This is a 2-arm, prospective, randomized (2:1 ratio), open-label, multi-centre, phase II study conducted in patients affected by unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer receiving niraparib plus best supportive care versus best supportive care as maintenance therapy after a first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.
The primary objective of the trial is to evaluate the efficacy of niraparib plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) vs. BSC alone, as maintenance treatment, in terms of prolongation of progression-free survival (PFS), in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer that obtained disease control (objective response or stable disease) with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Urothelial Carcinoma | Drug: Niraparib Other: Best supportive care | Phase 2 |
This is a 2-arm, prospective, randomized (2:1 ratio), open-label, multi-centre, phase II study conducted in patients affected by unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer receiving niraparib plus best supportive care versus best supportive care as maintenance therapy after a first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.
The primary objective of the trial is to evaluate the efficacy of niraparib plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) vs. BSC alone, as maintenance treatment, in terms of prolongation of progression-free survival (PFS), in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer that obtained disease control (objective response or stable disease) with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.
Poly-adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors sensitivity is based on the presence of truncating and missense mutations in genes associated with the homologous recombination pathways. In The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset approximately 34% of bladder urothelial carcinoma harbored these mutations. Furthermore, in this study we plan to select a population potentially sensible to niraparib, by enrolling patients responding to platinum, indeed we know that there is a cross-sensitivity and a cross-resistance between platinum drugs and PARP inhibitors in urothelial carcinoma.
PFS is commonly adopted as primary endpoint in randomized phase II trials. Randomized design for phase II trials has been increasingly adopted in recent years, to allow a formal comparison between experimental and standard treatment. This should lead to a better interpretation of the results obtained with the experimental treatment, that are in most cases difficult to interpret in the absence of controls.
The sample size of the study is calculated with "relaxed" statistical criteria. The study design will verify if the experimental treatment (Niraparib) is promising enough to warrant a phase 3 trial for efficacy compared to observation.
A total of 65 PFS events are needed to provide 80% power to detect an hazard ratio (HR) of 0.57 (1.75), corresponding to a median increase in progression-free survival from 4 to 7 months, with one-tailed alpha 0.1.
With an accrual duration of 24 months, and additional 6 months of follow up after the completion of recruitment, 77 patient need to be randomized (26 assigned to control arm and 51 assigned to experimental arm) to obtain the 65 events needed.
Sample size of the phase II trial is too small to plan a formal analysis of interaction of treatment efficacy with type of response at first line treatment (i.e. objective response vs. stable disease). However, type of response to first line treatment will be among stratification factor for randomization, so the 2 treatment groups will be balanced. Exploratory subgroup analysis of treatment efficacy in patient who have obtained objective response with first line and in patients who have obtained stable disease with first line will be performed.
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Estimated Enrollment : | 77 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Intervention Model Description: | 2-arm, prospective, randomized (2:1 ratio), open-label, multi-centre, phase II study |
Masking: | None (Open Label) |
Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
Official Title: | A Phase II, Randomized, Trial of Niraparib Versus Best Supportive Care as Maintenance Treatment In Patients With Locally Advanced Or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer Whose Disease Did Not Progress After First-line Platinum-based Chemotherapy |
Actual Study Start Date : | August 27, 2019 |
Estimated Primary Completion Date : | December 2021 |
Estimated Study Completion Date : | June 2024 |
Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Experimental Arm
Patients assigned to experimental arm will receive Niraparib 300 mg or 200 mg daily (based on weight and platelet count) plus best supportive care (BSC), in 28-day cycles, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or death.
|
Drug: Niraparib
Niraparib will be administered as a flat-fixed, continuous daily dose: ≥77 kg and ≥150,000 µL: 300 mg (3 X 100 mg capsules) daily <77 kg or <150,000 µL: 200 mg (2 X 100 mg capsules) daily* * For patients whose starting dose is 2 capsules once daily, escalation to 3 capsules once daily will be permitted if no treatment interruption or discontinuation will be required during the first 2 cycles of therapy Other Name: Zejula
Other: Best supportive care In both treatment arms, Best Supportive Care (BSC) is defined as a comprehensive assessment of symptoms, with timely application of symptom control measures, in order to maximize patient's quality of life. BSC does not include any active antitumoral treatment, and will be given according to local guidelines and the normal practice of each participating institution. BSC will include use of opioid analgesics, other supportive drugs, radiotherapy, administered with the exclusive aim of improving tumor symptoms (e.g. pain, haematuria, etc.), according to Investigator's judgment. |
Control Arm
Patients assigned to control arm will receive best supportive care alone, until disease progression or death.
|
Other: Best supportive care
In both treatment arms, Best Supportive Care (BSC) is defined as a comprehensive assessment of symptoms, with timely application of symptom control measures, in order to maximize patient's quality of life. BSC does not include any active antitumoral treatment, and will be given according to local guidelines and the normal practice of each participating institution. BSC will include use of opioid analgesics, other supportive drugs, radiotherapy, administered with the exclusive aim of improving tumor symptoms (e.g. pain, haematuria, etc.), according to Investigator's judgment. |
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Participant must have adequate bone marrow and organ function, defined as follows:
Female participant has a negative urine or serum pregnancy test within 7 days prior to taking study treatment if of childbearing potential and agrees to abstain from activities that could result in pregnancy from screening through 180 days after the last dose of study treatment, or is of non-childbearing potential. Non-childbearing potential is defined as follows (by other than medical reasons):
Note: Abstinence is acceptable if this is the established and preferred contraception for the patient.
Exclusion Criteria:
Contact: Massimo Di Maio, MD | +390115082032 | massimo.dimaio@unito.it | |
Contact: Francesca Vignani, MD | +390115082056 | francesca.vignani@gmail.com |
Principal Investigator: | Massimo Di Maio, MD | Department of Oncology, University of Turin |
Tracking Information | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date ICMJE | May 6, 2019 | ||||||||
First Posted Date ICMJE | May 10, 2019 | ||||||||
Last Update Posted Date | October 8, 2020 | ||||||||
Actual Study Start Date ICMJE | August 27, 2019 | ||||||||
Estimated Primary Completion Date | December 2021 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||
Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Progression-free survival (PFS) [ Time Frame: Up to 3 years ] PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earlier date of assessment of progression, or death by any cause in the absence of progression. Progression will be assessed following Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria ( v.1.1 ), using investigator's review.
|
||||||||
Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||
Change History | |||||||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||||||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures |
|
||||||||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Same as current | ||||||||
Descriptive Information | |||||||||
Brief Title ICMJE | Maintenance With Niraparib In Patients With Advanced Urothelial Cancer After 1st-line Platinum-based Chemotherapy | ||||||||
Official Title ICMJE | A Phase II, Randomized, Trial of Niraparib Versus Best Supportive Care as Maintenance Treatment In Patients With Locally Advanced Or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer Whose Disease Did Not Progress After First-line Platinum-based Chemotherapy | ||||||||
Brief Summary |
This is a 2-arm, prospective, randomized (2:1 ratio), open-label, multi-centre, phase II study conducted in patients affected by unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer receiving niraparib plus best supportive care versus best supportive care as maintenance therapy after a first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary objective of the trial is to evaluate the efficacy of niraparib plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) vs. BSC alone, as maintenance treatment, in terms of prolongation of progression-free survival (PFS), in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer that obtained disease control (objective response or stable disease) with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. |
||||||||
Detailed Description |
This is a 2-arm, prospective, randomized (2:1 ratio), open-label, multi-centre, phase II study conducted in patients affected by unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer receiving niraparib plus best supportive care versus best supportive care as maintenance therapy after a first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary objective of the trial is to evaluate the efficacy of niraparib plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) vs. BSC alone, as maintenance treatment, in terms of prolongation of progression-free survival (PFS), in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer that obtained disease control (objective response or stable disease) with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Poly-adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors sensitivity is based on the presence of truncating and missense mutations in genes associated with the homologous recombination pathways. In The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset approximately 34% of bladder urothelial carcinoma harbored these mutations. Furthermore, in this study we plan to select a population potentially sensible to niraparib, by enrolling patients responding to platinum, indeed we know that there is a cross-sensitivity and a cross-resistance between platinum drugs and PARP inhibitors in urothelial carcinoma. PFS is commonly adopted as primary endpoint in randomized phase II trials. Randomized design for phase II trials has been increasingly adopted in recent years, to allow a formal comparison between experimental and standard treatment. This should lead to a better interpretation of the results obtained with the experimental treatment, that are in most cases difficult to interpret in the absence of controls. The sample size of the study is calculated with "relaxed" statistical criteria. The study design will verify if the experimental treatment (Niraparib) is promising enough to warrant a phase 3 trial for efficacy compared to observation. A total of 65 PFS events are needed to provide 80% power to detect an hazard ratio (HR) of 0.57 (1.75), corresponding to a median increase in progression-free survival from 4 to 7 months, with one-tailed alpha 0.1. With an accrual duration of 24 months, and additional 6 months of follow up after the completion of recruitment, 77 patient need to be randomized (26 assigned to control arm and 51 assigned to experimental arm) to obtain the 65 events needed. Sample size of the phase II trial is too small to plan a formal analysis of interaction of treatment efficacy with type of response at first line treatment (i.e. objective response vs. stable disease). However, type of response to first line treatment will be among stratification factor for randomization, so the 2 treatment groups will be balanced. Exploratory subgroup analysis of treatment efficacy in patient who have obtained objective response with first line and in patients who have obtained stable disease with first line will be performed. |
||||||||
Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||||||
Study Phase ICMJE | Phase 2 | ||||||||
Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Intervention Model Description: 2-arm, prospective, randomized (2:1 ratio), open-label, multi-centre, phase II study Masking: None (Open Label)Primary Purpose: Treatment |
||||||||
Condition ICMJE | Urothelial Carcinoma | ||||||||
Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||||||
Study Arms ICMJE |
|
||||||||
Publications * | Not Provided | ||||||||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||||||
Recruitment Information | |||||||||
Recruitment Status ICMJE | Recruiting | ||||||||
Estimated Enrollment ICMJE |
77 | ||||||||
Original Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||
Estimated Study Completion Date ICMJE | June 2024 | ||||||||
Estimated Primary Completion Date | December 2021 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||
Eligibility Criteria ICMJE |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||||||
Sex/Gender ICMJE |
|
||||||||
Ages ICMJE | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) | ||||||||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE | No | ||||||||
Contacts ICMJE |
|
||||||||
Listed Location Countries ICMJE | Italy | ||||||||
Removed Location Countries | |||||||||
Administrative Information | |||||||||
NCT Number ICMJE | NCT03945084 | ||||||||
Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | Meet-URO 12 | ||||||||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||||||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product |
|
||||||||
IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE |
|
||||||||
Responsible Party | Massimo Di Maio, University of Turin, Italy | ||||||||
Study Sponsor ICMJE | University of Turin, Italy | ||||||||
Collaborators ICMJE | Tesaro, Inc. | ||||||||
Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||||||
PRS Account | University of Turin, Italy | ||||||||
Verification Date | October 2020 | ||||||||
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |