4006-776-356 出国就医服务电话

免费获得国外相关药品,最快 1 个工作日回馈药物信息

出境医 / 临床实验 / Clinical Efficacy of Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Microwave Ablation for Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer. (Ckvsmalm)

Clinical Efficacy of Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Microwave Ablation for Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer. (Ckvsmalm)

Study Description
Brief Summary:
Data of 100 colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases who received stereotactic radiotherapy of Cyberknife or microwave ablation in the multicenter of the research group from June 2019 to May 2021 were collected, as well as follow-up data.To evaluate the clinical efficacy of stereotactic radiotherapy and microwave ablation in liver metastases.In addition, the local control rate and side effects of stereotactic radiotherapy and microwave ablation in the treatment of liver metastases were explored, and the efficacy and safety of different doses of stereotactic radiotherapy were determined.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Radiotherapy Microwave Ablation Liver Metastases Colorectal Cancer Radiation: stereotactic radiotherapy Other: microwave alabation Not Applicable

Show Show detailed description
Study Design
Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 100 participants
Allocation: Non-Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description: non-randomized trial
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Clinical Efficacy of Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Microwave Ablation for Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer: a Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study
Actual Study Start Date : June 3, 2019
Estimated Primary Completion Date : May 31, 2021
Estimated Study Completion Date : May 31, 2022
Arms and Interventions
Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Stereotactic radiotherapy
In this study, the liver metastases were treated with Cyberknife stereotactic radiotherapy.Using multimodal image fusion to outline the target area.According to the volume, location, organ function and other factors, the dosage of radiotherapy was determined. The range of BED value of radiotherapy was 90-120 when the distance between the tumor and gastrointestinal tract was more than 5 mm (alpha/beta=10) and 70-90 when the distance between the tumor and gastrointestinal tract was less than 5 mm (alpha/beta=10).
Radiation: stereotactic radiotherapy
The liver metastases were treated with Cyberknife stereotactic radiotherapy.Using multimodal image fusion to outline the target area.According to the volume, location, organ function and other factors, the dosage of radiotherapy was determined. The range of BED value of radiotherapy was 90-120 when the distance between the tumor and gastrointestinal tract was more than 5 mm (alpha/beta=10) and 70-90 when the distance between the tumor and gastrointestinal tract was less than 5 mm (alpha/beta=10).

Experimental: Microwave ablation therapy
In this study, 3D printing template was used to assist microwave ablation.For those whose lesions are directly smaller than 5.0cm, the ablation time is about 10 min and 15 min, and the ablation time is more than 15min in patients larger than 5.0cm.
Other: microwave alabation
The colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases will receive microwave ablation.3D printing template was used to assist microwave ablation.For those whose lesions are directly smaller than 5.0cm, the ablation time is about 10 min and 15 min, and the ablation time is more than 15min in patients larger than 5.0cm.

Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Local control rate [ Time Frame: 3 years after the treatment ]
    Local control refers to the fact that the tumor is not enlarged on imaging, but if the tumor is not enlarged, the patients with aggravated symptoms after treatment are not included in the local control range.

  2. Objective response rate [ Time Frame: 1 years after the treatment ]
    The proportion of patients whose tumors have shrunk to a certain extent and maintained for a certain period of time, including CR + PR cases

  3. Disease control rate [ Time Frame: 3 years after the treatment ]
    After treatment, the number of cases with remission and stable lesions accounted for the percentage of the total number of assessable cases

  4. PFS [ Time Frame: 3 years after the treatment ]
    The time interval of disease progression since the date of diagnosis


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Overall survival [ Time Frame: 3 years after the treatment ]
    The time from enrollment to death from any cause

  2. Side effects [ Time Frame: 1 years after the treatment ]
    Harmful reactions unrelated to the purpose of treatment occur in the course of the treatment of a disease

  3. Quality of life score of tumor patients(0-60) [ Time Frame: 3 years after the treatment ]
    Common methods for evaluating the quality of life of patients:The full score of quality of life is 60, the worst is < 20, the worse is 21-30, the average is 31-40, the better is 41-50, and the good is 51-60.


Eligibility Criteria
Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 80 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The age was 18 to 80 years old.
  • It was confirmed by pathology that the liver metastasis of colorectal cancer was less than or equal to 3 lesions, each lesion was less than 3 cm, and there was no invasion of vascular tumor thrombus and adjacent organs according to the discussion of MDT.
  • The preoperative imaging evaluation of iatrogenic or / and personal factors can realize microwave ablation or radiosurgery SBRT to require.
  • The primary lesion has been treated radical and has no evidence of recurrence, and there is no metastasis outside the liver.
  • The physical status score of ECOG : 0 ≥ 1 or more than 60 KPS.
  • Predicted survival time was more than 3 months.
  • The main organ function can tolerate stereotactic radiotherapy / microwave ablation, liver function child-pugh A or B, no severe hypertension, diabetes and heart disease. That is, within 14 days of random examination, the relevant test indexes meet the following requirements:

    1. blood routine examination: i. Hemoglobin was more than 90 g /L (no blood transfusion); ii. Neutrophil count was more than 1.5x109/L; iii platelet count was more than 100x109/ L;
    2. biochemical examination: i. total cholerythrin-1.5-ultraln (upper limit of normal); ii. Blood-valley-pyruvic transaminase (ALT) or blood-glutamic-aspartate aminotransferase (AST), 2.5-hulled; iii. The clearance of endophytic muscle was 60 ml/ min (ckroft-gault formula);
    3. cardiac Doppler ultrasound assessment: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was more than 50%;
    4. blood glucose control was less than 7.2 mmol/ L, non-fasting blood glucose was less than 10 mmol/L, and glycosylated hemoglobin was less than 7%.
  • Sign informed consent form.
  • Good compliance, family agreed to cooperate with follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are being treated with drugs and whose liver metastases are stable or relieved, and who have participated in clinical trials of other drugs within four weeks;
  • There was a history of bleeding, and any serious bleeding events of 3 degrees or more in ctcae 5.0 occurred within 4 weeks before screening.
  • Patients with known central nervous system metastasis or history of central nervous system metastasis before screening. For patients with suspected central nervous system metastasis, CT or MRI examination must be performed within 14 days before randomization to exclude central nervous system metastasis.
  • Patients with high blood pressure and single step-down medications were not able to obtain good control (systolic blood pressure was more than 140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure was more than 90 mmHg); patients with a history of unstable angina; a new diagnosis within 3 months before screening was an event of myocardial infarction within 6 months before or after screening; Arrhythmias (including QTCF: male,450 ms, female, 470ms) require long-term use of anti-arrhythmic drugs and the New York Heart Association rating of grade ii cardiac insufficiency;
  • Long-term unhealed wounds or incomplete fractures,
  • Imaging showed that the tumor had invaded the perivascular area of important vessels or was judged by researchers that the tumor was highly likely to invade important blood vessels during treatment, resulting in fatal massive bleeding.
  • Patients with abnormal coagulation function and bleeding tendency (14 days before randomization must be satisfied:INR is within the normal range without anticoagulant); Patients treated with anticoagulant or vitamin k antagonists such as warfarin, heparin or its analogues; Low dose warfarin (1mg oral, once a day) or low dose aspirin (not exceeding 100 mg); per day) is allowed for prophylactic purposes on the premise that the international standardized ratio of prothrombin time (INR) was less than 1.5;
  • Hyperarteriovenous thrombosis occurred within 6 months before screening, such as cerebrovascular accidents (including temporary ischemic seizures), Deep venous thrombosis (except where venous thrombosis caused by intravenous catheterization after pre-chemotherapy has been cured by researchers) and pulmonary embolism, etc.
  • There was abnormal thyroid function in the past, and even in the case of drug treatment, thyroid function could not be maintained within the normal range;
  • Having a history of psychotropic substance abuse and unable to give up or have mental disorders.
  • Radiotherapy for abdominal tumors has been carried out in the past.
  • Have a history of immunodeficiency, or suffer from other acquired, congenital immunodeficiency diseases, or have a history of organ transplantation.
  • According to the researchers' judgment, there are serious diseases that endanger the safety of patients or affect the completion of the study.
Contacts and Locations

Contacts
Layout table for location contacts
Contact: Junjie U Wang, MD +8682264910 ext +8682264910 junjiewang_edu@sina.cn
Contact: Fei U Xu, M Med +8618511866032 ext +8682264910 xufeibysy@163.com

Locations
Layout table for location information
China, Beijing
Beijing Ditan Hospital Recruiting
Beijing, Beijing, China, 100000
Contact: Wei Li, MD         
Peking University Third Hospital Recruiting
Beijing, Beijing, China, 100000
Contact: Junjie Wang, Chairman    +8682264910    junjiewang_edu@sina.cn   
Contact: Fei Xu    +8618511866032    xufeibysy@163.com   
Principal Investigator: Junjie Wang, Chairman         
Sub-Investigator: Fei Xu         
Sub-Investigator: Fuxin Guo         
The fifth medical center of PLA general hospital Recruiting
Beijing, Beijing, China, 100000
Contact: Xuezhang Duan, director    +8613621386161    13621386161@163.com   
Principal Investigator: Xuezhang Duan         
Sub-Investigator: Hui Xie         
Sub-Investigator: Jing Sun         
China, Guangxi
Guangxi ruikang hospital Recruiting
NanNing, Guangxi, China, 530000
Contact: ZuPing Lian, M Med         
China, Hunan
Hunan Aerospace Hospital Recruiting
Changsha, Hunan, China, 410205
Contact: Xian Xu, MD         
China, Shandong
Tengzhou Central People's Hospital Recruiting
Tengzhou, Shandong, China, 277599
Contact: Kaixian Zhang, director    +8613563200960    kaixianzhang@aliyun.com   
Principal Investigator: Kaixian Zhang, director         
Sponsors and Collaborators
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing 302 Hospital
Tengzhou Central People's Hospital
Guangxi Ruikang Hospital
Hunan Aerospace Hospital
Beijing Ditan Hospital
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Study Chair: Junjie U Wang, MD Peking University Third Hospital
Study Director: Fei U Xu, M Med Peking University Third Hospital
Principal Investigator: Xuezhang Duan, MD Beijing 302 Hospital
Principal Investigator: Kaixian Zhang, MD Tengzhou Central People's Hospital
Principal Investigator: Wei Li, MD Beijing Ditan Hospital
Principal Investigator: Hui Xie, MD Beijing 302 Hospital
Principal Investigator: Zuping Lian, MD Guangxi Ruikang Hospital
Principal Investigator: Xian Xu, M Med Hunan Aerospace Hospital
Principal Investigator: Fuxin Guo, MD Peking University Third Hospital
Principal Investigator: Jing Sun, M Med Beijing 302 Hospital
Tracking Information
First Submitted Date  ICMJE May 21, 2019
First Posted Date  ICMJE May 28, 2019
Last Update Posted Date July 19, 2019
Actual Study Start Date  ICMJE June 3, 2019
Estimated Primary Completion Date May 31, 2021   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Current Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: May 23, 2019)
  • Local control rate [ Time Frame: 3 years after the treatment ]
    Local control refers to the fact that the tumor is not enlarged on imaging, but if the tumor is not enlarged, the patients with aggravated symptoms after treatment are not included in the local control range.
  • Objective response rate [ Time Frame: 1 years after the treatment ]
    The proportion of patients whose tumors have shrunk to a certain extent and maintained for a certain period of time, including CR + PR cases
  • Disease control rate [ Time Frame: 3 years after the treatment ]
    After treatment, the number of cases with remission and stable lesions accounted for the percentage of the total number of assessable cases
  • PFS [ Time Frame: 3 years after the treatment ]
    The time interval of disease progression since the date of diagnosis
Original Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE Same as current
Change History
Current Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: May 23, 2019)
  • Overall survival [ Time Frame: 3 years after the treatment ]
    The time from enrollment to death from any cause
  • Side effects [ Time Frame: 1 years after the treatment ]
    Harmful reactions unrelated to the purpose of treatment occur in the course of the treatment of a disease
  • Quality of life score of tumor patients(0-60) [ Time Frame: 3 years after the treatment ]
    Common methods for evaluating the quality of life of patients:The full score of quality of life is 60, the worst is < 20, the worse is 21-30, the average is 31-40, the better is 41-50, and the good is 51-60.
Original Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE Same as current
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
 
Descriptive Information
Brief Title  ICMJE Clinical Efficacy of Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Microwave Ablation for Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer.
Official Title  ICMJE Clinical Efficacy of Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Microwave Ablation for Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer: a Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study
Brief Summary Data of 100 colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases who received stereotactic radiotherapy of Cyberknife or microwave ablation in the multicenter of the research group from June 2019 to May 2021 were collected, as well as follow-up data.To evaluate the clinical efficacy of stereotactic radiotherapy and microwave ablation in liver metastases.In addition, the local control rate and side effects of stereotactic radiotherapy and microwave ablation in the treatment of liver metastases were explored, and the efficacy and safety of different doses of stereotactic radiotherapy were determined.
Detailed Description

In the study,data of 100 colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases who received Cyberknife stereotactic radiotherapy or microwave ablation in the multi-center of the research group from June 2019 to May 2021 were collected, as well as follow-up data.

  1. Radiation: Stereotactic Radiotherapy 1.1 Equipment: Accuray VSI Cyberknife stereotactic radiotherapy platform, simulated positioning CT machine, MR, positron emission computed tomography PET-CT, vacuum pad.

    1.2 Radiotherapy localization: CT, MRI and PETCT were used to simulate localization.

    1.3 Relevant Definitions of Tumor Targets CT, MRI, PET-CT fusion, combined with MRI location and PET-CT location image for sketching.

    To delineate target areas and organs at risk. GTV: Combining localization and fusion images to delineate the tumors seen PTV = GTV + 0-10mm Dangerous organs: The stomach, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, colon, spinal cord and esophagus were delineated on the base sequence of CT plain scan.

    The target area should be approved by at least one physician in charge or by a physician in charge.

    1.4 Target volume radiation dose: According to the volume, location, organ function and other factors, the dosage of radiotherapy was determined. The range of BED value of radiotherapy was 90-120 when the distance between the tumor and gastrointestinal tract was more than 5 mm (alpha/beta=10) and 70-90 when the distance between the tumor and gastrointestinal tract was less than 5 mm (alpha/beta=10).

    1.5 Normal Tissue Limit: Reference to TG101 Report

  2. Microwave ablation 2.1 Preoperative positioning and planning: 2.1.1 Determine the fixing device: generally choose vacuum pad to fix 2.1.2 Choosing the right position: The principle is to choose the position that is easy to operate, taking into account the comfort and tolerance of patients.

2.1.3 CT scan 2.1.4 The range of tumors was determined by CT images. In principle, at the maximum level, the skin points corresponding to the vertical center of the tumor are the marker points of the locating needle. At the same time, the center of the tumor was taken as the origin point, and the longitudinal and transverse cross lines were drawn on the patient's body surface. Roughly delineate the range of tumors according to CT in body surface 2.2 Surgery and intraoperative optimization 2.2.1 Posture reduction and fixation of patients 2.2.2 Oxygen inhalation, ECG and blood pressure monitoring 2.2.3 Installation of 3D Printing Planar Coordinate Template Fixer 2.2.4 Routine disinfection, cave towel laying, local infiltration anesthesia, fixing 3D printing plane coordinate template according to the range of tumors determined by physical examination and preoperative plan, and adjusting the direction of plane template by protractor.

2.2.5 Puncture locating needle and puncture assistant fixing needle in 4 directions of tumor margin.

2.2.6The real-time CT 2.5mm image was imported into the navigation system, the puncture needle was marked, the puncture needle was simulated, and the resolution of the template was adjusted accurately.

2.2.7 Enhanced CT scan to determine the position and angle of template and pin accurately 2.2.8 Layer by layer puncture according to preoperative plan 2.2.9 After inserting the ablation antenna to the reserved position, scan CT again to confirm whether the puncture needle has reached the planned position. 2.2.10 Complete ablation of tumors as planned.

2.3Postoperative observation 2.3.1 With the assistance of the staff in the hospital, they will be transported back to the ward by flat car with their families.

2.3.2 Re-measurement of blood pressure and heart rate 2.3.3Observe whether there is bleeding or exudation at the puncture point after operation, and give hemostasis and pain relief if necessary.

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of stereotactic radiotherapy and microwave ablation in liver metastases after these treatment.In addition, the local control rate and side effects of stereotactic radiotherapy and microwave ablation in the treatment of liver metastases were explored, and the efficacy and safety of different doses of stereotactic radiotherapy were determined.

Study Type  ICMJE Interventional
Study Phase  ICMJE Not Applicable
Study Design  ICMJE Allocation: Non-Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
non-randomized trial
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Condition  ICMJE
  • Radiotherapy
  • Microwave Ablation
  • Liver Metastases
  • Colorectal Cancer
Intervention  ICMJE
  • Radiation: stereotactic radiotherapy
    The liver metastases were treated with Cyberknife stereotactic radiotherapy.Using multimodal image fusion to outline the target area.According to the volume, location, organ function and other factors, the dosage of radiotherapy was determined. The range of BED value of radiotherapy was 90-120 when the distance between the tumor and gastrointestinal tract was more than 5 mm (alpha/beta=10) and 70-90 when the distance between the tumor and gastrointestinal tract was less than 5 mm (alpha/beta=10).
  • Other: microwave alabation
    The colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases will receive microwave ablation.3D printing template was used to assist microwave ablation.For those whose lesions are directly smaller than 5.0cm, the ablation time is about 10 min and 15 min, and the ablation time is more than 15min in patients larger than 5.0cm.
Study Arms  ICMJE
  • Experimental: Stereotactic radiotherapy
    In this study, the liver metastases were treated with Cyberknife stereotactic radiotherapy.Using multimodal image fusion to outline the target area.According to the volume, location, organ function and other factors, the dosage of radiotherapy was determined. The range of BED value of radiotherapy was 90-120 when the distance between the tumor and gastrointestinal tract was more than 5 mm (alpha/beta=10) and 70-90 when the distance between the tumor and gastrointestinal tract was less than 5 mm (alpha/beta=10).
    Intervention: Radiation: stereotactic radiotherapy
  • Experimental: Microwave ablation therapy
    In this study, 3D printing template was used to assist microwave ablation.For those whose lesions are directly smaller than 5.0cm, the ablation time is about 10 min and 15 min, and the ablation time is more than 15min in patients larger than 5.0cm.
    Intervention: Other: microwave alabation
Publications *
  • Yuan ZY, Meng MB, Liu CL, Wang HH, Jiang C, Song YC, Zhuang HQ, Yang D, Wang JS, Wei W, Li FT, Zhao LJ, Wang P. Stereotactic body radiation therapy using the CyberKnife(®) system for patients with liver metastases. Onco Targets Ther. 2014 Jun 12;7:915-23. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S58409. eCollection 2014.
  • Mihara K, Kaihara M, Sunahori S, Yamashiro N, Nishiya S, Ito Y, Funakoshi K, Egawa T, Tsukamoto N, Nagashima A. [Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy with CyberKnife®for Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancer]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2015 Oct;42(10):1262-4. Japanese.
  • Kress MS, Collins BT, Collins SP, Dritschilo A, Gagnon G, Unger K. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases from colorectal cancer: analysis of safety, feasibility, and early outcomes. Front Oncol. 2012 Feb 2;2:8. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2012.00008. eCollection 2012.
  • Dewas S, Bibault JE, Mirabel X, Fumagalli I, Kramar A, Jarraya H, Lacornerie T, Dewas-Vautravers C, Lartigau E. Prognostic factors affecting local control of hepatic tumors treated by Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Radiat Oncol. 2012 Oct 10;7:166. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-166.
  • Herfarth KK, Debus J, Wannenmacher M. Stereotactic radiation therapy of liver metastases: update of the initial phase-I/II trial. Front Radiat Ther Oncol. 2004;38:100-5.
  • Méndez Romero A, Wunderink W, Hussain SM, De Pooter JA, Heijmen BJ, Nowak PC, Nuyttens JJ, Brandwijk RP, Verhoef C, Ijzermans JN, Levendag PC. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary and metastatic liver tumors: A single institution phase i-ii study. Acta Oncol. 2006;45(7):831-7.
  • Hoyer M, Roed H, Traberg Hansen A, Ohlhuis L, Petersen J, Nellemann H, Kiil Berthelsen A, Grau C, Aage Engelholm S, Von der Maase H. Phase II study on stereotactic body radiotherapy of colorectal metastases. Acta Oncol. 2006;45(7):823-30.
  • Lee MT, Kim JJ, Dinniwell R, Brierley J, Lockwood G, Wong R, Cummings B, Ringash J, Tse RV, Knox JJ, Dawson LA. Phase I study of individualized stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver metastases. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Apr 1;27(10):1585-91. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.0600. Epub 2009 Mar 2.
  • Lanciano R, Lamond J, Yang J, Feng J, Arrigo S, Good M, Brady L. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for patients with heavily pretreated liver metastases and liver tumors. Front Oncol. 2012 Mar 9;2:23. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2012.00023. eCollection 2012.
  • Ambrosino G, Polistina F, Costantin G, Francescon P, Guglielmi R, Zanco P, Casamassima F, Febbraro A, Gerunda G, Lumachi F. Image-guided robotic stereotactic radiosurgery for unresectable liver metastases: preliminary results. Anticancer Res. 2009 Aug;29(8):3381-4.
  • Rusthoven KE, Kavanagh BD, Cardenes H, Stieber VW, Burri SH, Feigenberg SJ, Chidel MA, Pugh TJ, Franklin W, Kane M, Gaspar LE, Schefter TE. Multi-institutional phase I/II trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Apr 1;27(10):1572-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.6329. Epub 2009 Mar 2.
  • Katz AW, Carey-Sampson M, Muhs AG, Milano MT, Schell MC, Okunieff P. Hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for limited hepatic metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Mar 1;67(3):793-8. Epub 2006 Dec 29.
  • Yamashita H, Onishi H, Matsumoto Y, Murakami N, Matsuo Y, Nomiya T, Nakagawa K; Japanese Radiological Society multi-institutional SBRT study group (JRS-SBRTSG). Local effect of stereotactic body radiotherapy for primary and metastatic liver tumors in 130 Japanese patients. Radiat Oncol. 2014 May 10;9:112. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-9-112.
  • Benedict SH, Yenice KM, Followill D, Galvin JM, Hinson W, Kavanagh B, Keall P, Lovelock M, Meeks S, Papiez L, Purdie T, Sadagopan R, Schell MC, Salter B, Schlesinger DJ, Shiu AS, Solberg T, Song DY, Stieber V, Timmerman R, Tomé WA, Verellen D, Wang L, Yin FF. Stereotactic body radiation therapy: the report of AAPM Task Group 101. Med Phys. 2010 Aug;37(8):4078-101. Erratum in: Med Phys. 2012 Jan;39(1):563. Dosage error in article text.
  • Groeschl RT, Pilgrim CH, Hanna EM, Simo KA, Swan RZ, Sindram D, Martinie JB, Iannitti DA, Bloomston M, Schmidt C, Khabiri H, Shirley LA, Martin RC, Tsai S, Turaga KK, Christians KK, Rilling WS, Gamblin TC. Microwave ablation for hepatic malignancies: a multiinstitutional analysis. Ann Surg. 2014 Jun;259(6):1195-200. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000234.
  • Xu S, Hu K, Huang H, Yao Z, Wang Q, Yang P, Liu B, Yang Y, Chen G. [Effect of laparoscopic hepatectomy and microwave ablation for colorectal liver metastases]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2015 Oct;95(40):3289-92. Chinese.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruitment Information
Recruitment Status  ICMJE Recruiting
Estimated Enrollment  ICMJE
 (submitted: May 23, 2019)
100
Original Estimated Enrollment  ICMJE Same as current
Estimated Study Completion Date  ICMJE May 31, 2022
Estimated Primary Completion Date May 31, 2021   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Eligibility Criteria  ICMJE

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The age was 18 to 80 years old.
  • It was confirmed by pathology that the liver metastasis of colorectal cancer was less than or equal to 3 lesions, each lesion was less than 3 cm, and there was no invasion of vascular tumor thrombus and adjacent organs according to the discussion of MDT.
  • The preoperative imaging evaluation of iatrogenic or / and personal factors can realize microwave ablation or radiosurgery SBRT to require.
  • The primary lesion has been treated radical and has no evidence of recurrence, and there is no metastasis outside the liver.
  • The physical status score of ECOG : 0 ≥ 1 or more than 60 KPS.
  • Predicted survival time was more than 3 months.
  • The main organ function can tolerate stereotactic radiotherapy / microwave ablation, liver function child-pugh A or B, no severe hypertension, diabetes and heart disease. That is, within 14 days of random examination, the relevant test indexes meet the following requirements:

    1. blood routine examination: i. Hemoglobin was more than 90 g /L (no blood transfusion); ii. Neutrophil count was more than 1.5x109/L; iii platelet count was more than 100x109/ L;
    2. biochemical examination: i. total cholerythrin-1.5-ultraln (upper limit of normal); ii. Blood-valley-pyruvic transaminase (ALT) or blood-glutamic-aspartate aminotransferase (AST), 2.5-hulled; iii. The clearance of endophytic muscle was 60 ml/ min (ckroft-gault formula);
    3. cardiac Doppler ultrasound assessment: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was more than 50%;
    4. blood glucose control was less than 7.2 mmol/ L, non-fasting blood glucose was less than 10 mmol/L, and glycosylated hemoglobin was less than 7%.
  • Sign informed consent form.
  • Good compliance, family agreed to cooperate with follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are being treated with drugs and whose liver metastases are stable or relieved, and who have participated in clinical trials of other drugs within four weeks;
  • There was a history of bleeding, and any serious bleeding events of 3 degrees or more in ctcae 5.0 occurred within 4 weeks before screening.
  • Patients with known central nervous system metastasis or history of central nervous system metastasis before screening. For patients with suspected central nervous system metastasis, CT or MRI examination must be performed within 14 days before randomization to exclude central nervous system metastasis.
  • Patients with high blood pressure and single step-down medications were not able to obtain good control (systolic blood pressure was more than 140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure was more than 90 mmHg); patients with a history of unstable angina; a new diagnosis within 3 months before screening was an event of myocardial infarction within 6 months before or after screening; Arrhythmias (including QTCF: male,450 ms, female, 470ms) require long-term use of anti-arrhythmic drugs and the New York Heart Association rating of grade ii cardiac insufficiency;
  • Long-term unhealed wounds or incomplete fractures,
  • Imaging showed that the tumor had invaded the perivascular area of important vessels or was judged by researchers that the tumor was highly likely to invade important blood vessels during treatment, resulting in fatal massive bleeding.
  • Patients with abnormal coagulation function and bleeding tendency (14 days before randomization must be satisfied:INR is within the normal range without anticoagulant); Patients treated with anticoagulant or vitamin k antagonists such as warfarin, heparin or its analogues; Low dose warfarin (1mg oral, once a day) or low dose aspirin (not exceeding 100 mg); per day) is allowed for prophylactic purposes on the premise that the international standardized ratio of prothrombin time (INR) was less than 1.5;
  • Hyperarteriovenous thrombosis occurred within 6 months before screening, such as cerebrovascular accidents (including temporary ischemic seizures), Deep venous thrombosis (except where venous thrombosis caused by intravenous catheterization after pre-chemotherapy has been cured by researchers) and pulmonary embolism, etc.
  • There was abnormal thyroid function in the past, and even in the case of drug treatment, thyroid function could not be maintained within the normal range;
  • Having a history of psychotropic substance abuse and unable to give up or have mental disorders.
  • Radiotherapy for abdominal tumors has been carried out in the past.
  • Have a history of immunodeficiency, or suffer from other acquired, congenital immunodeficiency diseases, or have a history of organ transplantation.
  • According to the researchers' judgment, there are serious diseases that endanger the safety of patients or affect the completion of the study.
Sex/Gender  ICMJE
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
Ages  ICMJE 18 Years to 80 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers  ICMJE No
Contacts  ICMJE
Contact: Junjie U Wang, MD +8682264910 ext +8682264910 junjiewang_edu@sina.cn
Contact: Fei U Xu, M Med +8618511866032 ext +8682264910 xufeibysy@163.com
Listed Location Countries  ICMJE China
Removed Location Countries  
 
Administrative Information
NCT Number  ICMJE NCT03963726
Other Study ID Numbers  ICMJE BYSY-CKMA-LM
Has Data Monitoring Committee No
U.S. FDA-regulated Product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.: Yes
IPD Sharing Statement  ICMJE
Plan to Share IPD: No
Responsible Party Peking University Third Hospital
Study Sponsor  ICMJE Peking University Third Hospital
Collaborators  ICMJE
  • Beijing 302 Hospital
  • Tengzhou Central People's Hospital
  • Guangxi Ruikang Hospital
  • Hunan Aerospace Hospital
  • Beijing Ditan Hospital
Investigators  ICMJE
Study Chair: Junjie U Wang, MD Peking University Third Hospital
Study Director: Fei U Xu, M Med Peking University Third Hospital
Principal Investigator: Xuezhang Duan, MD Beijing 302 Hospital
Principal Investigator: Kaixian Zhang, MD Tengzhou Central People's Hospital
Principal Investigator: Wei Li, MD Beijing Ditan Hospital
Principal Investigator: Hui Xie, MD Beijing 302 Hospital
Principal Investigator: Zuping Lian, MD Guangxi Ruikang Hospital
Principal Investigator: Xian Xu, M Med Hunan Aerospace Hospital
Principal Investigator: Fuxin Guo, MD Peking University Third Hospital
Principal Investigator: Jing Sun, M Med Beijing 302 Hospital
PRS Account Peking University Third Hospital
Verification Date May 2019

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP

治疗医院