• Line bisection Test [ Time Frame: Change from baseline (T0) to 7 days (pre-treatment baseline, T1) and from T1 to immediately after 7 days of therapy (T2) ]
  Test for spatial inattention which measures spatial biases when marking middle of 10 20mm lines. Bisection error bigger that 6mm is considered evidence of spatial inattention.
• Broken Hearts test from Oxford Cognitive Screening (paper version) [ Time Frame: Change from baseline (T0) to 7 days (pre-treatment baseline, T1) and from T1 to immediately after 7 days of therapy (T2) ]
  Standardized measure of spatial inattention
• Computerized extrapersonal neglect test (CENT) [ Time Frame: Change from baseline (T0) to 7 days (pre-treatment baseline, T1) and from T1 to immediately after 7 days of therapy (T2) ]
  Computerized test measuring ego and allocentric neglect sub types in extra personal space via television screen
• Catherine Bergego Scale [ Time Frame: Change from baseline (T0) to 7 days (pre-treatment baseline, T1) and from T1 to immediately after 7 days of therapy (T2) ]
  Standardized checklist to detect presence and degree of unilateral neglect during observation of everyday life situations. The scale also measures self-awareness of behavioral neglect (anosognosia). The CBS uses a 4-point rating scale to indicate the severity of neglect for each item: 0 = no neglect

  1. = mild neglect (patient always explores the right hemispace first and slowly or hesitantly explores the left side)
  2. = moderate neglect (patient demonstrates constant and clear left-sided omissions or collisions)
  3. = severe neglect (patient is only able to explore the right hemispace)

  This results in a total score out of 30. Azouvi et al. (2002, 2003) have reported arbitrary ratings of neglect severity according to total scores: 0 = No behavioral neglect 1-10 = Mild behavioral neglect 11-20 = Moderate behavioral neglect 21-30 = Severe behavioral neglect
• Pinch and grip force task (dynamometer) [ Time Frame: Change from baseline (T0) to 7 days (pre-treatment baseline, T1) and from T1 to immediately after 7 days of therapy (T2) ]
  Measures upper limb function
• Caregiver Burden Scale [ Time Frame: Change from baseline (T0) to 7 days (pre-treatment baseline, T1) and from T1 to immediately after 7 days of therapy (T2) ]
  To assess perceived burden among people caring for others with disabilities. There are 22 items in which the carer rates perceived burden from 0 (never) to 4 (nearly always). A total score of 0 to 20 = little or no burden; 21 to 40 = mild to moderate burden; 41 to 60 = moderate to severe burden; 61 to 88 = severe burden.
• Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL) [ Time Frame: Change from baseline (T0) to 7 days (pre-treatment baseline, T1) and from T1 to immediately after 7 days of therapy (T2) ]
  A patient-centered outcome measure intended to provide an assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) specific to patients with stroke. Patients must respond to each question of the SS-QOL with reference to the past week. It is a self-report scale containing 49 items in 12 domains. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate better functioning. The SS-QOL yields both domain scores and an overall SS-QOL summary score. The domain scores are unweighted averages of the associated items while the summary score is an unweighted average of all twelve domain scores.

• System Usability Scale [ Time Frame: immediately after 7 days of therapy (T2) ]
  To assess usability of devices and applications. Participants are asked to score the following 10 items with one of five responses that range from Strongly Agree to Strongly disagree. The participant's scores for each question are converted to a new number, added together and then multiplied by 2.5 to convert the original scores of 0-40 to 0-100. Though the scores are 0-100, these are not percentages and should be considered only in terms of their percentile ranking. Based on research, a SUS score above a 68 would be considered above average and anything below 68 is below average.
• Semi-structured interview at end of study with carer and stroke survivor [ Time Frame: immediately after 7 days of therapy (T2) ]
  To assess usability (qualitative data)
• WAIS Digit span (control measure) [ Time Frame: Change from baseline (T0) to 7 days (pre-treatment baseline, T1) and from T1 to immediately after 7 days of therapy (T2) ]
  Digit span from WAIS (forward, backward and sequential) is used as a control task

• System Usability Scale [ Time Frame: immediately after 7 days of therapy (T2) ]
  To assess usability of devices and applications. Participants are asked to score the following 10 items with one of five responses that range from Strongly Agree to Strongly disagree. The participant's scores for each question are converted to a new number, added together and then multiplied by 2.5 to convert the original scores of 0-40 to 0-100. Though the scores are 0-100, these are not percentages and should be considered only in terms of their percentile ranking. Based on research, a SUS score above a 68 would be considered above average and anything below 68 is below average.
• Semi-structured interview at end of study with carer and stroke survivor [ Time Frame: immediately after 7 days of therapy (T2) ]
  To assess usability (qualitative data)

• Stroke
• Brain Injuries
• Spatial Neglect
• Attention Deficit

Inclusion Criteria:

• +18
• suffered brain injury
• have TV with around 2 meters in front of it to be able to run the therapy
• live in the Norfolk, Suffolk, Essex or Cambridgeshire (UK)
• no other pre-existing neurological disorders (such as dementia)
• no language impairment (able to follow 1-stage command)
• mental capacity to consent
• no known learning disability
• no major psychiatric illness
• no history of substance abuse