Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Venous Thrombosis Catheter-Related Infections Catheter Mechanical Failure Rate | Procedure: Subclavian vein approach Procedure: internal jugular vein approach | Not Applicable |
A totally implantable venous access device (TIVAD) provides reliable, long-term vascular access and improves cancer patients' quality of life. The use of TIVADs is associated with important complications as infection and venous thrombosis, and studies have shown that several factors are associated, such as cancer types, catheter types, and the location of the catheter tips. Whether subclavian vein(SCV)or internal jugular vein(IJV) is a better site for TIVAD percutaneous access were also widely studied, and there is no definite consensus generated yet.
A meta-analysis published in 2016 by Wu et al reviewed 12 studies comparing the internal jugular vein (IJV) with the subclavian vein (SCV) as the percutaneous access site found no differences of TIVAD-related infection and catheter-related thrombotic rate. In the secondary outcome, IJV was associated with reduced risks of total major mechanical complications such as catheter dislocation and malfunction. Of 12 studies included, only 3 were randomized trial and there was no consistency between groups of using ultrasound guidance throughout TIVAD insertion. To be further, there is no description of how close to IJV-SCV junction does IJV group were inserted. Hence, a large well-designed RCT is warranted before the IJV site can be recommended.
To compare IJV and SCV as the implantation site of TIVAD and its associated thrombotic or occlusion rate, our study plans to enroll 240 patients with cancer who require central line TIVADs and randomizes them with 1:1 ratio to receive the TIVAD implantation at SCV or IJV. After the implantation, the patients will be regularly followed through phone contact and chart review for 2 years, and any symptomatic thrombosis or occlusion will be found during chemotherapy injection or regular push-pull heparin saline flush every 6 weeks as our hospital care protocol. To detect any asymptomatic thrombosis, the patients will also receive screening vascular ultrasound at 2 weeks, 2 months, and 6 months postoperatively. The study primary endpoints include any infection, asymptomatic thrombosis found by screen ultrasound, and clinically symptomatic thrombosis or occlusion and major mechanical failure/dislocation of TIVAD.
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Estimated Enrollment : | 240 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | None (Open Label) |
Primary Purpose: | Prevention |
Official Title: | A Randomized Observational Study of the Internal Jugular Vein or the Subclavian Vein Approach for Ultrasound-guided Implantation of Totally Implantable Vascular Access Device(TIVAD) |
Actual Study Start Date : | May 21, 2019 |
Estimated Primary Completion Date : | January 2024 |
Estimated Study Completion Date : | January 2024 |
Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: SCV
TIVAD implanted through subclavian vein under real-time ultrasound guidance
|
Procedure: Subclavian vein approach
Subclavian vein approach for Ultrasound-guided Implantation of TIVAD
Other Name: SCV
|
Experimental: IJV
TIVAD implanted through internal jugular vein under real-time ultrasound guidance
|
Procedure: internal jugular vein approach
internal jugular vein approach for Ultrasound-guided Implantation of TIVAD
Other Name: IJV
|
catheter-related blood stream infection(CRBSI) due to TIVAD, including:
1-1. at least one positive blood culture obtained from a peripheral vein, clinical manifestations of infections (i.e., fever, chills, and/or hypotension), and no apparent source for the blood stream infection, except the TIVAD, which leads to the TIVAD removal. Subsequent TIVAD catheter tip culture yields the same organism.
1-2. Differential time to positivity, with blood culture drawn from the TIVAD that becomes positive at least 2 hr earlier than the peripheral blood culture.
both positive symptoms and positive confirmative image tests should be met.
Positive symptom noted by the patient or caregiver, such as
Positive confirmatory image tests as
Ages Eligible for Study: | 20 Years to 99 Years (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion: 240 cancer patients, 20~99 years old.
Exclusion:
Contact: CHENG-YUAN HSIEH, MD | +886972652330 | isaac216@gmail.com | |
Contact: CHENG-YUAN HSIEH, MD | +886975386007 |
Taiwan | |
National Taiwan University Hospital | Recruiting |
Taipei, Taiwan | |
Contact: CHENG-YUAN HSIEH, MD 0972652330 isaac216@gmail.com |
Principal Investigator: | CHENG-YUAN HSIEH, MD | National Taiwan University Hospital |
Tracking Information | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date ICMJE | May 5, 2019 | ||||||||
First Posted Date ICMJE | May 10, 2019 | ||||||||
Last Update Posted Date | June 18, 2020 | ||||||||
Actual Study Start Date ICMJE | May 21, 2019 | ||||||||
Estimated Primary Completion Date | January 2024 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||
Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||||||
Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||
Change History | |||||||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Intolerable pain or foreign body sensation of TIVAD [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
|
||||||||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||||||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||||||
Descriptive Information | |||||||||
Brief Title ICMJE | A Study of the IJV or the SCV Approach for Ultrasound-guided Implantation of TIVAD | ||||||||
Official Title ICMJE | A Randomized Observational Study of the Internal Jugular Vein or the Subclavian Vein Approach for Ultrasound-guided Implantation of Totally Implantable Vascular Access Device(TIVAD) | ||||||||
Brief Summary | To compare IJV and SCV as the implantation site of TIVAD and its associated thrombotic or occlusion rate, our study plans to enroll 240 patients with cancer who require central line TIVADs and randomizes them with 1:1 ratio to receive the TIVAD implantation at SCV or IJV. After the implantation, the patients will be regularly followed through phone contact and chart review for 2 years, and any symptomatic thrombosis or occlusion will be found during chemotherapy injection or regular push-pull heparin saline flush every 6 weeks as our hospital care protocol. To detect any asymptomatic thrombosis, the patients will also receive screening vascular ultrasound at 2 weeks, 2 months, and 6 months postoperatively. The study primary endpoints include any infection, asymptomatic thrombosis found by screen ultrasound, and clinically symptomatic thrombosis or occlusion and major mechanical failure/dislocation of TIVAD. | ||||||||
Detailed Description |
A totally implantable venous access device (TIVAD) provides reliable, long-term vascular access and improves cancer patients' quality of life. The use of TIVADs is associated with important complications as infection and venous thrombosis, and studies have shown that several factors are associated, such as cancer types, catheter types, and the location of the catheter tips. Whether subclavian vein(SCV)or internal jugular vein(IJV) is a better site for TIVAD percutaneous access were also widely studied, and there is no definite consensus generated yet. A meta-analysis published in 2016 by Wu et al reviewed 12 studies comparing the internal jugular vein (IJV) with the subclavian vein (SCV) as the percutaneous access site found no differences of TIVAD-related infection and catheter-related thrombotic rate. In the secondary outcome, IJV was associated with reduced risks of total major mechanical complications such as catheter dislocation and malfunction. Of 12 studies included, only 3 were randomized trial and there was no consistency between groups of using ultrasound guidance throughout TIVAD insertion. To be further, there is no description of how close to IJV-SCV junction does IJV group were inserted. Hence, a large well-designed RCT is warranted before the IJV site can be recommended. To compare IJV and SCV as the implantation site of TIVAD and its associated thrombotic or occlusion rate, our study plans to enroll 240 patients with cancer who require central line TIVADs and randomizes them with 1:1 ratio to receive the TIVAD implantation at SCV or IJV. After the implantation, the patients will be regularly followed through phone contact and chart review for 2 years, and any symptomatic thrombosis or occlusion will be found during chemotherapy injection or regular push-pull heparin saline flush every 6 weeks as our hospital care protocol. To detect any asymptomatic thrombosis, the patients will also receive screening vascular ultrasound at 2 weeks, 2 months, and 6 months postoperatively. The study primary endpoints include any infection, asymptomatic thrombosis found by screen ultrasound, and clinically symptomatic thrombosis or occlusion and major mechanical failure/dislocation of TIVAD. |
||||||||
Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||||||
Study Phase ICMJE | Not Applicable | ||||||||
Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: None (Open Label) Primary Purpose: Prevention |
||||||||
Condition ICMJE |
|
||||||||
Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||||||
Study Arms ICMJE |
|
||||||||
Publications * | Not Provided | ||||||||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||||||
Recruitment Information | |||||||||
Recruitment Status ICMJE | Recruiting | ||||||||
Estimated Enrollment ICMJE |
240 | ||||||||
Original Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||
Estimated Study Completion Date ICMJE | January 2024 | ||||||||
Estimated Primary Completion Date | January 2024 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||
Eligibility Criteria ICMJE |
Inclusion: 240 cancer patients, 20~99 years old. Exclusion:
|
||||||||
Sex/Gender ICMJE |
|
||||||||
Ages ICMJE | 20 Years to 99 Years (Adult, Older Adult) | ||||||||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE | No | ||||||||
Contacts ICMJE |
|
||||||||
Listed Location Countries ICMJE | Taiwan | ||||||||
Removed Location Countries | |||||||||
Administrative Information | |||||||||
NCT Number ICMJE | NCT03945045 | ||||||||
Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | 201807144RINC | ||||||||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||||||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product |
|
||||||||
IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||
Responsible Party | National Taiwan University Hospital | ||||||||
Study Sponsor ICMJE | National Taiwan University Hospital | ||||||||
Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||
Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||||||
PRS Account | National Taiwan University Hospital | ||||||||
Verification Date | June 2020 | ||||||||
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |