Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Respiratory Failure Mechanical Ventilation | Drug: Lidocaine | Not Applicable |
The use of protective mechanical ventilation has improved prognosis on patients with Acute Respiratory Failure. The association of neuromuscular blockade in the first 48-72h has additionally contributed to a higher survival rate. Such improvement may be due to the reduction of transpulmonary pressures caused by the patient's inspiratory effort. To achieve appropriate neuromuscular blockade, highes doses of both neuromuscular blocking agents and sedatives are required. Therefore, such a strategy usually causes muscular atrophy, including the diaphragm.
Because of the augmented neural drive of such patients, exacerbated by inflammation and pulmonary edema, the consequent high tidal volume and transpulmonary pressure cannot be reduced by the newest sedatives. In fact, some of these sedatives may even deteriorate ventilatory dyssynchrony. Our intention is to verify a novel approach: whether is possible to reduce the inspiratory effort of patients without the use of systemic neuromuscular blocking agents.
Our objective in this proof of concept study is to determine the feasibility the use of phrenic nerve blockade to decrease transpulmonary pressure and tidal volume, as well as quantify its effects on esophageal pressure, diaphragmatic electrical activity, transpulmonary pressure and ventilation distribution in patients on spontaneous breathing. It is expected that such intervention will reduce diaphragm electrical activity, leading to lower transpulmonary pressure, tidal volume and driving pressures.
All patients will be submitted to the same intervention. Respiratory mechanics, ventilation distribution, diaphragm electrical activity, heart rate, mean arterial pressure and peripheral saturation will be collected throughout the study. Once the patient presents the same diaphragmatic electrical activity and transpulmonary pressure as before the phrenic nerve block, the study will be over.
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Actual Enrollment : | 10 participants |
Allocation: | N/A |
Intervention Model: | Single Group Assignment |
Intervention Model Description: | All patients will be submitted to the same procedures. There will be no between-group comparisons. |
Masking: | None (Open Label) |
Primary Purpose: | Supportive Care |
Official Title: | Feasibility of Phrenic Nerve Block to Mitigate Self-inflicted Lung Injury in ARF Patients Under Mechanical Ventilation on Spontaneous Breathing |
Actual Study Start Date : | May 15, 2019 |
Actual Primary Completion Date : | December 31, 2019 |
Actual Study Completion Date : | September 9, 2020 |
Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Phrenic Nerve Blockade
All patients will be submitted to bilateral phrenic nerve block on its cervical portion.
|
Drug: Lidocaine
Using an ultrasound and a nerve stimulator, the phrenic nerve will be identified and low-dose lidocaine will be administered perineurally.
Other Name: Local anesthetic
|
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Brazil | |
Hospital das Clínicas - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo | |
São Paulo, Brazil, 01246-903 |
Principal Investigator: | Joaquim E Vieira, MD, PhD | University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine | |
Principal Investigator: | Marcelo BP Amato, MD, PhD | University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine |
Tracking Information | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date ICMJE | May 10, 2019 | ||||||
First Posted Date ICMJE | June 7, 2019 | ||||||
Last Update Posted Date | September 30, 2020 | ||||||
Actual Study Start Date ICMJE | May 15, 2019 | ||||||
Actual Primary Completion Date | December 31, 2019 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||
Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Reduction of tidal volume or transpulmonary pressure [ Time Frame: 20 minutes ] Tidal volume or transpulmonary pressure measured using EIT, Servo-I and an esophageal balloon
|
||||||
Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||
Change History | |||||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||||
Descriptive Information | |||||||
Brief Title ICMJE | Phrenic Nerve Block to Mitigate Self-inflicted Lung Injury | ||||||
Official Title ICMJE | Feasibility of Phrenic Nerve Block to Mitigate Self-inflicted Lung Injury in ARF Patients Under Mechanical Ventilation on Spontaneous Breathing | ||||||
Brief Summary | The purpose of this single-centered, proof of concept study is to determine whether it is feasible to perform a phrenic nerve block to reduce diaphragm electrical activity and, therefore, inspiratory effort and if such block reduces self-inflicted lung injury on patients under mechanical ventilation on spontaneous breathing. Ten patients will be monitored with electrical impedance tomography, NAVA catheter, and esophageal balloon. Using a nerve stimulator and an ultrasound, we will identify the phrenic nerve on its cervical portion bilaterally and administer perineural low-dose lidocaine. Diaphragm electrical activity, transpulmonary pressure and data on ventilation distribution will be continuously collected. The study will be over once the patient presents the same diaphragm electrical activity and transpulmonary pressure as before the phrenic nerve block. | ||||||
Detailed Description |
The use of protective mechanical ventilation has improved prognosis on patients with Acute Respiratory Failure. The association of neuromuscular blockade in the first 48-72h has additionally contributed to a higher survival rate. Such improvement may be due to the reduction of transpulmonary pressures caused by the patient's inspiratory effort. To achieve appropriate neuromuscular blockade, highes doses of both neuromuscular blocking agents and sedatives are required. Therefore, such a strategy usually causes muscular atrophy, including the diaphragm. Because of the augmented neural drive of such patients, exacerbated by inflammation and pulmonary edema, the consequent high tidal volume and transpulmonary pressure cannot be reduced by the newest sedatives. In fact, some of these sedatives may even deteriorate ventilatory dyssynchrony. Our intention is to verify a novel approach: whether is possible to reduce the inspiratory effort of patients without the use of systemic neuromuscular blocking agents. Our objective in this proof of concept study is to determine the feasibility the use of phrenic nerve blockade to decrease transpulmonary pressure and tidal volume, as well as quantify its effects on esophageal pressure, diaphragmatic electrical activity, transpulmonary pressure and ventilation distribution in patients on spontaneous breathing. It is expected that such intervention will reduce diaphragm electrical activity, leading to lower transpulmonary pressure, tidal volume and driving pressures. All patients will be submitted to the same intervention. Respiratory mechanics, ventilation distribution, diaphragm electrical activity, heart rate, mean arterial pressure and peripheral saturation will be collected throughout the study. Once the patient presents the same diaphragmatic electrical activity and transpulmonary pressure as before the phrenic nerve block, the study will be over. |
||||||
Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||||
Study Phase ICMJE | Not Applicable | ||||||
Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: N/A Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Intervention Model Description: All patients will be submitted to the same procedures. There will be no between-group comparisons. Masking: None (Open Label)Primary Purpose: Supportive Care |
||||||
Condition ICMJE |
|
||||||
Intervention ICMJE | Drug: Lidocaine
Using an ultrasound and a nerve stimulator, the phrenic nerve will be identified and low-dose lidocaine will be administered perineurally.
Other Name: Local anesthetic
|
||||||
Study Arms ICMJE | Experimental: Phrenic Nerve Blockade
All patients will be submitted to bilateral phrenic nerve block on its cervical portion.
Intervention: Drug: Lidocaine
|
||||||
Publications * | Not Provided | ||||||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||||
Recruitment Information | |||||||
Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed | ||||||
Actual Enrollment ICMJE |
10 | ||||||
Original Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||
Actual Study Completion Date ICMJE | September 9, 2020 | ||||||
Actual Primary Completion Date | December 31, 2019 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||
Eligibility Criteria ICMJE |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||||
Sex/Gender ICMJE |
|
||||||
Ages ICMJE | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) | ||||||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE | No | ||||||
Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||||
Listed Location Countries ICMJE | Brazil | ||||||
Removed Location Countries | |||||||
Administrative Information | |||||||
NCT Number ICMJE | NCT03978845 | ||||||
Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | CAAE 02029118.2.0000.00.68 | ||||||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product |
|
||||||
IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE |
|
||||||
Responsible Party | University of Sao Paulo General Hospital | ||||||
Study Sponsor ICMJE | University of Sao Paulo General Hospital | ||||||
Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||
Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||||
PRS Account | University of Sao Paulo General Hospital | ||||||
Verification Date | May 2019 | ||||||
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |