| November 18, 2018
|
| May 7, 2019
|
| May 7, 2019
|
| October 1, 2017
|
| December 31, 2019 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
|
- Operation time,min [ Time Frame: 1 week ]
The surgeon begins the operation until the incision is closed
- Docking time,min [ Time Frame: 1 week ]
From the skin cutting through the observation hole to the robot moving to the designated position, the lens and the instrument arm enter the abdominal cavity and prepare for this period
|
|
Same as current
|
| No Changes Posted
|
- Evaluated blood loss ,ml [ Time Frame: 1 week ]
The amount of bleeding in the suction device plus the amount of bleeding dipped in the gauze
- Number of retrieved lymph nodes [ Time Frame: 1 week ]
Refer to the postoperative pathology report
- Day of first flatus,day [ Time Frame: 2 week ]
- Day of first fluid diet,day [ Time Frame: 2 week ]
- the rate of postoperative complications [ Time Frame: 30 days after the operation ]
Postoperative complications included infectious complications, intra-abdominal/intraluminal bleeding, gastric stasis and leakage
- postoperative hospital stay, days [ Time Frame: 30 days after the operation ]
Length of postoperative hospital stay
- cost [ Time Frame: 30 days after the operation ]
total cost in the hospital
|
|
Same as current
|
| Not Provided
|
| Not Provided
|
| |
| Learning Curve for Robot-Assisted Gastrectomy in Gastric Cancer
|
| Cumulative Summation Analysis of Learning Curve for Robot-Assisted Gastrectomy in Gastric Cancer
|
| The investigators prospectively collected the clinical data of Da Vinci robot-assisted radical gastrectomy patients conducted by the same group of physicians from October 2017 to October 2018. The learning curve of the surgery was analyzed with the moving average method and the cumulative sum analysis (CUSUM). The short-term efficacy was then validated by comparing the perioperative and pathologic outcomes of patients in the two stages of the learning curve.
|
| Not Provided
|
| Observational
|
Observational Model: Cohort Time Perspective: Prospective
|
| Not Provided
|
| Not Provided
|
| Non-Probability Sample
|
| patients were scheduled to undergo minimally invasive gastric cancer surgery and meet the above conditions
|
| Stomach Neoplasms
|
| Not Provided
|
| Not Provided
|
| Not Provided
|
| |
| Unknown status
|
| 100
|
|
Same as current
|
| February 28, 2020
|
| December 31, 2019 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
|
|
Inclusion Criteria:
- 1.Patients were 18-90 years old
- 2. Patients with a documented diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma
- 3. patients were scheduled to undergo minimally invasive gastric cancer surgery
- 4.patients with no preoperative evidence of serosal invasion or extraperigastric lymph node metastasis on preoperative computed tomography scans, upper endoscopy, and endoscopic ultrasound
Exclusion Criteria:
- 1. Patients with neoadjuvant treatment
- 2. Patients procedure concurrent with the gastrectomy
- 3.Patients with palliative surgery
- 4. Patients with the contraindications for general anesthesia
- 5. Patients were pregnant or mentally incompetent
- 6. Patients with serious systemic comorbidities, such as severe heart failure, respiratory failure, uncontrolled hypertension
|
| Sexes Eligible for Study: |
All |
|
| 18 Years to 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
|
| No
|
|
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
|
| China
|
|
|
| |
| NCT03940417
|
| XJTU1AF2019LSK-005
|
| No
|
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: |
No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: |
No |
|
| Not Provided
|
| First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University
|
| First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University
|
| Not Provided
|
| Not Provided
|
| First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University
|
| November 2018
|