4006-776-356 出国就医服务电话

免费获得国外相关药品,最快 1 个工作日回馈药物信息

出境医 / 临床实验 / Study of Efficacy and Safety of LOU064 in Inadequately Controlled Asthma Patients

Study of Efficacy and Safety of LOU064 in Inadequately Controlled Asthma Patients

Study Description
Brief Summary:
This was a proof-of-concept study to evaluate the efficacy of LOU064 in patients with inadequately controlled asthma. All subjects were randomized with 3:2 ratio to receive LOU064 100 mg once daily or LOU064 matching placebo for 12 weeks with standard background therapy of budesonide 80 µg/formoterol 4.5 µg two inhalations twice a day (b.i.d).

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Asthma Drug: LOU064 100 mg Drug: Placebo Phase 2

Detailed Description:

This was a non-confirmatory, multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, subject- and investigator-blinded, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LOU064 in patients with inadequately controlled asthma who were on a standardized background therapy of inhaled corticosteroid plus long acting beta-2 agonist (ICS/LABA).

The study included:

  • a Screening period of up to 2 weeks to assess eligibility.
  • a Run-in period of minimum 3 weeks and maximum 5 weeks where patients discontinued their current asthma therapy and were placed on budesonide 80 μg/formoterol 4.5 μg delivered by dry powder inhaler, two inhalations twice a day (b.i.d).
  • a Treatment period of 12 weeks. All subjects were randomized 3:2 to receive LOU064 100 mg once daily or placebo for 12 weeks with standard background therapy of budesonide 80 μg/formoterol 4.5 μg, two inhalations b.i.d.
  • a Follow-up period of 3 weeks following the last dose of study drug. Results from the interim analysis did not provide sufficient evidence of efficacy of LOU064 in inadequately controlled asthma and the sponsor decided to terminate early the study in April 2020. The median duration of exposure (12.0 weeks for LOU064 and 11.7 weeks for placebo) was close to the treatment target, as most of the subjects had completed treatment when the study was terminated.
Study Design
Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 76 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Randomized, Subject- and Investigator-blinded, Placebo-controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of LOU064 in Patients With Inadequately Controlled Asthma
Actual Study Start Date : July 18, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date : April 27, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date : April 27, 2020
Arms and Interventions
Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: LOU064
LOU064 100 mg once daily orally
Drug: LOU064 100 mg
LOU064 100 mg once daily orally administered as two 50 mg capsules

Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo once daily orally
Drug: Placebo
Placebo once daily administered orally as capsules

Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Change From Baseline in Pre-dose FEV1 at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ]

    FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in one second) is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation, measured through spirometry testing. Pre-dose FEV1 is defined as average of the two FEV1 measurements taken 45 min and 15 min pre-dose.

    The baseline pre-dose FEV1 is defined as the average of the FEV1 measurements performed 45 min and 15 min prior to dosing on Day 1.

    A positive change from baseline in pre-dose FEV1 is considered a favorable outcome.

    Change from baseline in pre-dose FEV1 was analyzed using a Bayesian model for repeated measures, adjusting for effects of treatment*visit interaction and baseline pre-dose FEV1. A weakly informative prior was considered for the placebo response.



Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Maximum Observed Blood Concentrations (Cmax) of LOU064 at Steady State [ Time Frame: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours after dosing on Days 15 and 85 ]
    Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on LOU064 blood concentrations determined by a validated liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method with a lower limit of quantification of 1 ng/mL. Cmax was determined using non-compartmental methods.

  2. Time to Reach Maximum Blood Concentrations (Tmax) of LOU064 at Steady State [ Time Frame: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours after dosing on Days 15 and 85 ]
    PK parameters were calculated based on LOU064 blood concentrations determined by a validated LC-MS/MS method with a lower limit of quantification of 1 ng/mL. Tmax was determined using non-compartmental methods.

  3. Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours (AUC0-24h) of LOU064 at Steady State [ Time Frame: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours after dosing on Days 15 and 85 ]
    PK parameters were calculated based on LOU064 blood concentrations determined by a validated LC-MS/MS method with a lower limit of quantification of 1 ng/mL. AUC0-24h was determined using non-compartmental methods. The linear trapezoidal rule was used for AUC0-24h calculation.

  4. Change From Baseline in Asthma Symptom Questionnaire-5 Score (ACQ-5) at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ]

    The ACQ-5 is a five-item, self-completed questionnaire, which is used as a measure of asthma control of a participant. Patients were asked to recall how their asthma had been during the previous week and to respond to the symptom questions on a 7-point scale (0=no impairment, 6=maximum impairment). The questions are equally weighted and the overall ACQ-5 score is the mean of all 5 questions, therefore between 0 (totally controlled) and 6 (severely uncontrolled).

    The baseline values of ACQ-5 were collected at the baseline visit. A negative change from baseline in ACQ-5 is considered a favorable outcome. Change from baseline in ACQ-5 score was analyzed using a Bayesian model for repeated measures, adjusting for effects of treatment*visit interaction and baseline ACQ-5 score. Non-informative priors were considered.


  5. Change From Baseline in Mean Morning and Mean Evening Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) [ Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 9-12 ]

    PEF (Peak Expiratory Flow) is a person's maximum speed of expiration. All participants were instructed to record PEF twice daily before taking any medication using an electronic peak expiratory flow device (ePEF), once in the morning and once approximately 12 h later in the evening at home. At each timepoint, the participant was instructed to perform 3 consecutive manoeuvres within 10 minutes. These PEF values were captured in the e-PEF/diary. For each day the best value in the morning and in the evening were considered and mean values on 4-week intervals were derived.

    The baseline values of PEF were the mean values in the run-in period. A positive change from baseline in PEF is considered a favorable outcome. Change from baseline in mean morning and mean evening PEF were analyzed using a Bayesian model for repeated measures, adjusting for effects of treatment*weeks interaction and baseline PEF values. Non-informative priors were considered.


  6. Change From Baseline in Number of Puffs of SABA Taken Per Day During the Treatment Period [ Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks ]

    Participants were given a short acting β2-agonist (SABA; salbutamol, known also as albuterol) to use as rescue medication throughout the study along with an electronic diary (eDiary) to record rescue medication use. Participants recorded in the eDiary, once in the morning and once in the evening, the use of rescue medication (number of puffs of SABA taken in the previous 12 hours). The total number of puffs of SABA taken per day was calculated and the mean daily use of puffs of SABA over 12 weeks was derived.

    The baseline values of number of puffs of SABA taken per day were defined as the average from all non-missing records taken during the run-in period. A negative change from baseline is considered a favorable outcome.

    Change from baseline in number of puffs of SABA taken per day was analyzed using a Bayesian model, adjusting for effects of baseline SABA use, baseline FEV1, baseline asthma daytime symptom score and treatment. Non-informative priors were considered.


  7. Change From Baseline in Daytime and Nighttime Asthma Symptom Score [ Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 9-12 ]

    Participants recorded asthma symptoms twice daily in the eDiary. Daytime asthma symptoms were assessed before bed and nighttime symptoms on awakening.

    • Daytime asthma symptom score included 4 questions. Overall score (0 to 6) was calculated as the average of the 4 questions with higher values indicating more asthma symptoms.
    • Nighttime asthma symptom score included 2 questions. Overall score (0 to 3.5) was calculated as the average of the 2 questions with higher values indicating more asthma symptoms.

    Mean values of both scores were calculated over 4-week intervals during the treatment period.

    The baseline values of both asthma symptoms scores were defined as the average score during the run-in period. A negative change from baseline is a favorable outcome.

    Change from baseline in daytime and nighttime asthma symptom score were analyzed using a Bayesian model for repeated measures, adjusting for effects of treatment*weeks and baseline scores. Non-informative priors were considered.



Eligibility Criteria
Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 70 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female adult patients aged ≥ 18 to ≤ 70 years at screening.
  • Patients must weigh at least 40 kg to participate in the study, and must have a body mass index (BMI) <35 kg/m2. BMI = Body weight (kg) / [Height (m)]2 at screening
  • Patients with a physician-diagnosed history of asthma (according to GINA 2018) for a period of at least 6 months prior to screening.
  • Patients who have been treated with:

    • Medium or high dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), or
    • ICS plus long-acting beta agonist (LABA), or
    • ICS plus leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA), or
    • ICS plus long-acting beta agonist (LABA) and long lasting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) for at least 1 month prior to screening and on the same doses of the above mentioned medications over at least 2 weeks prior to start of the run-in period.
  • Post-bronchodilator reversibility of FEV1 ≥ 12% and ≥ 200 mL at screening. If reversibility is not demonstrated at screening, then two additional attempts are permitted (one at the run-in visit and the last one during the run-in period between the run-in visit and baseline visit if needed)
  • Spirometry with pre-bronchodilator FEV1 ≥ 40% of predicted (at screening and baseline) and ≤ 85% of predicted at the baseline visit.
  • ACQ-5 score ≥ 1.5 at baseline visit
  • ≥ 80% compliance with peak expiratory flow measurement and recording of symptoms in the eDiary during the run-in period.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have had an asthma exacerbation requiring systemic corticosteroids, hospitalization, or emergency room visit within 6 weeks prior to screening or during the screening period.
  • Patients who have smoked or inhaled any substance other than asthma medications within the 6 month period prior to screening, or who have a smoking history of greater than 10 pack years (e.g. 10 pack years = 1 pack/day x 10 years or ½ pack/day x 20 years, etc.).
  • History of life-threatening asthma event such as significant hypercarbia (pCO2 > 45 mmHg), endotracheal intubation, non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), respiratory arrest, or seizure as a result of asthma.
  • Patients with chronic lung diseases other than asthma, including (but not limited to) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, clinically significant bronchiectasis, sarcoidosis, interstitial lung disease, cystic fibrosis, Churg-Strauss syndrome, allergic broncho-pulmonary aspergillosis, or clinically significant chronic lung diseases related to a history of tuberculosis or asbestosis.
  • History or current diagnosis of ECG abnormalities indicating significant risk of safety for subjects participating in the study such as:

    • Concomitant clinically significant cardiac arrhythmias, e.g. sustained ventricular tachycardia, and clinically significant second or third degree AV block without a pacemaker
    • History of familial long QT syndrome or known family history of Torsades de Pointes
    • Resting heart rate (physical exam or 12 lead ECG) < 50 bpm at screening
    • Resting QTcF ≥ 450 msec (male) or ≥ 460 msec (female) at screening or inability to determine the QTcF interval
    • Use of agents known to prolong the QT interval unless they can be permanently discontinued for the duration of study
  • At screening and/or run-in period, any severe, progressive or uncontrolled, acute or chronic, medical or psychiatric condition, or other factors such as abnormal vital signs, ECG or physical findings, or clinically relevant abnormal laboratory values, that in the judgment of the investigator may increase the risk associated with study participation/treatment or may interfere with interpretation of study results, and thus would make the patient inappropriate for entry into or continuing the study.
  • Major surgery within 8 weeks prior to screening or surgery planned prior to end of study.
  • History of live attenuated vaccine within 6 weeks prior to randomization or requirement to receive vaccinations at any time during the study.
  • Hematology parameters at screening:

    • Hemoglobin: < 10 g/dl
    • Platelets: < 100 000/mm3
    • White blood cells: < 3 000/mm3
    • Neutrophils: < 1 500/mm3
  • Significant bleeding risk or coagulation disorders.
  • History of gastrointestinal bleeding, e.g. in association with use of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID).
  • Requirement for anti-platelet or anticoagulant medication (e.g., warfarin, or clopidogrel or Novel Oral Anti-Coagulant (NOAC)) other than acetylsalicylic acid (up to 100 mg/d).
  • History or presence of thrombotic or thromboembolic event, or increased risk for thrombotic or thromboembolic event.
Contacts and Locations

Locations
Layout table for location information
United States, Colorado
Novartis Investigative Site
Denver, Colorado, United States, 80230
United States, Massachusetts
Novartis Investigative Site
North Dartmouth, Massachusetts, United States, 02747
United States, Missouri
Novartis Investigative Site
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63141
United States, North Carolina
Novartis Investigative Site
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States, 27607
Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
Caba, Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1056ABJ
Novartis Investigative Site
Caba, Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1425BEN
Novartis Investigative Site
Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina, S2000DBS
Novartis Investigative Site
Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina, S2000JKR
Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, Germany, 10787
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, Germany, 12159
Novartis Investigative Site
Frankfurt, Germany, 60596
Novartis Investigative Site
Hamburg, Germany, 20354
Novartis Investigative Site
Hannover, Germany, 30173
Poland
Novartis Investigative Site
Biaystok, Poland, 15-430
Novartis Investigative Site
Grudziadz, Poland, 86-300
Novartis Investigative Site
Krakow, Poland, 30033
Novartis Investigative Site
Poznan, Poland, 60 823
Russian Federation
Novartis Investigative Site
Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation, 196143
Novartis Investigative Site
Ulyanovsk, Russian Federation, 432063
Sponsors and Collaborators
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Tracking Information
First Submitted Date  ICMJE May 2, 2019
First Posted Date  ICMJE May 9, 2019
Results First Submitted Date  ICMJE March 30, 2021
Results First Posted Date  ICMJE April 27, 2021
Last Update Posted Date April 27, 2021
Actual Study Start Date  ICMJE July 18, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date April 27, 2020   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Current Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: March 30, 2021)
Change From Baseline in Pre-dose FEV1 at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ]
FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in one second) is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation, measured through spirometry testing. Pre-dose FEV1 is defined as average of the two FEV1 measurements taken 45 min and 15 min pre-dose. The baseline pre-dose FEV1 is defined as the average of the FEV1 measurements performed 45 min and 15 min prior to dosing on Day 1. A positive change from baseline in pre-dose FEV1 is considered a favorable outcome. Change from baseline in pre-dose FEV1 was analyzed using a Bayesian model for repeated measures, adjusting for effects of treatment*visit interaction and baseline pre-dose FEV1. A weakly informative prior was considered for the placebo response.
Original Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: May 8, 2019)
pre-dose FEV1 [ Time Frame: from baseline to 12 weeks ]
change from baseline in pre-dose FEV1 after 12 weeks of treatment with LOU064 experimental dose or placebo
Change History
Current Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: March 30, 2021)
  • Maximum Observed Blood Concentrations (Cmax) of LOU064 at Steady State [ Time Frame: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours after dosing on Days 15 and 85 ]
    Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on LOU064 blood concentrations determined by a validated liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method with a lower limit of quantification of 1 ng/mL. Cmax was determined using non-compartmental methods.
  • Time to Reach Maximum Blood Concentrations (Tmax) of LOU064 at Steady State [ Time Frame: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours after dosing on Days 15 and 85 ]
    PK parameters were calculated based on LOU064 blood concentrations determined by a validated LC-MS/MS method with a lower limit of quantification of 1 ng/mL. Tmax was determined using non-compartmental methods.
  • Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours (AUC0-24h) of LOU064 at Steady State [ Time Frame: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours after dosing on Days 15 and 85 ]
    PK parameters were calculated based on LOU064 blood concentrations determined by a validated LC-MS/MS method with a lower limit of quantification of 1 ng/mL. AUC0-24h was determined using non-compartmental methods. The linear trapezoidal rule was used for AUC0-24h calculation.
  • Change From Baseline in Asthma Symptom Questionnaire-5 Score (ACQ-5) at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ]
    The ACQ-5 is a five-item, self-completed questionnaire, which is used as a measure of asthma control of a participant. Patients were asked to recall how their asthma had been during the previous week and to respond to the symptom questions on a 7-point scale (0=no impairment, 6=maximum impairment). The questions are equally weighted and the overall ACQ-5 score is the mean of all 5 questions, therefore between 0 (totally controlled) and 6 (severely uncontrolled). The baseline values of ACQ-5 were collected at the baseline visit. A negative change from baseline in ACQ-5 is considered a favorable outcome. Change from baseline in ACQ-5 score was analyzed using a Bayesian model for repeated measures, adjusting for effects of treatment*visit interaction and baseline ACQ-5 score. Non-informative priors were considered.
  • Change From Baseline in Mean Morning and Mean Evening Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) [ Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 9-12 ]
    PEF (Peak Expiratory Flow) is a person's maximum speed of expiration. All participants were instructed to record PEF twice daily before taking any medication using an electronic peak expiratory flow device (ePEF), once in the morning and once approximately 12 h later in the evening at home. At each timepoint, the participant was instructed to perform 3 consecutive manoeuvres within 10 minutes. These PEF values were captured in the e-PEF/diary. For each day the best value in the morning and in the evening were considered and mean values on 4-week intervals were derived. The baseline values of PEF were the mean values in the run-in period. A positive change from baseline in PEF is considered a favorable outcome. Change from baseline in mean morning and mean evening PEF were analyzed using a Bayesian model for repeated measures, adjusting for effects of treatment*weeks interaction and baseline PEF values. Non-informative priors were considered.
  • Change From Baseline in Number of Puffs of SABA Taken Per Day During the Treatment Period [ Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks ]
    Participants were given a short acting β2-agonist (SABA; salbutamol, known also as albuterol) to use as rescue medication throughout the study along with an electronic diary (eDiary) to record rescue medication use. Participants recorded in the eDiary, once in the morning and once in the evening, the use of rescue medication (number of puffs of SABA taken in the previous 12 hours). The total number of puffs of SABA taken per day was calculated and the mean daily use of puffs of SABA over 12 weeks was derived. The baseline values of number of puffs of SABA taken per day were defined as the average from all non-missing records taken during the run-in period. A negative change from baseline is considered a favorable outcome. Change from baseline in number of puffs of SABA taken per day was analyzed using a Bayesian model, adjusting for effects of baseline SABA use, baseline FEV1, baseline asthma daytime symptom score and treatment. Non-informative priors were considered.
  • Change From Baseline in Daytime and Nighttime Asthma Symptom Score [ Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 9-12 ]
    Participants recorded asthma symptoms twice daily in the eDiary. Daytime asthma symptoms were assessed before bed and nighttime symptoms on awakening.
    • Daytime asthma symptom score included 4 questions. Overall score (0 to 6) was calculated as the average of the 4 questions with higher values indicating more asthma symptoms.
    • Nighttime asthma symptom score included 2 questions. Overall score (0 to 3.5) was calculated as the average of the 2 questions with higher values indicating more asthma symptoms.
    Mean values of both scores were calculated over 4-week intervals during the treatment period. The baseline values of both asthma symptoms scores were defined as the average score during the run-in period. A negative change from baseline is a favorable outcome. Change from baseline in daytime and nighttime asthma symptom score were analyzed using a Bayesian model for repeated measures, adjusting for effects of treatment*weeks and baseline scores. Non-informative priors were considered.
Original Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: May 8, 2019)
  • pharmacokinetic profile of LOU064 [ Time Frame: from predose to 12 weeks ]
    Concentrations of LOU064 in blood at steady state and calculation of Cmax
  • Pharmacokinetic profile of LOU064 [ Time Frame: from predose to 12 weeks ]
    Concentrations of LOU064 in blood at steady state and calculation of Tmax
  • Pharmacokinetic profile of LOU064 [ Time Frame: from predose to 12 weeks ]
    Concentrations of LOU064 in blood at steady state and calculation of MRT
  • Pharmacokinetic profile of LOU064 [ Time Frame: from predose to 12 weeks ]
    Concentrations of LOU064 in blood at steady state and calculation of AUC0-24h
  • Asthma Symptom Questionnaire-5 score [ Time Frame: from baseline to 12 weeks ]
    change from baseline in ACQ-5 over 12 weeks of treatment
  • Peak Expiratory Flow [ Time Frame: from baseline to 12 weeks ]
    change from baseline in PEF(AM and PM), as assessed by mean morning and mean evening PEF over 12 weeks of treatment
  • number of puffs of SABA taken per day [ Time Frame: from baseline to 12 weeks ]
    number of puffs of SABA taken per day over 12 weeks of treatment
  • daytime and nighttime asthma symptom score [ Time Frame: from baseline to 12 weeks ]
    Change from baseline in daytime and nighttime asthma symptom score over 12 weeks of treatment
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
 
Descriptive Information
Brief Title  ICMJE Study of Efficacy and Safety of LOU064 in Inadequately Controlled Asthma Patients
Official Title  ICMJE A Randomized, Subject- and Investigator-blinded, Placebo-controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of LOU064 in Patients With Inadequately Controlled Asthma
Brief Summary This was a proof-of-concept study to evaluate the efficacy of LOU064 in patients with inadequately controlled asthma. All subjects were randomized with 3:2 ratio to receive LOU064 100 mg once daily or LOU064 matching placebo for 12 weeks with standard background therapy of budesonide 80 µg/formoterol 4.5 µg two inhalations twice a day (b.i.d).
Detailed Description

This was a non-confirmatory, multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, subject- and investigator-blinded, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LOU064 in patients with inadequately controlled asthma who were on a standardized background therapy of inhaled corticosteroid plus long acting beta-2 agonist (ICS/LABA).

The study included:

  • a Screening period of up to 2 weeks to assess eligibility.
  • a Run-in period of minimum 3 weeks and maximum 5 weeks where patients discontinued their current asthma therapy and were placed on budesonide 80 μg/formoterol 4.5 μg delivered by dry powder inhaler, two inhalations twice a day (b.i.d).
  • a Treatment period of 12 weeks. All subjects were randomized 3:2 to receive LOU064 100 mg once daily or placebo for 12 weeks with standard background therapy of budesonide 80 μg/formoterol 4.5 μg, two inhalations b.i.d.
  • a Follow-up period of 3 weeks following the last dose of study drug. Results from the interim analysis did not provide sufficient evidence of efficacy of LOU064 in inadequately controlled asthma and the sponsor decided to terminate early the study in April 2020. The median duration of exposure (12.0 weeks for LOU064 and 11.7 weeks for placebo) was close to the treatment target, as most of the subjects had completed treatment when the study was terminated.
Study Type  ICMJE Interventional
Study Phase  ICMJE Phase 2
Study Design  ICMJE Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Condition  ICMJE Asthma
Intervention  ICMJE
  • Drug: LOU064 100 mg
    LOU064 100 mg once daily orally administered as two 50 mg capsules
  • Drug: Placebo
    Placebo once daily administered orally as capsules
Study Arms  ICMJE
  • Experimental: LOU064
    LOU064 100 mg once daily orally
    Intervention: Drug: LOU064 100 mg
  • Placebo Comparator: Placebo
    Placebo once daily orally
    Intervention: Drug: Placebo
Publications * Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruitment Information
Recruitment Status  ICMJE Terminated
Actual Enrollment  ICMJE
 (submitted: June 26, 2020)
76
Original Estimated Enrollment  ICMJE
 (submitted: May 8, 2019)
110
Actual Study Completion Date  ICMJE April 27, 2020
Actual Primary Completion Date April 27, 2020   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Eligibility Criteria  ICMJE

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female adult patients aged ≥ 18 to ≤ 70 years at screening.
  • Patients must weigh at least 40 kg to participate in the study, and must have a body mass index (BMI) <35 kg/m2. BMI = Body weight (kg) / [Height (m)]2 at screening
  • Patients with a physician-diagnosed history of asthma (according to GINA 2018) for a period of at least 6 months prior to screening.
  • Patients who have been treated with:

    • Medium or high dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), or
    • ICS plus long-acting beta agonist (LABA), or
    • ICS plus leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA), or
    • ICS plus long-acting beta agonist (LABA) and long lasting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) for at least 1 month prior to screening and on the same doses of the above mentioned medications over at least 2 weeks prior to start of the run-in period.
  • Post-bronchodilator reversibility of FEV1 ≥ 12% and ≥ 200 mL at screening. If reversibility is not demonstrated at screening, then two additional attempts are permitted (one at the run-in visit and the last one during the run-in period between the run-in visit and baseline visit if needed)
  • Spirometry with pre-bronchodilator FEV1 ≥ 40% of predicted (at screening and baseline) and ≤ 85% of predicted at the baseline visit.
  • ACQ-5 score ≥ 1.5 at baseline visit
  • ≥ 80% compliance with peak expiratory flow measurement and recording of symptoms in the eDiary during the run-in period.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have had an asthma exacerbation requiring systemic corticosteroids, hospitalization, or emergency room visit within 6 weeks prior to screening or during the screening period.
  • Patients who have smoked or inhaled any substance other than asthma medications within the 6 month period prior to screening, or who have a smoking history of greater than 10 pack years (e.g. 10 pack years = 1 pack/day x 10 years or ½ pack/day x 20 years, etc.).
  • History of life-threatening asthma event such as significant hypercarbia (pCO2 > 45 mmHg), endotracheal intubation, non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), respiratory arrest, or seizure as a result of asthma.
  • Patients with chronic lung diseases other than asthma, including (but not limited to) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, clinically significant bronchiectasis, sarcoidosis, interstitial lung disease, cystic fibrosis, Churg-Strauss syndrome, allergic broncho-pulmonary aspergillosis, or clinically significant chronic lung diseases related to a history of tuberculosis or asbestosis.
  • History or current diagnosis of ECG abnormalities indicating significant risk of safety for subjects participating in the study such as:

    • Concomitant clinically significant cardiac arrhythmias, e.g. sustained ventricular tachycardia, and clinically significant second or third degree AV block without a pacemaker
    • History of familial long QT syndrome or known family history of Torsades de Pointes
    • Resting heart rate (physical exam or 12 lead ECG) < 50 bpm at screening
    • Resting QTcF ≥ 450 msec (male) or ≥ 460 msec (female) at screening or inability to determine the QTcF interval
    • Use of agents known to prolong the QT interval unless they can be permanently discontinued for the duration of study
  • At screening and/or run-in period, any severe, progressive or uncontrolled, acute or chronic, medical or psychiatric condition, or other factors such as abnormal vital signs, ECG or physical findings, or clinically relevant abnormal laboratory values, that in the judgment of the investigator may increase the risk associated with study participation/treatment or may interfere with interpretation of study results, and thus would make the patient inappropriate for entry into or continuing the study.
  • Major surgery within 8 weeks prior to screening or surgery planned prior to end of study.
  • History of live attenuated vaccine within 6 weeks prior to randomization or requirement to receive vaccinations at any time during the study.
  • Hematology parameters at screening:

    • Hemoglobin: < 10 g/dl
    • Platelets: < 100 000/mm3
    • White blood cells: < 3 000/mm3
    • Neutrophils: < 1 500/mm3
  • Significant bleeding risk or coagulation disorders.
  • History of gastrointestinal bleeding, e.g. in association with use of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID).
  • Requirement for anti-platelet or anticoagulant medication (e.g., warfarin, or clopidogrel or Novel Oral Anti-Coagulant (NOAC)) other than acetylsalicylic acid (up to 100 mg/d).
  • History or presence of thrombotic or thromboembolic event, or increased risk for thrombotic or thromboembolic event.
Sex/Gender  ICMJE
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
Ages  ICMJE 18 Years to 70 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers  ICMJE No
Contacts  ICMJE Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Listed Location Countries  ICMJE Argentina,   Germany,   Poland,   Russian Federation,   United States
Removed Location Countries  
 
Administrative Information
NCT Number  ICMJE NCT03944707
Other Study ID Numbers  ICMJE CLOU064D12201
2018-003609-24 ( EudraCT Number )
Has Data Monitoring Committee No
U.S. FDA-regulated Product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
IPD Sharing Statement  ICMJE
Plan to Share IPD: Yes
Plan Description:

Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations.

This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.

Responsible Party Novartis ( Novartis Pharmaceuticals )
Study Sponsor  ICMJE Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Collaborators  ICMJE Not Provided
Investigators  ICMJE Not Provided
PRS Account Novartis
Verification Date March 2021

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP