Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms | Procedure: Radical Cystectomy | Not Applicable |
Radical cystectomy (RC) is a comprehensive surgery including pelvic lymph node dissection and urinary diversion. The surgery is originally performed as an open procedure (ORC) but with advances in technology the procedure is now also offered as a robot-assisted laparoscopic procedure (RARC). It remains questionable if RARC is superior to ORC in terms of surgical outcomes.
Several studies have described outcomes following RARC of which most are comparative studies with only five studies being randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Overall, significant differences in operating room time, estimated blood loss, time to flatus and bowel movement as well as use of morphine sulfate equivalents in favor of RARC has been demonstrated with the exception of operating room time. However, no studies have demonstrated a significant reduction in risk of 30- or 90-day complication rates between ORC and RARC. The RCTs have not been blinded, and therefore may be subject to bias in terms of expectations from patients and care providers. Also, in the already conducted RCTs of ORC versus RARC the urinary diversion has been done extracorporally. Today, it is possible to conduct the whole procedure of RARC intracorporally (iRARC), potentially reducing the surgical stress further. Lastly, the previously conducted RCTs have not consequently been managed under an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) setup. Currently, a multicenter study comparing ORC with RARC is recruiting in the United Kingdom in which the patients are treated with iRARC and under an ERAS setup. The present study will compare the two methods blinded for the participants and all health care providers involved in the postoperative care from the time the patient exits the operating room (OR). Blinded studies in surgery are rare but in gastrointestinal surgery, a blinded study of open versus laparoscopic colonic resection has demonstrated to be feasible and thus we believe that such study must be feasible in an RC setting.
Participants will be randomized 1:1 to either ORC or RARC. Blinding: The study is blinded for the patient and for the group of nurses and doctors that will be responsible for the postoperative care. The postoperative care will be managed by members of the bladder cancer team other than the operating surgeon, and OR staff will not be involved in the postoperative care. The abdominal wound will be bandaged to hide the wounds from both an open and laparoscopic procedure. The blinding will be maintained until discharge from hospital.
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Actual Enrollment : | 50 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | Double (Participant, Care Provider) |
Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
Official Title: | A Controlled Blinded Randomized Feasibility Study of Open Radical Cystectomy (ORC) Versus Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy With Intracorporal Urinary Diversion (iRARC) Under an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Setup |
Actual Study Start Date : | June 6, 2019 |
Actual Primary Completion Date : | November 1, 2020 |
Actual Study Completion Date : | January 20, 2021 |
Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Open Radical Cystectomy (ORC)
Open radical cystectomy includes in both genders removal of the bladder and distal ureters as well as pelvic lymphadenectomy. In men the procedure includes removal of the prostate and seminal vesicles and in women removal of the uterus, ovaries, urethra and part of the vagina. Lastly, for both genders an iliac conduit urinary diversion is performed.
|
Procedure: Radical Cystectomy
Participants are randomly and blinded assigned
|
Active Comparator: Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy (iRARC)
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy includes in both genders removal of the bladder and distal ureters as well as pelvic lymphadenectomy. In men the procedure includes removal of the prostate and seminal vesicles and in women removal of the uterus, ovaries, urethra and part of the vagina. Lastly, for both genders an intracorporeal iliac conduit urinary diversion is performed.
|
Procedure: Radical Cystectomy
Participants are randomly and blinded assigned
|
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Denmark | |
Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet | |
Copenhagen, Denmark |
Tracking Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date ICMJE | May 29, 2019 | ||||
First Posted Date ICMJE | June 6, 2019 | ||||
Last Update Posted Date | January 26, 2021 | ||||
Actual Study Start Date ICMJE | June 6, 2019 | ||||
Actual Primary Completion Date | November 1, 2020 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Participants blinded at discharge [ Time Frame: 12 months ] Number of patients that was not unblinded at discharge
|
||||
Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
Change History | |||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||
Descriptive Information | |||||
Brief Title ICMJE | Study Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy With Robot-assisted Cystectomy in Patients With Bladder Cancer | ||||
Official Title ICMJE | A Controlled Blinded Randomized Feasibility Study of Open Radical Cystectomy (ORC) Versus Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy With Intracorporal Urinary Diversion (iRARC) Under an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Setup | ||||
Brief Summary | The purpose of the study to compare two established methods of radical cystectomy (RC) in patients with bladder cancer. The participants will be treated under conditions in alignment with up-to-date guidelines and care. We wish to investigate whether it is feasible to compare the two methods under conditions of the highest methodological quality. | ||||
Detailed Description |
Radical cystectomy (RC) is a comprehensive surgery including pelvic lymph node dissection and urinary diversion. The surgery is originally performed as an open procedure (ORC) but with advances in technology the procedure is now also offered as a robot-assisted laparoscopic procedure (RARC). It remains questionable if RARC is superior to ORC in terms of surgical outcomes. Several studies have described outcomes following RARC of which most are comparative studies with only five studies being randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Overall, significant differences in operating room time, estimated blood loss, time to flatus and bowel movement as well as use of morphine sulfate equivalents in favor of RARC has been demonstrated with the exception of operating room time. However, no studies have demonstrated a significant reduction in risk of 30- or 90-day complication rates between ORC and RARC. The RCTs have not been blinded, and therefore may be subject to bias in terms of expectations from patients and care providers. Also, in the already conducted RCTs of ORC versus RARC the urinary diversion has been done extracorporally. Today, it is possible to conduct the whole procedure of RARC intracorporally (iRARC), potentially reducing the surgical stress further. Lastly, the previously conducted RCTs have not consequently been managed under an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) setup. Currently, a multicenter study comparing ORC with RARC is recruiting in the United Kingdom in which the patients are treated with iRARC and under an ERAS setup. The present study will compare the two methods blinded for the participants and all health care providers involved in the postoperative care from the time the patient exits the operating room (OR). Blinded studies in surgery are rare but in gastrointestinal surgery, a blinded study of open versus laparoscopic colonic resection has demonstrated to be feasible and thus we believe that such study must be feasible in an RC setting. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to either ORC or RARC. Blinding: The study is blinded for the patient and for the group of nurses and doctors that will be responsible for the postoperative care. The postoperative care will be managed by members of the bladder cancer team other than the operating surgeon, and OR staff will not be involved in the postoperative care. The abdominal wound will be bandaged to hide the wounds from both an open and laparoscopic procedure. The blinding will be maintained until discharge from hospital. |
||||
Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
Study Phase ICMJE | Not Applicable | ||||
Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double (Participant, Care Provider) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
||||
Condition ICMJE | Urinary Bladder Neoplasms | ||||
Intervention ICMJE | Procedure: Radical Cystectomy
Participants are randomly and blinded assigned
|
||||
Study Arms ICMJE |
|
||||
Publications * | Not Provided | ||||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
Recruitment Information | |||||
Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed | ||||
Actual Enrollment ICMJE |
50 | ||||
Original Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
Actual Study Completion Date ICMJE | January 20, 2021 | ||||
Actual Primary Completion Date | November 1, 2020 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Eligibility Criteria ICMJE |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
Sex/Gender ICMJE |
|
||||
Ages ICMJE | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) | ||||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE | No | ||||
Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||
Listed Location Countries ICMJE | Denmark | ||||
Removed Location Countries | |||||
Administrative Information | |||||
NCT Number ICMJE | NCT03977831 | ||||
Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | H-18056682-D | ||||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | Not Provided | ||||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product |
|
||||
IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE |
|
||||
Responsible Party | Ulla Nordström Joensen, Rigshospitalet, Denmark | ||||
Study Sponsor ICMJE | Rigshospitalet, Denmark | ||||
Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
Investigators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
PRS Account | Rigshospitalet, Denmark | ||||
Verification Date | January 2021 | ||||
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |