Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Anesthesia | Drug: Chirocaine %0.5 Drug: Chirocaine Heavy 40 Drug: Chirocaine Heavy 60 Drug: Chirocaine Heavy 80 | Phase 4 |
Patients scheduled for elective caesarean delivery were separated into 4 groups. Spinal anesthesia was performed with one of the following regimens.
Group 1: Levobupivacaine 8 mg + 20 mcg Fentanyl Group 2: Levobupivacaine 8 mg + 20 mcg Fentanyl + 40 mg Dextrose Group 3: Levobupivacaine 8 mg + 20 mcg Fentanyl + 60 mg Dextrose Group 4: Levobupivacaine 8 mg + 20 mcg Fentanyl + 80 mg Dextrose After anesthesia induction motor block was evaluated via bromage scale and sensory block via pinprick test every 3 minutes for the first 15 minutes, and every 5 minutes up to 60 minutes. Maximum sensory block level, time to reach maximum block level, time needed to achieve T10 sensory level were recorded.
Baby delivery time, and operation duration were also recorded. Time to two segment regression of maximum sensory block, motor block recovery time and time to S2 regression of sensory block will be recorded.
Hemodynamic data, nausea vomiting, were also recorded throughout surgery at the same evaluation periods and postoperative period.
The surgeon will also evaluate the abdominal relaxation surgical block quality as good, medium and poor.
The patient will evaluate spinal block analgesia quality as good, medium or poor.
Pain scores are going to be evaluated by VAS at the beginning, uterine incision and during abdominal closure. Time for first analgesic requirement and postoperative pain is also going to be evaluated by VAS.
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Actual Enrollment : | 100 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) |
Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
Official Title: | Comparison of the Efficacy of 3 Different Density Levobupivacaine Solutions + Fentanyl Applied Intrathecally for Spinal Anesthesia in Caesarean Delivery. |
Study Start Date : | June 2014 |
Actual Primary Completion Date : | June 2016 |
Actual Study Completion Date : | August 2016 |
Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Plain Levobupivacaine (Chirocaine (% 0.5)
Levobupivacaine 8 mg (Chirocaine (% 0.5)) + 20 mcg fentanyl Chirocaine Plain
|
Drug: Chirocaine %0.5
Levobupivacaine 8 mg Chirocaine (% 0.5) +20 mcg fentanyl
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Levobupivacaine (Chirocaine % 0,75) + dextrose 40
Levobupivacaine 8 mg (Chirocaine % 0,75) + 20 mcg fentanyl + dextrose 40 Chirocaine Heavy 40
|
Drug: Chirocaine Heavy 40
Chirocaine (%0.75) + Dextrose 40 mg+20 mcg fentanyl
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Levobupivacaine (Chirocaine % 0,75) + dextrose 60
Levobupivacaine 8 mg (Chirocaine % 0,75) + 20 mcg fentanyl + dextrose 60 Chirocaine Heavy 60
|
Drug: Chirocaine Heavy 60
Chirocaine (%0.75) + Dextrose 60 mg+20 mcg fentanyl
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Levobupivacaine (Chirocaine % 0,75) + dextrose 80
Levobupivacaine 8 mg (Chirocaine % 0,75) + 20 mcg fentanyl + dextrose 80 Chirocaine Heavy 80
|
Drug: Chirocaine Heavy 80
Chirocaine (%0.75) + Dextrose 80 mg+20 mcg fentanyl
Other Names:
|
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 45 Years (Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | Female |
Gender Based Eligibility: | Yes |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Study Director: | Ozlem Sagir, Assist. Prof | Balikesir University School of Medicine Department of Anesthesia and Reanimation |
Tracking Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date ICMJE | May 14, 2019 | ||||
First Posted Date ICMJE | May 20, 2019 | ||||
Last Update Posted Date | May 20, 2019 | ||||
Study Start Date ICMJE | June 2014 | ||||
Actual Primary Completion Date | June 2016 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||
Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
Change History | No Changes Posted | ||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||
Descriptive Information | |||||
Brief Title ICMJE | Comparison of 3 Different Density Levobupivacaine Solutions + Fentanyl for Spinal Anaesthesia for Caesarean Delivery. | ||||
Official Title ICMJE | Comparison of the Efficacy of 3 Different Density Levobupivacaine Solutions + Fentanyl Applied Intrathecally for Spinal Anesthesia in Caesarean Delivery. | ||||
Brief Summary | The investigator's aim is to compare the efficacy of 3 levobupivacaine solutions with different density on spinal anesthesia for caesarean delivery. | ||||
Detailed Description |
Patients scheduled for elective caesarean delivery were separated into 4 groups. Spinal anesthesia was performed with one of the following regimens. Group 1: Levobupivacaine 8 mg + 20 mcg Fentanyl Group 2: Levobupivacaine 8 mg + 20 mcg Fentanyl + 40 mg Dextrose Group 3: Levobupivacaine 8 mg + 20 mcg Fentanyl + 60 mg Dextrose Group 4: Levobupivacaine 8 mg + 20 mcg Fentanyl + 80 mg Dextrose After anesthesia induction motor block was evaluated via bromage scale and sensory block via pinprick test every 3 minutes for the first 15 minutes, and every 5 minutes up to 60 minutes. Maximum sensory block level, time to reach maximum block level, time needed to achieve T10 sensory level were recorded. Baby delivery time, and operation duration were also recorded. Time to two segment regression of maximum sensory block, motor block recovery time and time to S2 regression of sensory block will be recorded. Hemodynamic data, nausea vomiting, were also recorded throughout surgery at the same evaluation periods and postoperative period. The surgeon will also evaluate the abdominal relaxation surgical block quality as good, medium and poor. The patient will evaluate spinal block analgesia quality as good, medium or poor. Pain scores are going to be evaluated by VAS at the beginning, uterine incision and during abdominal closure. Time for first analgesic requirement and postoperative pain is also going to be evaluated by VAS. |
||||
Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
Study Phase ICMJE | Phase 4 | ||||
Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
||||
Condition ICMJE | Anesthesia | ||||
Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||
Study Arms ICMJE |
|
||||
Publications * | Not Provided | ||||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
Recruitment Information | |||||
Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed | ||||
Actual Enrollment ICMJE |
100 | ||||
Original Actual Enrollment ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
Actual Study Completion Date ICMJE | August 2016 | ||||
Actual Primary Completion Date | June 2016 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Eligibility Criteria ICMJE |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
Sex/Gender ICMJE |
|
||||
Ages ICMJE | 18 Years to 45 Years (Adult) | ||||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE | Yes | ||||
Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||
Listed Location Countries ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
Removed Location Countries | |||||
Administrative Information | |||||
NCT Number ICMJE | NCT03956303 | ||||
Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | osagir2 | ||||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product | Not Provided | ||||
IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
Responsible Party | Ozlem Sagir, MD, Balikesir University | ||||
Study Sponsor ICMJE | Balikesir University | ||||
Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
PRS Account | Balikesir University | ||||
Verification Date | May 2019 | ||||
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |