4006-776-356 出国就医服务电话

免费获得国外相关药品,最快 1 个工作日回馈药物信息

出境医 / 临床实验 / Predictors of Poor Bowel Cleansing and Capsule Endoscopy (CEPREDICT) (CEPREDICT)

Predictors of Poor Bowel Cleansing and Capsule Endoscopy (CEPREDICT) (CEPREDICT)

Study Description
Brief Summary:
The main purpose of the study is to determine risk factors of poor bowel cleansing in patients referred for colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) examination. Patients will be prepared with polyethylene glycol (PEG), and a booster by using oral low volume sodium phosphate (NaP) and sodium-amidotrizoate and meglumine-amidotrizoate (Gastrografin ®) The investigators also will try to design a predictive score of poor bowel cleansing and to validate the Bowel cleansing score designed by Leighton and modified by Spada

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment
Colon Adenoma Device: Colon Capsule Endoscopy

Detailed Description:

As in conventional colonoscopy, colon cleansing is essential to achieve a quality examination through the colon capsule endoscopy. The CCE also presents additional difficulties due to the inability to distend the walls of the colon, aspirate liquid and debris and wash. These reasons make that the colonic preparation should be even more effective when the exploration is going to be performed by CCE than with the conventional colonoscopy. Using a combination of PEG, sodium phosphate and bysacodil suppository achieves at least 80% of well-prepared CCE. The rate of CCE with inadequate preparation according to different studies ranges from 12% to 34% . It has recently been suggested that the addition of a water-soluble contrast agent such as Gastrografin® commonly used in different radiological tests could improve cleaning.

Although, predictive factors of poor bowel cleansing in outpatient conventional colonoscopy are well-known, currently, there are no studies that evaluate the independent predictive factors of poor colonic preparation in patients who undergo a CCE. The investigation of the predictive factors of poor colonic preparation in these patients, following the current recommendations can be of great interest to identify those patients with greater difficulties in obtaining an acceptable cleaning quality.

The researchers will offer to participate in the study to patients scheduled for CCE who meet all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria. The researchers will explain the purpose of the study and will ask to sign the informed consent. They will give verbal and written information on the diet and the bowel cleansing solution to be taken. The bowel cleansing quality following Spada Bowel Preparation Scale will be assessed by the endoscopist The aim of this study is to figure out the risk factors of bowel cleansing of inadequate bowel preparation in patients referred for colon capsule endoscopy.

A maximum of 8 variables in the multivariate analysis will be included. Considering a percentage of poor preparation of 20%, the inclusion of 350 patients will be necessary. A maximum of 15% of losses will be considered, so the final sample size will be 403 patients.

A univariate and multivariate analysis will be carried out to determine those factors associated with a lack of progression from capsule to rectum and accelerated progression. For the first of these objectives, well prepared colonoscopies but in which the rectum was not identified (identification of the hemorrhoidal plexus) will be excluded.

Study Design
Layout table for study information
Study Type : Observational
Estimated Enrollment : 403 participants
Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Prospective
Official Title: Risk Factors of Inadequate Bowel Cleansing in Colon Capsule Endoscopy
Estimated Study Start Date : May 2019
Estimated Primary Completion Date : November 2020
Estimated Study Completion Date : December 2020
Arms and Interventions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Colon cleansing [ Time Frame: [Time frame: 20 months][Designated as safety issue: No] ]
    Quality of bowel cleansing assessed by the Spada Bowel Preparation Scale. Cleansing is classified from 1 ( no preparation) to 4 (excellent preparation) in each of the 4 segments of the colon (proximal colon, transverse colon, distal colon and rectum)


Eligibility Criteria
Contacts and Locations
Tracking Information
First Submitted Date April 28, 2019
First Posted Date May 1, 2019
Last Update Posted Date May 7, 2019
Estimated Study Start Date May 2019
Estimated Primary Completion Date November 2020   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Current Primary Outcome Measures
 (submitted: April 30, 2019)
Colon cleansing [ Time Frame: [Time frame: 20 months][Designated as safety issue: No] ]
Quality of bowel cleansing assessed by the Spada Bowel Preparation Scale. Cleansing is classified from 1 ( no preparation) to 4 (excellent preparation) in each of the 4 segments of the colon (proximal colon, transverse colon, distal colon and rectum)
Original Primary Outcome Measures Same as current
Change History
Current Secondary Outcome Measures Not Provided
Original Secondary Outcome Measures Not Provided
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
 
Descriptive Information
Brief Title Predictors of Poor Bowel Cleansing and Capsule Endoscopy (CEPREDICT)
Official Title Risk Factors of Inadequate Bowel Cleansing in Colon Capsule Endoscopy
Brief Summary The main purpose of the study is to determine risk factors of poor bowel cleansing in patients referred for colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) examination. Patients will be prepared with polyethylene glycol (PEG), and a booster by using oral low volume sodium phosphate (NaP) and sodium-amidotrizoate and meglumine-amidotrizoate (Gastrografin ®) The investigators also will try to design a predictive score of poor bowel cleansing and to validate the Bowel cleansing score designed by Leighton and modified by Spada
Detailed Description

As in conventional colonoscopy, colon cleansing is essential to achieve a quality examination through the colon capsule endoscopy. The CCE also presents additional difficulties due to the inability to distend the walls of the colon, aspirate liquid and debris and wash. These reasons make that the colonic preparation should be even more effective when the exploration is going to be performed by CCE than with the conventional colonoscopy. Using a combination of PEG, sodium phosphate and bysacodil suppository achieves at least 80% of well-prepared CCE. The rate of CCE with inadequate preparation according to different studies ranges from 12% to 34% . It has recently been suggested that the addition of a water-soluble contrast agent such as Gastrografin® commonly used in different radiological tests could improve cleaning.

Although, predictive factors of poor bowel cleansing in outpatient conventional colonoscopy are well-known, currently, there are no studies that evaluate the independent predictive factors of poor colonic preparation in patients who undergo a CCE. The investigation of the predictive factors of poor colonic preparation in these patients, following the current recommendations can be of great interest to identify those patients with greater difficulties in obtaining an acceptable cleaning quality.

The researchers will offer to participate in the study to patients scheduled for CCE who meet all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria. The researchers will explain the purpose of the study and will ask to sign the informed consent. They will give verbal and written information on the diet and the bowel cleansing solution to be taken. The bowel cleansing quality following Spada Bowel Preparation Scale will be assessed by the endoscopist The aim of this study is to figure out the risk factors of bowel cleansing of inadequate bowel preparation in patients referred for colon capsule endoscopy.

A maximum of 8 variables in the multivariate analysis will be included. Considering a percentage of poor preparation of 20%, the inclusion of 350 patients will be necessary. A maximum of 15% of losses will be considered, so the final sample size will be 403 patients.

A univariate and multivariate analysis will be carried out to determine those factors associated with a lack of progression from capsule to rectum and accelerated progression. For the first of these objectives, well prepared colonoscopies but in which the rectum was not identified (identification of the hemorrhoidal plexus) will be excluded.

Study Type Observational
Study Design Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Prospective
Target Follow-Up Duration Not Provided
Biospecimen Not Provided
Sampling Method Probability Sample
Study Population All patients referred for colon capsule endoscopy meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria will be included in the study. Spanish hospitals with the availability of colon capsule endoscopy will be invited to participate in the study
Condition Colon Adenoma
Intervention Device: Colon Capsule Endoscopy
The capsule endoscopy will be ingested by the participant. This device captures images along the large bowel. This images are stored in an external memory and afterwards they are downloaded in a computer
Study Groups/Cohorts Not Provided
Publications *
  • Spada C, Hassan C, Munoz-Navas M, Neuhaus H, Deviere J, Fockens P, Coron E, Gay G, Toth E, Riccioni ME, Carretero C, Charton JP, Van Gossum A, Wientjes CA, Sacher-Huvelin S, Delvaux M, Nemeth A, Petruzziello L, de Frias CP, Mayershofer R, Amininejad L, Dekker E, Galmiche JP, Frederic M, Johansson GW, Cesaro P, Costamagna G. Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Sep;74(3):581-589.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1125. Epub 2011 May 20. Erratum in: Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Nov;74(5):1174. Aminejab, Leila [corrected to Amininejad, Leila].
  • Alarcón-Fernández O, Ramos L, Adrián-de-Ganzo Z, Gimeno-García AZ, Nicolás-Pérez D, Jiménez A, Quintero E. Effects of colon capsule endoscopy on medical decision making in patients with incomplete colonoscopies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 May;11(5):534-40.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.10.016. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
  • Spada C, Hassan C, Galmiche JP, Neuhaus H, Dumonceau JM, Adler S, Epstein O, Gay G, Pennazio M, Rex DK, Benamouzig R, de Franchis R, Delvaux M, Devière J, Eliakim R, Fraser C, Hagenmuller F, Herrerias JM, Keuchel M, Macrae F, Munoz-Navas M, Ponchon T, Quintero E, Riccioni ME, Rondonotti E, Marmo R, Sung JJ, Tajiri H, Toth E, Triantafyllou K, Van Gossum A, Costamagna G; European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Colon capsule endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2012 May;44(5):527-36. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291717. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
  • Spada C, Hassan C, Costamagna G. Colon capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2015 Apr;25(2):387-401. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2014.11.007. Epub 2015 Jan 28. Review.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruitment Information
Recruitment Status Unknown status
Estimated Enrollment
 (submitted: April 30, 2019)
403
Original Estimated Enrollment Same as current
Estimated Study Completion Date December 2020
Estimated Primary Completion Date November 2020   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Patients referred for colon capsule endoscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ileus, intestinal obstruction, megacolon.
  • Poorly controlled hypertension (HTAS> 180 HTAD> 100).
  • Terminal renal failure (pre-dialysis or dialysis).
  • Congestive heart failure (NYHA III-IV).
  • Acute liver failure.
  • Severe psychiatric illness.
  • Dementia with difficulty in the intake of the preparation.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Refusal to participate in the study.
  • Inability to follow the instructions.
  • Alergies
Sex/Gender
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
Ages 18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers No
Contacts Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Listed Location Countries Not Provided
Removed Location Countries  
 
Administrative Information
NCT Number NCT03933371
Other Study ID Numbers CEPREDICT
Has Data Monitoring Committee No
U.S. FDA-regulated Product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD: No
Responsible Party Hospital Universitario de Canarias
Study Sponsor Hospital Universitario de Canarias
Collaborators Not Provided
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Antonio Z Gimeno Garcia, MD, PhD Hospital Universitario de Canarias
PRS Account Hospital Universitario de Canarias
Verification Date May 2019