| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Class III Malocclusion Cross Bite Orthodontic Appliance Complication | Device: Removable Mandibular Retractor Device: Bone-anchored intermaxillary traction | Not Applicable |
The acceptance of orthodontic appliance is measured by the amount of discomfort occurring during orthodontic treatment. Different feelings can be encountered during the course of orthodontic treatment such as pressure, tension and pain. Pain is defined as an unpleasant feeling and a bad subjective experience combined with internal or external reason and it is considered as the most annoying factor during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance. In a study by Oliver and Knappman, patients stated that the worse thing related to the orthodontic treatment was pain and 70% of the subjects suffered from pain during orthodontic treatment regardless the appliance' type. The fear from the pain is considered as the most important factor that not encourage patient to ask orthodontic treatment.Many studies demonstrated that there were no differences in the amount of the pain resulted from the orthodontic treatment between males and females [2, 5]. In a study of the reasons which make patient stopped the orthodontic treatment, Haynes found that the pain was the first reason, whereas the second one was the effect of the orthodontic appliance on the patient's daily social life.
When reviewing the medical literature, few studies have been found to identify the patient acceptance degree to the orthodontic appliance used for treating Class III cases in general and Class III functional appliances in particular.Removable appliances were evaluated by a series of publications by Sergl et al in Germany.Additionally, when rigorous study designs are considered utilizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs), there are only few RCTs in the dental literature that evaluated patients' responses towards orthodontic treatment. Idris et al., evaluated Class II growing patients undergoing functional orthopedic corrections, whereas Khattab et al., compared labial brackets versus lingual brackets in terms of speech and functional impairments. Recently, Saleh et al., evaluated the levels of acceptance towards the removable mandibular retractor (RMR) when treating young children with Class III malocclusion in the late primary dentition and early mixed dentition (i.e. between 5 and 9 years) and found high levels of acceptance recommending the need for further analysis of patients' responses to this appliance in older age groups.
Bone-anchored intermaxillary elastics have been proposed as a method of correcting Class III deformities. Although this method was compared to the removable mandibular retractor in terms of skeletal and dentoalveolar changes, but the published paper did not report any information about the associated levels of pain and discomfort as well the general acceptability to this treatment modality.
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Actual Enrollment : | 38 participants |
| Allocation: | Randomized |
| Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
| Masking: | Single (Outcomes Assessor) |
| Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
| Official Title: | Evaluation of Pain, Discomfort and Acceptance During the Orthodontic Treatment of Class III Malocclusion Using Bone-anchored Intermaxillary Traction Versus the Removable Mandibular Retractor: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
| Actual Study Start Date : | February 15, 2015 |
| Actual Primary Completion Date : | October 1, 2015 |
| Actual Study Completion Date : | May 10, 2016 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Removable Mandibular Retractor
Patients in this group will be treated by the Removable Mandibular Retractor (RMR) in order to get rid of the anterior cross bite. This appliance is removable.
|
Device: Removable Mandibular Retractor
The appliance will be used 18 hours per day. It can only be removed for eating meals.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Bone-anchored intermaxillary Traction
Patients will be treated using bone-anchored intermaxillary traction. Class III elastics will be extended from the Adam's clasps placed in the upper removable appliance towards the heads of mini-implants placed between the permanent canine and lateral incisors on either side of the lower dental arch.
|
Device: Bone-anchored intermaxillary traction
The patients will be instructed to wear the upper removable appliance for 18 hours per day. The elastics should be extended from the upper appliance towards the lower mini-screws.
Other Name: BAIMT
|
Patients will be asked this question about their sensation of tension or pressure (Item no 01):
Do you have a sense of tension and pressure in your soft tissues?
A standardized questionnaire will be used to assess pain, discomfort and functional impairments' levels during the first six months of treatment.
A four-point Likert scale is going to be used consisting of: (not at all), (little), (much) or (very much) to which points 0, 1, 2 and 3 respectively are going to be ascribed. Each questionnaire is going to be completed by the child in the presence of one of his/her parents.
Patients will be asked this question about their perception of pain (Item no 02):
'Have you experienced any degree of pain?'
A standardized questionnaire will be used to assess pain, discomfort and functional impairments' levels during the first six months of treatment. A four-point Likert scale is going to be used consisting of: (not at all), (little), (much) or (very much) to which points 0, 1, 2 and 3 respectively are going to be ascribed. Each questionnaire is going to be completed by the child in the presence of one of his/her parents.
Patients will be asked this question about any change encountered in the articulation of sounds (Item no 03):
'Do you feel that your articulation has changed?'
A standardized questionnaire will be used to assess pain, discomfort and functional impairments' levels during the first six months of treatment. A four-point Likert scale is going to be used consisting of: (not at all), (little), (much) or (very much) to which points 0, 1, 2 and 3 respectively are going to be ascribed. Each questionnaire is going to be completed by the child in the presence of one of his/her parents.
Patients will be asked this question about any difficulties encountered during swallowing (Item no 04):
'Do you have difficulty in swallowing?'
A standardized questionnaire will be used to assess pain, discomfort and functional impairments' levels during the first six months of treatment. A four-point Likert scale is going to be used consisting of: (not at all), (little), (much) or (very much) to which points 0, 1, 2 and 3 respectively are going to be ascribed. Each questionnaire is going to be completed by the child in the presence of one of his/her parents.
Patients will be asked this question about any restrictions encountered in lower jaw movements (Item no 05):
'Do you have a sense of your mandible movement being restricted?'
A standardized questionnaire will be used to assess pain, discomfort and functional impairments' levels during the first six months of treatment. A four-point Likert scale is going to be used consisting of: (not at all), (little), (much) or (very much) to which points 0, 1, 2 and 3 respectively are going to be ascribed. Each questionnaire is going to be completed by the child in the presence of one of his/her parents.
Patients will be asked this question about their feelings when meeting other people regarding self-confidence (Item no 06):
'Do you have any feeling of embarrassment or lack of confidence?'
A standardized questionnaire will be used to assess pain, discomfort and functional impairments' levels during the first six months of treatment. A four-point Likert scale is going to be used consisting of: (not at all), (little), (much) or (very much) to which points 0, 1, 2 and 3 respectively are going to be ascribed. Each questionnaire is going to be completed by the child in the presence of one of his/her parents.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 9 Years to 12 Years (Child) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
| Syrian Arab Republic | |
| Orthodontic Department, University of Hama Dental School | |
| Hamah, Syrian Arab Republic, 12JO76WH | |
| Principal Investigator: | Abdulmalek MR Majanni, DDS MSc | PhD student, Orthodontics Department, University of Damascus Dental School | |
| Study Director: | Mohammad Y Hajeer, DDS MSc PhD | Associate Professor of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School |
| Tracking Information | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Submitted Date ICMJE | June 4, 2019 | ||||||
| First Posted Date ICMJE | June 6, 2019 | ||||||
| Last Update Posted Date | June 6, 2019 | ||||||
| Actual Study Start Date ICMJE | February 15, 2015 | ||||||
| Actual Primary Completion Date | October 1, 2015 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||
| Change History | No Changes Posted | ||||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||
| Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||||
| Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Evaluation of Pain, Discomfort and Acceptance During the Orthodontic Treatment of Class III Malocclusion | ||||||
| Official Title ICMJE | Evaluation of Pain, Discomfort and Acceptance During the Orthodontic Treatment of Class III Malocclusion Using Bone-anchored Intermaxillary Traction Versus the Removable Mandibular Retractor: A Randomized Controlled Trial | ||||||
| Brief Summary | The aim of this study is to evaluate the levels of pain, discomfort and acceptance between two treatment modalities of Class III correction of growing patients in the late mixed dentition period. | ||||||
| Detailed Description |
The acceptance of orthodontic appliance is measured by the amount of discomfort occurring during orthodontic treatment. Different feelings can be encountered during the course of orthodontic treatment such as pressure, tension and pain. Pain is defined as an unpleasant feeling and a bad subjective experience combined with internal or external reason and it is considered as the most annoying factor during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance. In a study by Oliver and Knappman, patients stated that the worse thing related to the orthodontic treatment was pain and 70% of the subjects suffered from pain during orthodontic treatment regardless the appliance' type. The fear from the pain is considered as the most important factor that not encourage patient to ask orthodontic treatment.Many studies demonstrated that there were no differences in the amount of the pain resulted from the orthodontic treatment between males and females [2, 5]. In a study of the reasons which make patient stopped the orthodontic treatment, Haynes found that the pain was the first reason, whereas the second one was the effect of the orthodontic appliance on the patient's daily social life. When reviewing the medical literature, few studies have been found to identify the patient acceptance degree to the orthodontic appliance used for treating Class III cases in general and Class III functional appliances in particular.Removable appliances were evaluated by a series of publications by Sergl et al in Germany.Additionally, when rigorous study designs are considered utilizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs), there are only few RCTs in the dental literature that evaluated patients' responses towards orthodontic treatment. Idris et al., evaluated Class II growing patients undergoing functional orthopedic corrections, whereas Khattab et al., compared labial brackets versus lingual brackets in terms of speech and functional impairments. Recently, Saleh et al., evaluated the levels of acceptance towards the removable mandibular retractor (RMR) when treating young children with Class III malocclusion in the late primary dentition and early mixed dentition (i.e. between 5 and 9 years) and found high levels of acceptance recommending the need for further analysis of patients' responses to this appliance in older age groups. Bone-anchored intermaxillary elastics have been proposed as a method of correcting Class III deformities. Although this method was compared to the removable mandibular retractor in terms of skeletal and dentoalveolar changes, but the published paper did not report any information about the associated levels of pain and discomfort as well the general acceptability to this treatment modality. |
||||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||||
| Study Phase ICMJE | Not Applicable | ||||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single (Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
||||||
| Condition ICMJE |
|
||||||
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||||
| Study Arms ICMJE |
|
||||||
| Publications * |
|
||||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed | ||||||
| Actual Enrollment ICMJE |
38 | ||||||
| Original Actual Enrollment ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||
| Actual Study Completion Date ICMJE | May 10, 2016 | ||||||
| Actual Primary Completion Date | October 1, 2015 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||||
| Sex/Gender ICMJE |
|
||||||
| Ages ICMJE | 9 Years to 12 Years (Child) | ||||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE | No | ||||||
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||||
| Listed Location Countries ICMJE | Syrian Arab Republic | ||||||
| Removed Location Countries | |||||||
| Administrative Information | |||||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT03976635 | ||||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | UDDS-Ortho-01-2019 | ||||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes | ||||||
| U.S. FDA-regulated Product |
|
||||||
| IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE |
|
||||||
| Responsible Party | Damascus University | ||||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Damascus University | ||||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Hama University | ||||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||||
| PRS Account | Damascus University | ||||||
| Verification Date | June 2019 | ||||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||||