Abdominoplasty is one of the most popular body-contouring procedures. Patients that undergo body-contouring abdominoplasty usually have important analgesic requirements. Given the substantial incision and soft-tissue undermining associated with this procedure, postoperative pain is a concern for patients and surgeons. Previous studies have typically incorporated multiple nerve blocks to improve analgesia after abdominoplasty. Different anesthetic techniques have been developed to overcome this problem such as Epidural anesthesia, Transversus abdominis plane block either open technique or ultrasound-guided, Paravertebral block and Erector Spinea plane block. Improving postoperative pain control in this kind of surgery leads to earlier mobilization, shortened hospital stay, reduced hospital costs, and increased patient satisfaction.
The ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a recent block described for various surgeries for postoperative analgesia. It is reported that it have an analgesic effect on somatic and visceral pain by affecting the ventral rami and rami communicantes that include sympathetic nerve fibres, as LA spreads through the paravertebral space. When performed bilaterally it has been reported to be as effective as thoracic epidural analgesia.
The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a technique of locoregional anesthesia that blocks the sensorial afferent nerves localized between the transversus abdominis muscle and the internal oblique muscle.
In this study, the analgesic efficacy and duration of ultrasound (US) guided Erector spinea plane block and Transversus abdominis plane block when Lidocaine HCL is added as an adjuvant to bupivacaine will be compared.
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Abdominoplasty | Procedure: Erector spinea plane block group Procedure: Transversus abdominis plane block Procedure: Control group | Not Applicable |
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Estimated Enrollment : | 69 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Intervention Model Description: | single-blind study |
Masking: | Single (Outcomes Assessor) |
Primary Purpose: | Supportive Care |
Official Title: | Erector Spinae Plane Block: An Analgesic Technique as an Alternative to Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Abdominoplasty Surgery |
Actual Study Start Date : | April 1, 2019 |
Estimated Primary Completion Date : | April 2021 |
Estimated Study Completion Date : | June 2021 |
Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Erector spinea plane block group
this group is planned for ultrasound-guided Transversus abdominis plane block
|
Procedure: Erector spinea plane block group
Which will receive ultrasound-guided erector spinea plane block bilaterally and the local anesthetic injected will be total volume 25 ml on each side consisting of 15ml of 0.5% plus 5 ml 2% lidocaine HCL plus 5 ml saline
|
Active Comparator: Transversus abdominis plane block
this group is planned for ultrasound-guided Transversus abdominis plane block
|
Procedure: Transversus abdominis plane block
Which will receive ultrasound-guided Transversus Abdominis plane block bilaterally and the local anesthetic used will be total volume 25 ml on each side consisting of 15ml of 0.5% plus 5 ml 2% lidocaine HCL plus 5 ml saline
|
Placebo Comparator: Control group
standard general anesthesia
|
Procedure: Control group
this group will receive only standard general anesthesia
|
Ages Eligible for Study: | 25 Years to 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Contact: Mona A Hasheesh, MD | 01223912912947 | drmonahasheesh@hotmail.com | |
Contact: Hanaa M Elbendary, MD | 00201005781768 | hanaa_elbendary@yahoo.com |
Egypt | |
Hanaa M Elbendary | Recruiting |
Mansourah, DK, Egypt, 050 | |
Contact: Hanaa M Elbendary, MD 00201005781768 ext 00201005781768 hanaa_elbendary@yahoo.com | |
Contact: Mona A Hasheesh, MD drmonahasheesh@hotmail.com | |
Sub-Investigator: Tamer E Farahat, MD | |
Sub-Investigator: Ayat E Eid, MD |
Study Chair: | Hanaa M Elbendary, MD | Anesthesia Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University |
Tracking Information | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date ICMJE | May 6, 2019 | ||||||||||||||
First Posted Date ICMJE | May 7, 2019 | ||||||||||||||
Last Update Posted Date | September 25, 2020 | ||||||||||||||
Actual Study Start Date ICMJE | April 1, 2019 | ||||||||||||||
Estimated Primary Completion Date | April 2021 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||||||||
Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Total opioid consumption [ Time Frame: For 24 hours after performing block ] cumulative consumption of rescue opioids during the first postoperative day
|
||||||||||||||
Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Total opioid consumption [ Time Frame: For 24 hours after performing block ] Cummulative consumption of rescue opioids during the first postoperative day
|
||||||||||||||
Change History | |||||||||||||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||||||||||||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||||||||||||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||||||||||||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||||||||||||
Descriptive Information | |||||||||||||||
Brief Title ICMJE | Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Abdominoplasty Surgery | ||||||||||||||
Official Title ICMJE | Erector Spinae Plane Block: An Analgesic Technique as an Alternative to Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Abdominoplasty Surgery | ||||||||||||||
Brief Summary |
Abdominoplasty is one of the most popular body-contouring procedures. Patients that undergo body-contouring abdominoplasty usually have important analgesic requirements. Given the substantial incision and soft-tissue undermining associated with this procedure, postoperative pain is a concern for patients and surgeons. Previous studies have typically incorporated multiple nerve blocks to improve analgesia after abdominoplasty. Different anesthetic techniques have been developed to overcome this problem such as Epidural anesthesia, Transversus abdominis plane block either open technique or ultrasound-guided, Paravertebral block and Erector Spinea plane block. Improving postoperative pain control in this kind of surgery leads to earlier mobilization, shortened hospital stay, reduced hospital costs, and increased patient satisfaction. The ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a recent block described for various surgeries for postoperative analgesia. It is reported that it have an analgesic effect on somatic and visceral pain by affecting the ventral rami and rami communicantes that include sympathetic nerve fibres, as LA spreads through the paravertebral space. When performed bilaterally it has been reported to be as effective as thoracic epidural analgesia. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a technique of locoregional anesthesia that blocks the sensorial afferent nerves localized between the transversus abdominis muscle and the internal oblique muscle. In this study, the analgesic efficacy and duration of ultrasound (US) guided Erector spinea plane block and Transversus abdominis plane block when Lidocaine HCL is added as an adjuvant to bupivacaine will be compared. |
||||||||||||||
Detailed Description | Sample size was calculated using Power Analysis and Sample Size software program (PASS) version 15.0.5 for windows (2017) using previous results with the mean opioid consumption in the first postoperative day as the primary outcome. Effect size of 0.5 (medium effect size) was calculated using the difference between the mean opioid consumption in TAB group (140 mg) and that in ESPB group (124.6 mg) with an estimated standard deviation of 30 in both groups. This study will add a control group in which only intravenous analgesics will be used; hence the aforementioned effect size was used for sample size calculation using a one-way ANOVA test. Sample sizes of 18 patients in each group are needed to achieve 90% power (1-β) to detect differences among the means using an F test with a 0.05 significance level (α). The size of the variation in the means is represented by the effect size f = σm / σ, which is 0.5. A 20% drop out is expected so the drop-out inflated sample size will be 23 patients in each group. | ||||||||||||||
Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||||||||||||
Study Phase ICMJE | Not Applicable | ||||||||||||||
Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Intervention Model Description: single-blind study Masking: Single (Outcomes Assessor)Primary Purpose: Supportive Care |
||||||||||||||
Condition ICMJE | Abdominoplasty | ||||||||||||||
Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||||||||||||
Study Arms ICMJE |
|
||||||||||||||
Publications * | Mankikar MG, Sardesai SP, Ghodki PS. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing caesarean section. Indian J Anaesth. 2016 Apr;60(4):253-7. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.179451. | ||||||||||||||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||||||||||||
Recruitment Information | |||||||||||||||
Recruitment Status ICMJE | Recruiting | ||||||||||||||
Estimated Enrollment ICMJE |
69 | ||||||||||||||
Original Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||||||||
Estimated Study Completion Date ICMJE | June 2021 | ||||||||||||||
Estimated Primary Completion Date | April 2021 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||||||||
Eligibility Criteria ICMJE |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||||||||||||
Sex/Gender ICMJE |
|
||||||||||||||
Ages ICMJE | 25 Years to 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult) | ||||||||||||||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE | No | ||||||||||||||
Contacts ICMJE |
|
||||||||||||||
Listed Location Countries ICMJE | Egypt | ||||||||||||||
Removed Location Countries | |||||||||||||||
Administrative Information | |||||||||||||||
NCT Number ICMJE | NCT03940885 | ||||||||||||||
Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | MD.19.03.155 | ||||||||||||||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes | ||||||||||||||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product |
|
||||||||||||||
IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE |
|
||||||||||||||
Responsible Party | Mansoura University | ||||||||||||||
Study Sponsor ICMJE | Mansoura University | ||||||||||||||
Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||||||||
Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||||||||||||
PRS Account | Mansoura University | ||||||||||||||
Verification Date | September 2020 | ||||||||||||||
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |