Melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer and its incidence has doubled every 20 years in France, where this cancer is responsible of more than 1600 deaths each year.
Patients with early diagnosis have good prognosis and can be generally cured by surgery only. Advanced melanoma however has a very bad prognosis.
Loco-regional lymph nodes are usually the first distant localization in metastatic melanoma. Lymph node dissection is then the recommended treatment, although it's impact on survival has never been proven.
In the same way, the benefit risk profile of interferon as adjuvant treatment after lymph node dissection is still much debated.
Recently, new treatments either with immunotherapy (ipilimumab, nivolumab) or by the targeted therapy dabrafenib/trametinib in patients with BRAF mutation have shown an impact on survival in the adjuvant setting after lymph node dissection.
But, it has not yet been established if this strategy has a benefit gain compared to starting those treatments only in the metastatic setting after watchful follow-up.
Moreover, if these novel therapies (targeted therapies: TT, immunotherapies : IT) demonstrated for the first time a real benefit in terms of survival or of responses rates in melanoma, physicians and patients had to address new problems, such as the management of unusual adverse events.
Partial and dissociated responses can also be seen with those new treatments. Some patients will have complete response in some lesions, stabilization in others and progression in a few. It is to be expected that one of the real key points of this therapy is to be found here, as this situation is commonly seen, and it would probably be a poor choice to stop a treatment that is globally effective for progression of only 1 or 2 lesions, in a patient otherwise stabilized.
That is the context in which interventional radiology (IR) should be considered as an extremely efficient option. IR is a real medical revolution in the last 2 decades.
It provides not only the opportunity to determine the characteristics of residual lesion (fibrosis, necrosis, metastasis, or sarcoidosis,…) by biopsy, but allows also their targeted destruction through different technics (cryotherapy, radiofrequency, laser,…).
The investigators are fortunate to have in their institution one of the best IR department of the world (headed by Prof. Afshin GANGI), with a technical platform unique in Europe that allows IR through ultrasound, scan, petscan and MRI.
To the best of their knowledge, Immunotherapy associated with IR has not been performed so far.
This association could in theory:
That's why the investigators are willing to conduct this pilot project, the objectives of which are:
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Melanoma (Skin) | Drug: Nivolumab 10 MG/ML Intravenous Solution [OPDIVO] Procedure: Cryotherapy Drug: Ipilimumab Injection | Phase 1 Phase 2 |
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Estimated Enrollment : | 25 participants |
Allocation: | N/A |
Intervention Model: | Single Group Assignment |
Masking: | None (Open Label) |
Primary Purpose: | Other |
Official Title: | Cryotherapy Under Interventional Radiology Combined With in Situ Ipilimumab and a Flat Dose of Nivolumab in Stage IIIB/C Melanoma. Prospective Proof of Concept Study. |
Actual Study Start Date : | August 16, 2019 |
Estimated Primary Completion Date : | February 2022 |
Estimated Study Completion Date : | October 2022 |
Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Experimental arm
Single Nivolumab 240 mg infusion at D0, followed by cryotherapy using interventional radiology of metastatic lymphadenopathy at D1 and in situ injection with ipilimumab at D2.
|
Drug: Nivolumab 10 MG/ML Intravenous Solution [OPDIVO]
Single Nivolumab 240 mg infusion at D0
Procedure: Cryotherapy Cryotherapy using interventional radiology of metastatic lymphadenopathy at D1
Drug: Ipilimumab Injection In situ injection with ipilimumab at D2.
|
Number of failures linked to the procedure, from all causes (unless the patient changes his/her mind = withdrawal from the study). In the context of this study, failure is defined as follows:
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Patient presenting with an active, known or suspected autoimmune disease. The following, however, may participate:
Contact: Dan LIPSKER, MD PhD | +33 3 88 11 61 79 | dan.lipsker@chru-strasbourg.fr |
France | |
Clinique Dermatologique/Radiologie Interventionnelle/Urologie/Gynécologie-Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg | Recruiting |
Strasbourg, France, 67091 | |
Contact: Dan LIPSKER, MD, PhD +33 3 88 11 61 79 dan.lipsker@chru-strasbourg.fr | |
Sub-Investigator: Cédric LENORMAND | |
Sub-Investigator: Jean-Nicolas SCRIVENER | |
Sub-Investigator: Afshin GANGI | |
Sub-Investigator: Julien GARNON | |
Sub-Investigator: Jean CAUDRELIER | |
Sub-Investigator: Roberto Luigi CAZATTO | |
Sub-Investigator: Pierre AULOGE | |
Sub-Investigator: Guillaume KOCH | |
Sub-Investigator: Alice KIENY | |
Sub-Investigator: Hervé LANG | |
Sub-Investigator: Mousselim GHARBI | |
Principal Investigator: Dan LIPSKER | |
Sub-Investigator: Antoine BRAUD |
Principal Investigator: | Dan LIPSKER, MD PhD | Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg |
Tracking Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date ICMJE | April 11, 2019 | ||||
First Posted Date ICMJE | May 14, 2019 | ||||
Last Update Posted Date | April 13, 2021 | ||||
Actual Study Start Date ICMJE | August 16, 2019 | ||||
Estimated Primary Completion Date | February 2022 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Number of failures linked to the procedure [ Time Frame: Day 1 (cryoablation) or Day 2 (ipilimumab injection) ] Number of failures linked to the procedure, from all causes (unless the patient changes his/her mind = withdrawal from the study). In the context of this study, failure is defined as follows:
|
||||
Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
Change History | |||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||
Descriptive Information | |||||
Brief Title ICMJE | Cryotherapy With in Situ Immunotherapy in Melanoma Metastasis | ||||
Official Title ICMJE | Cryotherapy Under Interventional Radiology Combined With in Situ Ipilimumab and a Flat Dose of Nivolumab in Stage IIIB/C Melanoma. Prospective Proof of Concept Study. | ||||
Brief Summary |
Melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer and its incidence has doubled every 20 years in France, where this cancer is responsible of more than 1600 deaths each year. Patients with early diagnosis have good prognosis and can be generally cured by surgery only. Advanced melanoma however has a very bad prognosis. Loco-regional lymph nodes are usually the first distant localization in metastatic melanoma. Lymph node dissection is then the recommended treatment, although it's impact on survival has never been proven. In the same way, the benefit risk profile of interferon as adjuvant treatment after lymph node dissection is still much debated. Recently, new treatments either with immunotherapy (ipilimumab, nivolumab) or by the targeted therapy dabrafenib/trametinib in patients with BRAF mutation have shown an impact on survival in the adjuvant setting after lymph node dissection. But, it has not yet been established if this strategy has a benefit gain compared to starting those treatments only in the metastatic setting after watchful follow-up. Moreover, if these novel therapies (targeted therapies: TT, immunotherapies : IT) demonstrated for the first time a real benefit in terms of survival or of responses rates in melanoma, physicians and patients had to address new problems, such as the management of unusual adverse events. Partial and dissociated responses can also be seen with those new treatments. Some patients will have complete response in some lesions, stabilization in others and progression in a few. It is to be expected that one of the real key points of this therapy is to be found here, as this situation is commonly seen, and it would probably be a poor choice to stop a treatment that is globally effective for progression of only 1 or 2 lesions, in a patient otherwise stabilized. That is the context in which interventional radiology (IR) should be considered as an extremely efficient option. IR is a real medical revolution in the last 2 decades. It provides not only the opportunity to determine the characteristics of residual lesion (fibrosis, necrosis, metastasis, or sarcoidosis,…) by biopsy, but allows also their targeted destruction through different technics (cryotherapy, radiofrequency, laser,…). The investigators are fortunate to have in their institution one of the best IR department of the world (headed by Prof. Afshin GANGI), with a technical platform unique in Europe that allows IR through ultrasound, scan, petscan and MRI. To the best of their knowledge, Immunotherapy associated with IR has not been performed so far. This association could in theory:
That's why the investigators are willing to conduct this pilot project, the objectives of which are:
|
||||
Detailed Description | Not Provided | ||||
Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
Study Phase ICMJE | Phase 1 Phase 2 |
||||
Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: N/A Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: None (Open Label) Primary Purpose: Other |
||||
Condition ICMJE | Melanoma (Skin) | ||||
Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||
Study Arms ICMJE | Experimental: Experimental arm
Single Nivolumab 240 mg infusion at D0, followed by cryotherapy using interventional radiology of metastatic lymphadenopathy at D1 and in situ injection with ipilimumab at D2.
Interventions:
|
||||
Publications * | Not Provided | ||||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
Recruitment Information | |||||
Recruitment Status ICMJE | Recruiting | ||||
Estimated Enrollment ICMJE |
25 | ||||
Original Estimated Enrollment ICMJE |
15 | ||||
Estimated Study Completion Date ICMJE | October 2022 | ||||
Estimated Primary Completion Date | February 2022 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Eligibility Criteria ICMJE |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
Sex/Gender ICMJE |
|
||||
Ages ICMJE | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) | ||||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE | No | ||||
Contacts ICMJE |
|
||||
Listed Location Countries ICMJE | France | ||||
Removed Location Countries | |||||
Administrative Information | |||||
NCT Number ICMJE | NCT03949153 | ||||
Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | 7102 | ||||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes | ||||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product |
|
||||
IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE |
|
||||
Responsible Party | University Hospital, Strasbourg, France | ||||
Study Sponsor ICMJE | University Hospital, Strasbourg, France | ||||
Collaborators ICMJE | Bristol-Myers Squibb | ||||
Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
PRS Account | University Hospital, Strasbourg, France | ||||
Verification Date | April 2021 | ||||
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |