Induction of anesthesia and the knee-chest position are associated with hemodynamic changes that may impact patient outcomes.
Changes from baseline in cardiac output and other hemodynamic variables following induction of anesthesia and knee-chest positioning were compared. Propofol plasma concentrations were also measured after induction of anesthesia and after the knee-chest position.
The aim of this study was to assess whether planned reductions in target-controlled infusion propofol concentrations attenuate the hemodynamic changes associated with anesthesia induction and knee-chest position.
The secondary aim was to quantify the variation in propofol measured plasma concentrations (Cm), both after induction and after KC positioning, and correlate them with predicted concentrations (Cp) by the Schnider Pk model.
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Hemodynamic Instability Anesthesia Surgery | Drug: Propofol reduction | Not Applicable |
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Actual Enrollment : | 20 participants |
| Allocation: | Non-Randomized |
| Intervention Model: | Sequential Assignment |
| Intervention Model Description: | In phase 1, target-controlled infusion propofol anesthesia was adjusted to maintain BIS 40 to 60. In phase 2, there were 2 planned reductions in propofol target concentration: (1) immediately after loss of consciousness - reduction calculated using a predefined formula, and (2) before positioning - reduction equal to the average percentage decrease in CO after knee-chest position in phase 1. |
| Masking: | None (Open Label) |
| Primary Purpose: | Prevention |
| Official Title: | Relationship Between Hemodynamic Changes and Propofol Pharmacokinetic Variation During Anesthesia Induction and Knee-chest Positioning in Propofol TCI Guided Anesthesia |
| Actual Study Start Date : | July 2009 |
| Actual Primary Completion Date : | January 2014 |
| Actual Study Completion Date : | January 2014 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: No protocolled propofol reduction
In phase 1, target-controlled infusion propofol anesthesia was adjusted to maintain BIS 40 to 60.
|
|
|
Experimental: Two protocolled propofol reductions
In phase 2, there were 2 planned reductions in propofol target concentration: (1) immediately after loss of consciousness-reduction calculated using a predefined formula, and (2) before positioning-reduction equal to the average percentage decrease in CO after knee-chest position in phase
|
Drug: Propofol reduction
Reduction of propofol target concentration
|
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
• Lumbar spinal condition for surgical treatment in knee-chest position
Exclusion Criteria:
| Portugal | |
| Centro Hospitalar do Porto | |
| Porto, Portugal | |
| Study Director: | Consuelo S Sanchez, PhD | University of Salamanca, Faculty of Medicine |
| Tracking Information | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Submitted Date ICMJE | May 11, 2019 | ||||||||||||
| First Posted Date ICMJE | May 23, 2019 | ||||||||||||
| Last Update Posted Date | May 23, 2019 | ||||||||||||
| Actual Study Start Date ICMJE | July 2009 | ||||||||||||
| Actual Primary Completion Date | January 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Hemodynamic changes [ Time Frame: Baseline (moment 0), 10 minutes after induction of anesthesia (moment 1), 10 minutes after knee-chest positioning (moment 2) ] Changes from baseline in cardiac output and comparison of the changes between both groups.
|
||||||||||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||||||
| Change History | No Changes Posted | ||||||||||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Pharmacokinetic changes [ Time Frame: Baseline (moment 0), 10 minutes after induction of anesthesia (moment 1), 10 minutes after knee-chest positioning (moment 2) ] Correlation between propofol measured plasma concentrations and predicted plasma concentrations (Cp) by the Schnider Pk model.
|
||||||||||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||||||
| Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||||||||||
| Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||||||||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||||||||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Hemodynamic Changes and Propofol Pharmacokinetic Variation During Anesthesia Induction and Knee-chest Positioning | ||||||||||||
| Official Title ICMJE | Relationship Between Hemodynamic Changes and Propofol Pharmacokinetic Variation During Anesthesia Induction and Knee-chest Positioning in Propofol TCI Guided Anesthesia | ||||||||||||
| Brief Summary |
Induction of anesthesia and the knee-chest position are associated with hemodynamic changes that may impact patient outcomes. Changes from baseline in cardiac output and other hemodynamic variables following induction of anesthesia and knee-chest positioning were compared. Propofol plasma concentrations were also measured after induction of anesthesia and after the knee-chest position. The aim of this study was to assess whether planned reductions in target-controlled infusion propofol concentrations attenuate the hemodynamic changes associated with anesthesia induction and knee-chest position. The secondary aim was to quantify the variation in propofol measured plasma concentrations (Cm), both after induction and after KC positioning, and correlate them with predicted concentrations (Cp) by the Schnider Pk model. |
||||||||||||
| Detailed Description | A total of 20 patients scheduled for elective lumbar spinal surgery in the knee-chest position were included. In addition to standard anesthesia monitoring, bispectral index and noninvasive cardiac output monitoring were undertaken. The study was carried out in 2 parts. In phase 1, target-controlled infusion propofol anesthesia was adjusted to maintain BIS 40 to 60. In phase 2, there were 2 planned reductions in propofol target concentration: (1) immediately after loss of consciousness: reduction calculated using a predefined formula, and (2) before positioning: reduction equal to the average percentage decrease in CO after knee-chest position in phase 1. | ||||||||||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||||||||||
| Study Phase ICMJE | Not Applicable | ||||||||||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Non-Randomized Intervention Model: Sequential Assignment Intervention Model Description: In phase 1, target-controlled infusion propofol anesthesia was adjusted to maintain BIS 40 to 60. In phase 2, there were 2 planned reductions in propofol target concentration: (1) immediately after loss of consciousness - reduction calculated using a predefined formula, and (2) before positioning - reduction equal to the average percentage decrease in CO after knee-chest position in phase 1. Primary Purpose: Prevention |
||||||||||||
| Condition ICMJE |
|
||||||||||||
| Intervention ICMJE | Drug: Propofol reduction
Reduction of propofol target concentration
|
||||||||||||
| Study Arms ICMJE |
|
||||||||||||
| Publications * | Not Provided | ||||||||||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||||||||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||||||||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed | ||||||||||||
| Actual Enrollment ICMJE |
20 | ||||||||||||
| Original Actual Enrollment ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||||||
| Actual Study Completion Date ICMJE | January 2014 | ||||||||||||
| Actual Primary Completion Date | January 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE |
Inclusion Criteria: • Lumbar spinal condition for surgical treatment in knee-chest position Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||||||||||
| Sex/Gender ICMJE |
|
||||||||||||
| Ages ICMJE | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) | ||||||||||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE | Yes | ||||||||||||
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||||||||||
| Listed Location Countries ICMJE | Portugal | ||||||||||||
| Removed Location Countries | |||||||||||||
| Administrative Information | |||||||||||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT03961958 | ||||||||||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | USalamanca | ||||||||||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | Not Provided | ||||||||||||
| U.S. FDA-regulated Product |
|
||||||||||||
| IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE |
|
||||||||||||
| Responsible Party | Daniela Chalo, University of Salamanca | ||||||||||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | University of Salamanca | ||||||||||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Centro Hospitalar do Porto | ||||||||||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||||||||||
| PRS Account | University of Salamanca | ||||||||||||
| Verification Date | May 2019 | ||||||||||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||||||||||