Condition or disease |
---|
Postoperative Delirium Aortic Valve Stenosis |
Study Type : | Observational |
Actual Enrollment : | 250 participants |
Observational Model: | Cohort |
Time Perspective: | Prospective |
Official Title: | Assessing the Incidence of Postoperative Delirium Following Aortic Valve Surgery |
Actual Study Start Date : | September 23, 2018 |
Actual Primary Completion Date : | January 20, 2020 |
Actual Study Completion Date : | July 9, 2020 |
Ages Eligible for Study: | 70 Years and older (Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Sampling Method: | Probability Sample |
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients scheduled to undergo elective
Exclusion Criteria:
Belgium | |
University Hospitals Leuven | |
Leuven, Belgium, 3000 |
Principal Investigator: | Danny Hoogma, MD | Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven |
Tracking Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date | May 8, 2019 | ||||
First Posted Date | May 15, 2019 | ||||
Last Update Posted Date | January 19, 2021 | ||||
Actual Study Start Date | September 23, 2018 | ||||
Actual Primary Completion Date | January 20, 2020 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Current Primary Outcome Measures |
Incidence of postoperative delirium [ Time Frame: During the first five postoperative days or until discharge, in case of POD followup until resolution of POD or discharge. ] Using the 3-minute Diagnostic confusion assessment method (3D-CAM), the derived version for intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) or nurse reports combined with interview with the caregivers and patient
|
||||
Original Primary Outcome Measures |
Incidence of postoperative delirium [ Time Frame: During the first five postoperative days or until discharge, in case of POD followup until resolution of POD or discharge. ] Using the 3-minute Diagnostic confusion assessment method (3D-CAM) or the derived version for intensive care unit (CAM-ICU)
|
||||
Change History | |||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures |
|
||||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures |
|
||||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures |
|
||||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Same as current | ||||
Descriptive Information | |||||
Brief Title | Assessing the Incidence of Postoperative Delirium Following Aortic Valve Replacement | ||||
Official Title | Assessing the Incidence of Postoperative Delirium Following Aortic Valve Surgery | ||||
Brief Summary | Our primary aim in this observational study is to identify the incidence of POD in the first five postoperative days by using the 3-minute Diagnostic confusion assessment method (3D-CAM), the derived version for intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) or nurse reports in patients undergoing different techniques of aortic valve replacement. Patients are followed 5 days postoperative with the 3D-CAM or until resolution of POD. Six months postoperatively, a follow-up by phone is planned for activity of daily living (ADL). | ||||
Detailed Description | A significant and often underrecognized complication after surgery is postoperative delirium (POD) causing increased morbidity and mortality. This is especially true for the older cardiac surgical patient, in whom the incidence of POD is up to 70%. Surgical invasiveness and herewith related inflammation, a cholinergic load of medications, postoperative pain or use of opioids are examples of precipitating factors that can be altered to reduce the incidence of POD. Transaortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a revolutionary technique that has led to a dramatic decrease in surgical invasiveness and improved outcomes in high-risk surgical patients. However, only a few studies evaluated neurocognitive outcome after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) compared to TAVR, suggesting a reduced incidence of POD with TAVR compared to SAVR. In contrast, other studies found almost no difference in POD in the aforementioned patient groups. Hence, it remains still unclear which technique best to use in patients at high risk for POD. | ||||
Study Type | Observational | ||||
Study Design | Observational Model: Cohort Time Perspective: Prospective |
||||
Target Follow-Up Duration | Not Provided | ||||
Biospecimen | Retention: Samples Without DNA Description:
presence of neural injury markers
|
||||
Sampling Method | Probability Sample | ||||
Study Population | Any patient presenting for the indicated surgery in a tertiary university hospital | ||||
Condition |
|
||||
Intervention | Not Provided | ||||
Study Groups/Cohorts | Not Provided | ||||
Publications * | Not Provided | ||||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
Recruitment Information | |||||
Recruitment Status | Completed | ||||
Actual Enrollment |
250 | ||||
Original Estimated Enrollment | Same as current | ||||
Actual Study Completion Date | July 9, 2020 | ||||
Actual Primary Completion Date | January 20, 2020 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Eligibility Criteria |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
Sex/Gender |
|
||||
Ages | 70 Years and older (Older Adult) | ||||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||
Contacts | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||
Listed Location Countries | Belgium | ||||
Removed Location Countries | |||||
Administrative Information | |||||
NCT Number | NCT03950440 | ||||
Other Study ID Numbers | S61710 | ||||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes | ||||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product |
|
||||
IPD Sharing Statement |
|
||||
Responsible Party | dr. Danny Hoogma, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven | ||||
Study Sponsor | Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven | ||||
Collaborators | Not Provided | ||||
Investigators |
|
||||
PRS Account | Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven | ||||
Verification Date | January 2021 |