Pulmonary resection surgery is currently the recommended curative treatment for early stages of non-small cell lung cancer. The implementation of preoperative respiratory rehabilitation programs has shown beneficial results on pulmonary function, functional level, cardiorespiratory conditioning and the occurrence and severity of postoperative complications in this population of patients. Despite these benefits, the most recent meta-analyzes highlight the fact that training modalities (duration, frequencies, intensity) are very heterogeneous. It is then difficult to structure a program only on the basis of data from the literature.
In a cohort analysis of 50 patients trained from 2014 to 2017, our team reported a significantly greater improvement in physiological parameters in patients who performed 15 or more preoperative training sessions. This number of 15 outpatient sessions is therefore considered a minimum training goal in our current practice.
The difficulty of the oncological context is to find the compromise between the necessary diligence to initiate the cancer surgical treatment and the necessary time to obtain the benefits of the preoperative rehabilitation. Previous study reports the difficulty of setting up a four-week training program, perceived as delaying surgery. In order to prevent any risk of prolonging the surgical management time, rehabilitation teams routinely offer short programs with high training frequencies of up to five to six sessions per week. It seems important to note that preoperative rehabilitation is normally considered in patients for whom there is a risk of moderate to high postoperative complications according to the European and North American recommendations. Thus these patients generally benefit from a longer period of assessment than patients whose risk is considered low in terms of their cardio-respiratory and muscular function.
The median duration between the physiological evaluation of patients considered "at risk" before pulmonary resection surgery is 44 (Q1-Q3 29-76) days at Rouen University Hospital, with no significant differences observed between patients who have benefited or not from preoperative rehabilitation. Some teams have even pointed out that there is no difference in survival prognosis in the short or long term between patients who have had an operative delay of more or less 60 or 90 days respectively, which shows the compatibility with the set up a dedicated training course.
As mentioned earlier, the concept of delay has led to extremely dense training for a functionally and cardio-respiratory fragile target population as evidenced by pejorative VO2peak. The density of the training, failing to generate significant physiological stimulation, may increase fatigue or limit adherence to training, especially if it requires movement, and is added to a therapeutic planning including many consultations and further examinations. To date, no study has evaluated the density of preoperative supervised training on pre-surgical benefits.
The objective of this work is to compare the effectiveness of a program of 15 training sessions on VO2peak according to two different densities, namely five times a week over three weeks, or three times a week over five weeks.
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Other: Preoperative Pulmonary Rehabilitation | Not Applicable |
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Estimated Enrollment : | 36 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | Single (Outcomes Assessor) |
Primary Purpose: | Supportive Care |
Official Title: | Effect of Two Different Preoperative Training Densities in Patients With Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Before Lung Resection Surgery |
Actual Study Start Date : | May 7, 2019 |
Estimated Primary Completion Date : | May 2021 |
Estimated Study Completion Date : | May 2021 |
Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Group 1
5 Preoperative Pulmonary Rehabilitation sessions / week during 3 weeks.
|
Other: Preoperative Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Each prehabilitation session will last approximately 90 minutes and will include:
|
Group 2
3 Preoperative Pulmonary Rehabilitation sessions / week during 5 weeks.
|
Other: Preoperative Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Each prehabilitation session will last approximately 90 minutes and will include:
|
Full name of the scale : "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire and modular supplement for Lung Cancer patients" (EORTC QLQ-C30 / LC13) The EORTC QLQ-C30, is a 30 questions questionnaire developed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, to assess the QoL of cancer patients. It has been translated and validated into over 100 languages and is used in more than 3,000 studies worldwide.
For patients with Lung Cancer, a 13 questions modular supplement, the LC-13, is validated.
The HRQoL is therefore evaluated by a set of 43 questions gathering all aspects that could be impacted.
A raw score is calculated for each dimension and summary score, then standardized from 0 to 100 points. The additional module for Lung Cancer (LC-13) provides a complementary dimension with specific items related to the tumor site.
(see Fayers et. al., The EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual (3rd Edition) 2001.
Full name of the scale : "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire and modular supplement for Lung Cancer patients" (EORTC QLQ-C30 / LC13) The EORTC QLQ-C30, is a 30 questions questionnaire developed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, to assess the QoL of cancer patients. It has been translated and validated into over 100 languages and is used in more than 3,000 studies worldwide.
For patients with Lung Cancer, a 13 questions modular supplement, the LC-13, is validated.
The HRQoL is therefore evaluated by a set of 43 questions gathering all aspects that could be impacted.
A raw score is calculated for each dimension and summary score, then standardized from 0 to 100 points. The additional module for Lung Cancer (LC-13) provides a complementary dimension with specific items related to the tumor site.
(see Fayers et. al., The EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual (3rd Edition) 2001.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Contact: Francis-Edouard GRAVIER, MSc | +33235592970 | kine@adir-hautenormandie.com |
France | |
ADIR Association | Recruiting |
Bois-Guillaume, Normandie, France, 76230 | |
Contact: Francis-Edouard FE GRAVIER, MSc +33235592970 kine@adir-hautenormandie.com | |
Principal Investigator: Antoine CUVELIER, MD, PhD | |
Sub-Investigator: Francis-Edouard GRAVIER, MSc | |
Sub-Investigator: Tristan BONNEVIE, MSc | |
Sub-Investigator: Jean-François MUIR, MD | |
Sub-Investigator: David DEBEAUMONT, MD |
Tracking Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date ICMJE | April 30, 2019 | ||||
First Posted Date ICMJE | May 3, 2019 | ||||
Last Update Posted Date | July 22, 2020 | ||||
Actual Study Start Date ICMJE | May 7, 2019 | ||||
Estimated Primary Completion Date | May 2021 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||
Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
Change History | |||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||
Descriptive Information | |||||
Brief Title ICMJE | Effect of Two Different Preoperative Training Densities in Patients With Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Before Lung Resection Surgery | ||||
Official Title ICMJE | Effect of Two Different Preoperative Training Densities in Patients With Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Before Lung Resection Surgery | ||||
Brief Summary |
Pulmonary resection surgery is currently the recommended curative treatment for early stages of non-small cell lung cancer. The implementation of preoperative respiratory rehabilitation programs has shown beneficial results on pulmonary function, functional level, cardiorespiratory conditioning and the occurrence and severity of postoperative complications in this population of patients. Despite these benefits, the most recent meta-analyzes highlight the fact that training modalities (duration, frequencies, intensity) are very heterogeneous. It is then difficult to structure a program only on the basis of data from the literature. In a cohort analysis of 50 patients trained from 2014 to 2017, our team reported a significantly greater improvement in physiological parameters in patients who performed 15 or more preoperative training sessions. This number of 15 outpatient sessions is therefore considered a minimum training goal in our current practice. The difficulty of the oncological context is to find the compromise between the necessary diligence to initiate the cancer surgical treatment and the necessary time to obtain the benefits of the preoperative rehabilitation. Previous study reports the difficulty of setting up a four-week training program, perceived as delaying surgery. In order to prevent any risk of prolonging the surgical management time, rehabilitation teams routinely offer short programs with high training frequencies of up to five to six sessions per week. It seems important to note that preoperative rehabilitation is normally considered in patients for whom there is a risk of moderate to high postoperative complications according to the European and North American recommendations. Thus these patients generally benefit from a longer period of assessment than patients whose risk is considered low in terms of their cardio-respiratory and muscular function. The median duration between the physiological evaluation of patients considered "at risk" before pulmonary resection surgery is 44 (Q1-Q3 29-76) days at Rouen University Hospital, with no significant differences observed between patients who have benefited or not from preoperative rehabilitation. Some teams have even pointed out that there is no difference in survival prognosis in the short or long term between patients who have had an operative delay of more or less 60 or 90 days respectively, which shows the compatibility with the set up a dedicated training course. As mentioned earlier, the concept of delay has led to extremely dense training for a functionally and cardio-respiratory fragile target population as evidenced by pejorative VO2peak. The density of the training, failing to generate significant physiological stimulation, may increase fatigue or limit adherence to training, especially if it requires movement, and is added to a therapeutic planning including many consultations and further examinations. To date, no study has evaluated the density of preoperative supervised training on pre-surgical benefits. The objective of this work is to compare the effectiveness of a program of 15 training sessions on VO2peak according to two different densities, namely five times a week over three weeks, or three times a week over five weeks. |
||||
Detailed Description | Not Provided | ||||
Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
Study Phase ICMJE | Not Applicable | ||||
Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single (Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Supportive Care |
||||
Condition ICMJE | Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | ||||
Intervention ICMJE | Other: Preoperative Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Each prehabilitation session will last approximately 90 minutes and will include:
|
||||
Study Arms ICMJE |
|
||||
Publications * | Not Provided | ||||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
Recruitment Information | |||||
Recruitment Status ICMJE | Recruiting | ||||
Estimated Enrollment ICMJE |
36 | ||||
Original Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
Estimated Study Completion Date ICMJE | May 2021 | ||||
Estimated Primary Completion Date | May 2021 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Eligibility Criteria ICMJE |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
Sex/Gender ICMJE |
|
||||
Ages ICMJE | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) | ||||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE | No | ||||
Contacts ICMJE |
|
||||
Listed Location Countries ICMJE | France | ||||
Removed Location Countries | |||||
Administrative Information | |||||
NCT Number ICMJE | NCT03936764 | ||||
Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | Preo-Dens ID-RCB : 2018-A03301-54 ( Registry Identifier: 2018-A03301-54 ) |
||||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes | ||||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product |
|
||||
IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
Responsible Party | ADIR Association | ||||
Study Sponsor ICMJE | ADIR Association | ||||
Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
Investigators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
PRS Account | ADIR Association | ||||
Verification Date | July 2020 | ||||
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |