous catheter insertion is as an emergency peri- operatively
  • Patients refusing/unable to give valid informed consent
Sex/Gender
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
Ages 18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers No
Contacts Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Listed Location Countries United Kingdom
Removed Location Countries  
 
Administrative Information
NCT Number NCT03985111
Other Study ID Numbers 012593
19/LO/0099 ( Other Identifier: HREC )
252375 ( Other Identifier: IRAS )
Has Data Monitoring Committee No
U.S. FDA-regulated Product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD: No
Plan Description: At this stage there is no plan to make IPD available, and certainly no such intention has been discussed with the relevant ethical and review boards (HREC/HRA).
Responsible Party Barts & The London NHS Trust
Study Sponsor Barts & The London NHS Trust
Collaborators Not Provided
Investigators
Study Director: David Melia, MBBS Barts & The London NHS Trust
PRS Account Barts & The London NHS Trust
Verification Date June 2019

治疗医院