4006-776-356 出国就医服务电话

免费获得国外相关药品,最快 1 个工作日回馈药物信息

出境医 / 临床实验 / A Study of the IJV or the SCV Approach for Ultrasound-guided Implantation of TIVAD

A Study of the IJV or the SCV Approach for Ultrasound-guided Implantation of TIVAD

Study Description
Brief Summary:
To compare IJV and SCV as the implantation site of TIVAD and its associated thrombotic or occlusion rate, our study plans to enroll 240 patients with cancer who require central line TIVADs and randomizes them with 1:1 ratio to receive the TIVAD implantation at SCV or IJV. After the implantation, the patients will be regularly followed through phone contact and chart review for 2 years, and any symptomatic thrombosis or occlusion will be found during chemotherapy injection or regular push-pull heparin saline flush every 6 weeks as our hospital care protocol. To detect any asymptomatic thrombosis, the patients will also receive screening vascular ultrasound at 2 weeks, 2 months, and 6 months postoperatively. The study primary endpoints include any infection, asymptomatic thrombosis found by screen ultrasound, and clinically symptomatic thrombosis or occlusion and major mechanical failure/dislocation of TIVAD.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Venous Thrombosis Catheter-Related Infections Catheter Mechanical Failure Rate Procedure: Subclavian vein approach Procedure: internal jugular vein approach Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

A totally implantable venous access device (TIVAD) provides reliable, long-term vascular access and improves cancer patients' quality of life. The use of TIVADs is associated with important complications as infection and venous thrombosis, and studies have shown that several factors are associated, such as cancer types, catheter types, and the location of the catheter tips. Whether subclavian vein(SCV)or internal jugular vein(IJV) is a better site for TIVAD percutaneous access were also widely studied, and there is no definite consensus generated yet.

A meta-analysis published in 2016 by Wu et al reviewed 12 studies comparing the internal jugular vein (IJV) with the subclavian vein (SCV) as the percutaneous access site found no differences of TIVAD-related infection and catheter-related thrombotic rate. In the secondary outcome, IJV was associated with reduced risks of total major mechanical complications such as catheter dislocation and malfunction. Of 12 studies included, only 3 were randomized trial and there was no consistency between groups of using ultrasound guidance throughout TIVAD insertion. To be further, there is no description of how close to IJV-SCV junction does IJV group were inserted. Hence, a large well-designed RCT is warranted before the IJV site can be recommended.

To compare IJV and SCV as the implantation site of TIVAD and its associated thrombotic or occlusion rate, our study plans to enroll 240 patients with cancer who require central line TIVADs and randomizes them with 1:1 ratio to receive the TIVAD implantation at SCV or IJV. After the implantation, the patients will be regularly followed through phone contact and chart review for 2 years, and any symptomatic thrombosis or occlusion will be found during chemotherapy injection or regular push-pull heparin saline flush every 6 weeks as our hospital care protocol. To detect any asymptomatic thrombosis, the patients will also receive screening vascular ultrasound at 2 weeks, 2 months, and 6 months postoperatively. The study primary endpoints include any infection, asymptomatic thrombosis found by screen ultrasound, and clinically symptomatic thrombosis or occlusion and major mechanical failure/dislocation of TIVAD.

Study Design
Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 240 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Prevention
Official Title: A Randomized Observational Study of the Internal Jugular Vein or the Subclavian Vein Approach for Ultrasound-guided Implantation of Totally Implantable Vascular Access Device(TIVAD)
Actual Study Start Date : May 21, 2019
Estimated Primary Completion Date : January 2024
Estimated Study Completion Date : January 2024
Arms and Interventions
Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: SCV
TIVAD implanted through subclavian vein under real-time ultrasound guidance
Procedure: Subclavian vein approach
Subclavian vein approach for Ultrasound-guided Implantation of TIVAD
Other Name: SCV

Experimental: IJV
TIVAD implanted through internal jugular vein under real-time ultrasound guidance
Procedure: internal jugular vein approach
internal jugular vein approach for Ultrasound-guided Implantation of TIVAD
Other Name: IJV

Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. infection (blood stream or local wound) [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
    1. catheter-related blood stream infection(CRBSI) due to TIVAD, including:

      1-1. at least one positive blood culture obtained from a peripheral vein, clinical manifestations of infections (i.e., fever, chills, and/or hypotension), and no apparent source for the blood stream infection, except the TIVAD, which leads to the TIVAD removal. Subsequent TIVAD catheter tip culture yields the same organism.

      1-2. Differential time to positivity, with blood culture drawn from the TIVAD that becomes positive at least 2 hr earlier than the peripheral blood culture.

    2. TIVAD local wound infection and/or non-healing will be classified as infection.

  2. asymptomatic venous thrombosis [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
    1. asymptomatic venous thrombosis found by study initiated screening ultrasound at 2 weeks, 2 months, and 6 months postoperatively.
    2. asymptomatic venous thrombosis found by chart review of chest CT/plain film, if exams are available due to other medical indication within 2 years postoperatively.

  3. symptomatic venous thrombosis with positive confirmatory image tests [ Time Frame: 2 years ]

    both positive symptoms and positive confirmative image tests should be met.

    Positive symptom noted by the patient or caregiver, such as

    1. any arm swelling or swelling sensation
    2. suspicious pulmonary embolism with symptom as dyspnea, chest tightness/pain, Hemoptysis...etc.

    Positive confirmatory image tests as

    1. vascular sonography
    2. Catheter-based angiography
    3. Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) or magnetic resonance pulmonary angiography (MRPA)
    4. Ventilation perfusion (V/Q) scanning when pulmonary embolism is suspected.

  4. TIVAD catheter occlusion [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
    Failure or difficult to infuse fluid or withdraw blood from TIVAD. Difficult to withdraw blood from TIVAD in certain body position is not counted.

  5. major mechanical failure, dislocation of TIVAD. [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
    1. catheter kinking, looping, migration to different vessel
    2. catheter disintegration from port.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Intolerable pain or foreign body sensation of TIVAD [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
    1. Subjectively, intolerable "pain or foreign body sensation" of TIVAD, which leads to TIVAD remove without other medical reasons.
    2. Patient requests for TIVAD remove with no pain, no foreign body sensation, and no other medical reasons will not be included in the measure. (that is, "I want to remove TIVAD because TIVAD is an implant")


Eligibility Criteria
Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   20 Years to 99 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion: 240 cancer patients, 20~99 years old.

Exclusion:

  1. Breast cancer, mediastinal tumor above 6 cm, head and neck cancer with/without surgical/radiological treatment, lung tumor above 6 cm,
  2. ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group)performance status>=2, can't tolerate sit-upright or standing postoperative chest plain film,
  3. Allergy to prophylactic antibiotic,
  4. History of previous TIVAD or Hickman catheter implantation. Recent 2 weeks Central venous catheter insertion.
  5. End stage renal disease.
Contacts and Locations

Contacts
Layout table for location contacts
Contact: CHENG-YUAN HSIEH, MD +886972652330 isaac216@gmail.com
Contact: CHENG-YUAN HSIEH, MD +886975386007

Locations
Layout table for location information
Taiwan
National Taiwan University Hospital Recruiting
Taipei, Taiwan
Contact: CHENG-YUAN HSIEH, MD    0972652330    isaac216@gmail.com   
Sponsors and Collaborators
National Taiwan University Hospital
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: CHENG-YUAN HSIEH, MD National Taiwan University Hospital
Tracking Information
First Submitted Date  ICMJE May 5, 2019
First Posted Date  ICMJE May 10, 2019
Last Update Posted Date June 18, 2020
Actual Study Start Date  ICMJE May 21, 2019
Estimated Primary Completion Date January 2024   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Current Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: May 8, 2019)
  • infection (blood stream or local wound) [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
    1. catheter-related blood stream infection(CRBSI) due to TIVAD, including: 1-1. at least one positive blood culture obtained from a peripheral vein, clinical manifestations of infections (i.e., fever, chills, and/or hypotension), and no apparent source for the blood stream infection, except the TIVAD, which leads to the TIVAD removal. Subsequent TIVAD catheter tip culture yields the same organism. 1-2. Differential time to positivity, with blood culture drawn from the TIVAD that becomes positive at least 2 hr earlier than the peripheral blood culture.
    2. TIVAD local wound infection and/or non-healing will be classified as infection.
  • asymptomatic venous thrombosis [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
    1. asymptomatic venous thrombosis found by study initiated screening ultrasound at 2 weeks, 2 months, and 6 months postoperatively.
    2. asymptomatic venous thrombosis found by chart review of chest CT/plain film, if exams are available due to other medical indication within 2 years postoperatively.
  • symptomatic venous thrombosis with positive confirmatory image tests [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
    both positive symptoms and positive confirmative image tests should be met. Positive symptom noted by the patient or caregiver, such as
    1. any arm swelling or swelling sensation
    2. suspicious pulmonary embolism with symptom as dyspnea, chest tightness/pain, Hemoptysis...etc.
    Positive confirmatory image tests as
    1. vascular sonography
    2. Catheter-based angiography
    3. Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) or magnetic resonance pulmonary angiography (MRPA)
    4. Ventilation perfusion (V/Q) scanning when pulmonary embolism is suspected.
  • TIVAD catheter occlusion [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
    Failure or difficult to infuse fluid or withdraw blood from TIVAD. Difficult to withdraw blood from TIVAD in certain body position is not counted.
  • major mechanical failure, dislocation of TIVAD. [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
    1. catheter kinking, looping, migration to different vessel
    2. catheter disintegration from port.
Original Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE Same as current
Change History
Current Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: May 8, 2019)
Intolerable pain or foreign body sensation of TIVAD [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
  1. Subjectively, intolerable "pain or foreign body sensation" of TIVAD, which leads to TIVAD remove without other medical reasons.
  2. Patient requests for TIVAD remove with no pain, no foreign body sensation, and no other medical reasons will not be included in the measure. (that is, "I want to remove TIVAD because TIVAD is an implant")
Original Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE Same as current
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
 
Descriptive Information
Brief Title  ICMJE A Study of the IJV or the SCV Approach for Ultrasound-guided Implantation of TIVAD
Official Title  ICMJE A Randomized Observational Study of the Internal Jugular Vein or the Subclavian Vein Approach for Ultrasound-guided Implantation of Totally Implantable Vascular Access Device(TIVAD)
Brief Summary To compare IJV and SCV as the implantation site of TIVAD and its associated thrombotic or occlusion rate, our study plans to enroll 240 patients with cancer who require central line TIVADs and randomizes them with 1:1 ratio to receive the TIVAD implantation at SCV or IJV. After the implantation, the patients will be regularly followed through phone contact and chart review for 2 years, and any symptomatic thrombosis or occlusion will be found during chemotherapy injection or regular push-pull heparin saline flush every 6 weeks as our hospital care protocol. To detect any asymptomatic thrombosis, the patients will also receive screening vascular ultrasound at 2 weeks, 2 months, and 6 months postoperatively. The study primary endpoints include any infection, asymptomatic thrombosis found by screen ultrasound, and clinically symptomatic thrombosis or occlusion and major mechanical failure/dislocation of TIVAD.
Detailed Description

A totally implantable venous access device (TIVAD) provides reliable, long-term vascular access and improves cancer patients' quality of life. The use of TIVADs is associated with important complications as infection and venous thrombosis, and studies have shown that several factors are associated, such as cancer types, catheter types, and the location of the catheter tips. Whether subclavian vein(SCV)or internal jugular vein(IJV) is a better site for TIVAD percutaneous access were also widely studied, and there is no definite consensus generated yet.

A meta-analysis published in 2016 by Wu et al reviewed 12 studies comparing the internal jugular vein (IJV) with the subclavian vein (SCV) as the percutaneous access site found no differences of TIVAD-related infection and catheter-related thrombotic rate. In the secondary outcome, IJV was associated with reduced risks of total major mechanical complications such as catheter dislocation and malfunction. Of 12 studies included, only 3 were randomized trial and there was no consistency between groups of using ultrasound guidance throughout TIVAD insertion. To be further, there is no description of how close to IJV-SCV junction does IJV group were inserted. Hence, a large well-designed RCT is warranted before the IJV site can be recommended.

To compare IJV and SCV as the implantation site of TIVAD and its associated thrombotic or occlusion rate, our study plans to enroll 240 patients with cancer who require central line TIVADs and randomizes them with 1:1 ratio to receive the TIVAD implantation at SCV or IJV. After the implantation, the patients will be regularly followed through phone contact and chart review for 2 years, and any symptomatic thrombosis or occlusion will be found during chemotherapy injection or regular push-pull heparin saline flush every 6 weeks as our hospital care protocol. To detect any asymptomatic thrombosis, the patients will also receive screening vascular ultrasound at 2 weeks, 2 months, and 6 months postoperatively. The study primary endpoints include any infection, asymptomatic thrombosis found by screen ultrasound, and clinically symptomatic thrombosis or occlusion and major mechanical failure/dislocation of TIVAD.

Study Type  ICMJE Interventional
Study Phase  ICMJE Not Applicable
Study Design  ICMJE Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Prevention
Condition  ICMJE
  • Venous Thrombosis
  • Catheter-Related Infections
  • Catheter Mechanical Failure Rate
Intervention  ICMJE
  • Procedure: Subclavian vein approach
    Subclavian vein approach for Ultrasound-guided Implantation of TIVAD
    Other Name: SCV
  • Procedure: internal jugular vein approach
    internal jugular vein approach for Ultrasound-guided Implantation of TIVAD
    Other Name: IJV
Study Arms  ICMJE
  • Experimental: SCV
    TIVAD implanted through subclavian vein under real-time ultrasound guidance
    Intervention: Procedure: Subclavian vein approach
  • Experimental: IJV
    TIVAD implanted through internal jugular vein under real-time ultrasound guidance
    Intervention: Procedure: internal jugular vein approach
Publications * Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruitment Information
Recruitment Status  ICMJE Recruiting
Estimated Enrollment  ICMJE
 (submitted: May 8, 2019)
240
Original Estimated Enrollment  ICMJE Same as current
Estimated Study Completion Date  ICMJE January 2024
Estimated Primary Completion Date January 2024   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Eligibility Criteria  ICMJE

Inclusion: 240 cancer patients, 20~99 years old.

Exclusion:

  1. Breast cancer, mediastinal tumor above 6 cm, head and neck cancer with/without surgical/radiological treatment, lung tumor above 6 cm,
  2. ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group)performance status>=2, can't tolerate sit-upright or standing postoperative chest plain film,
  3. Allergy to prophylactic antibiotic,
  4. History of previous TIVAD or Hickman catheter implantation. Recent 2 weeks Central venous catheter insertion.
  5. End stage renal disease.
Sex/Gender  ICMJE
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
Ages  ICMJE 20 Years to 99 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers  ICMJE No
Contacts  ICMJE
Contact: CHENG-YUAN HSIEH, MD +886972652330 isaac216@gmail.com
Contact: CHENG-YUAN HSIEH, MD +886975386007
Listed Location Countries  ICMJE Taiwan
Removed Location Countries  
 
Administrative Information
NCT Number  ICMJE NCT03945045
Other Study ID Numbers  ICMJE 201807144RINC
Has Data Monitoring Committee No
U.S. FDA-regulated Product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
IPD Sharing Statement  ICMJE Not Provided
Responsible Party National Taiwan University Hospital
Study Sponsor  ICMJE National Taiwan University Hospital
Collaborators  ICMJE Not Provided
Investigators  ICMJE
Principal Investigator: CHENG-YUAN HSIEH, MD National Taiwan University Hospital
PRS Account National Taiwan University Hospital
Verification Date June 2020

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP

治疗医院