4006-776-356 出国就医服务电话

免费获得国外相关药品,最快 1 个工作日回馈药物信息

出境医 / 临床实验 / Impact of Intensive Follow-up for Bone Metastasis on Characteristics and Prognosis of Chinese Breast Cancer Patients

Impact of Intensive Follow-up for Bone Metastasis on Characteristics and Prognosis of Chinese Breast Cancer Patients

Study Description
Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to retrospectively collect and analyse the characteristics of breast cancer patients with bone metastasis, and compare the impact of intensive follow-up with standard post-operative surveillance on survival of Chinese breast cancer patients.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment
Breast Cancer Bone Metastases Diagnostic Test: Intensive screening / routine screening

Detailed Description:

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in women, and the incidence rate is gradually increasing, accounts for the first place in the incidence of female malignant tumors. Bone metastasis is the most common distant metastatic site for breast cancer, accounting for approximately 70% of all patients with advanced breast cancer. About 26%-50% of breast cancer patients with primary metastases are bone. Autopsy results showed that the overall incidence of breast cancer bone metastasis was about 47%-85%.

Postoperative routine screening for bone metastases in breast cancer patients, whether domestic or foreign, is not recommended in most guidelines. These recommendations were based on two prospective randomized controlled trials in Italy in 1990s, indicated that a bone scan every six months or annually didn't provide a survival benefit to the patient. However, there were researches showing that about 11% of patients with asymptomatic breast cancer have bone metastases, suggesting that early screening might detect more patients with asymptomatic bone metastases. The meta-analysis also pointed out that early screening may prolong the disease-free survival of patients. Besides, the imaging techniques have advance rapidly and remarkably since then. New trials are needed to figure out whether imaging screening of asymptomatic patients should be routinely performed to detect more asymptomatic bone metastases needs further investigation.

Study Design
Layout table for study information
Study Type : Observational
Actual Enrollment : 1500 participants
Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Retrospective
Official Title: Impact of Intensive Follow-up for Bone Metastasis on Characteristics and Prognosis of Chinese Breast Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Actual Study Start Date : March 1, 2018
Actual Primary Completion Date : March 31, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date : March 31, 2019
Arms and Interventions
Group/Cohort Intervention/treatment
Bone metastasis screening
The information about bone metastasis screening is retrospectively collected.
Diagnostic Test: Intensive screening / routine screening
Recommendation and results of bone imaging such as bone scan or PET/CT, or bone CT /MR are collected.

Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Overall survival [ Time Frame: 60 months, and bone scan is repeated every 12 months ]
    defined as the period from randomization to death from any cause, and it is censored at the last follow-up date when the patient is alive


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. disease-free survival [ Time Frame: 60 months, and bone scan is repeated every 12 months ]
    defined as time to disease recurrence (invasive local, regional, or distant metastasis) or death from any cause

  2. distant metastasis-free survival [ Time Frame: 60 months, and bone scan is repeated every 12 months ]
    defined as time to distant metastasis


Eligibility Criteria
Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 70 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   Female
Sampling Method:   Probability Sample
Study Population
1500 breast cancer patients with bone metastasis diagnosed between 2006 and 2011
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

A. Histologically proven breast cancer confirmed by biopsy or pathological examination of the resected tumor.

B. Histologically confirmed breast cancer patients, fulfilling any of the following:

  1. . Multiple bone metastases indicated by bone scan
  2. . Bone scan positive, and proven by other imaging examinations, including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and X-ray.
  3. . Bone scan positive, with clinical symptoms, including bone pain, pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression and so on.
  4. . Bone metastases indicated by PET-CT
  5. . Histologically proven bone metastases

Exclusion Criteria:

A. No bone metastases confirmed by pathological examination B. Bone metastases secondary to other malignant tumor other than breast cancer C. Secondary primary tumor

Contacts and Locations

Locations
Layout table for location information
China, Beijing
Peking University People's Hospital
Beijing, Beijing, China, 100044
Sponsors and Collaborators
Peking University People's Hospital
Fudan University
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
Sun Yat-sen University
Harbin Medical University
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Shu Wang, MD Peking University People's Hospital
Tracking Information
First Submitted Date March 8, 2019
First Posted Date April 23, 2019
Last Update Posted Date April 23, 2019
Actual Study Start Date March 1, 2018
Actual Primary Completion Date March 31, 2019   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Current Primary Outcome Measures
 (submitted: April 21, 2019)
Overall survival [ Time Frame: 60 months, and bone scan is repeated every 12 months ]
defined as the period from randomization to death from any cause, and it is censored at the last follow-up date when the patient is alive
Original Primary Outcome Measures Same as current
Change History No Changes Posted
Current Secondary Outcome Measures
 (submitted: April 21, 2019)
  • disease-free survival [ Time Frame: 60 months, and bone scan is repeated every 12 months ]
    defined as time to disease recurrence (invasive local, regional, or distant metastasis) or death from any cause
  • distant metastasis-free survival [ Time Frame: 60 months, and bone scan is repeated every 12 months ]
    defined as time to distant metastasis
Original Secondary Outcome Measures Same as current
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
 
Descriptive Information
Brief Title Impact of Intensive Follow-up for Bone Metastasis on Characteristics and Prognosis of Chinese Breast Cancer Patients
Official Title Impact of Intensive Follow-up for Bone Metastasis on Characteristics and Prognosis of Chinese Breast Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Brief Summary The purpose of this study is to retrospectively collect and analyse the characteristics of breast cancer patients with bone metastasis, and compare the impact of intensive follow-up with standard post-operative surveillance on survival of Chinese breast cancer patients.
Detailed Description

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in women, and the incidence rate is gradually increasing, accounts for the first place in the incidence of female malignant tumors. Bone metastasis is the most common distant metastatic site for breast cancer, accounting for approximately 70% of all patients with advanced breast cancer. About 26%-50% of breast cancer patients with primary metastases are bone. Autopsy results showed that the overall incidence of breast cancer bone metastasis was about 47%-85%.

Postoperative routine screening for bone metastases in breast cancer patients, whether domestic or foreign, is not recommended in most guidelines. These recommendations were based on two prospective randomized controlled trials in Italy in 1990s, indicated that a bone scan every six months or annually didn't provide a survival benefit to the patient. However, there were researches showing that about 11% of patients with asymptomatic breast cancer have bone metastases, suggesting that early screening might detect more patients with asymptomatic bone metastases. The meta-analysis also pointed out that early screening may prolong the disease-free survival of patients. Besides, the imaging techniques have advance rapidly and remarkably since then. New trials are needed to figure out whether imaging screening of asymptomatic patients should be routinely performed to detect more asymptomatic bone metastases needs further investigation.

Study Type Observational
Study Design Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Retrospective
Target Follow-Up Duration Not Provided
Biospecimen Not Provided
Sampling Method Probability Sample
Study Population 1500 breast cancer patients with bone metastasis diagnosed between 2006 and 2011
Condition
  • Breast Cancer
  • Bone Metastases
Intervention Diagnostic Test: Intensive screening / routine screening
Recommendation and results of bone imaging such as bone scan or PET/CT, or bone CT /MR are collected.
Study Groups/Cohorts Bone metastasis screening
The information about bone metastasis screening is retrospectively collected.
Intervention: Diagnostic Test: Intensive screening / routine screening
Publications *
  • Rosselli Del Turco M, Palli D, Cariddi A, Ciatto S, Pacini P, Distante V. Intensive diagnostic follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer. A randomized trial. National Research Council Project on Breast Cancer follow-up. JAMA. 1994 May 25;271(20):1593-7.
  • Impact of follow-up testing on survival and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients. A multicenter randomized controlled trial. The GIVIO Investigators. JAMA. 1994 May 25;271(20):1587-92.
  • Palli D, Russo A, Saieva C, Ciatto S, Rosselli Del Turco M, Distante V, Pacini P. Intensive vs clinical follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer: 10-year update of a randomized trial. National Research Council Project on Breast Cancer Follow-up. JAMA. 1999 May 5;281(17):1586.
  • Rojas MP, Telaro E, Russo A, Moschetti I, Coe L, Fossati R, Palli D, del Roselli TM, Liberati A. Follow-up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;(1):CD001768. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(5):CD001768.
  • Gradishar WJ, Anderson BO, Balassanian R, Blair SL, Burstein HJ, Cyr A, Elias AD, Farrar WB, Forero A, Giordano SH, Goetz M, Goldstein LJ, Hudis CA, Isakoff SJ, Marcom PK, Mayer IA, McCormick B, Moran M, Patel SA, Pierce LJ, Reed EC, Salerno KE, Schwartzberg LS, Smith KL, Smith ML, Soliman H, Somlo G, Telli M, Ward JH, Shead DA, Kumar R. Invasive Breast Cancer Version 1.2016, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 Mar;14(3):324-54.
  • Khatcheressian JL, Hurley P, Bantug E, Esserman LJ, Grunfeld E, Halberg F, Hantel A, Henry NL, Muss HB, Smith TJ, Vogel VG, Wolff AC, Somerfield MR, Davidson NE; American Society of Clinical Oncology. Breast cancer follow-up and management after primary treatment: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Mar 1;31(7):961-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.9859. Epub 2012 Nov 5. Review.
  • Yong M, Jensen AÖ, Jacobsen JB, Nørgaard M, Fryzek JP, Sørensen HT. Survival in breast cancer patients with bone metastases and skeletal-related events: a population-based cohort study in Denmark (1999-2007). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Sep;129(2):495-503. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1475-5. Epub 2011 Apr 2.
  • Gong Y, Liu YR, Ji P, Hu X, Shao ZM. Impact of molecular subtypes on metastatic breast cancer patients: a SEER population-based study. Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 27;7:45411. doi: 10.1038/srep45411.
  • Xiong Z, Deng G, Huang X, Li X, Xie X, Wang J, Shuang Z, Wang X. Bone metastasis pattern in initial metastatic breast cancer: a population-based study. Cancer Manag Res. 2018 Feb 9;10:287-295. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S155524. eCollection 2018.
  • Zhang H, Zhu W, Biskup E, Yang W, Yang Z, Wang H, Qiu X, Zhang C, Hu G, Hu G. Incidence, risk factors and prognostic characteristics of bone metastases and skeletal-related events (SREs) in breast cancer patients: A systematic review of the real world data. J Bone Oncol. 2018 Feb 3;11:38-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2018.01.004. eCollection 2018 Jun. Review.
  • Coleman R, de Boer R, Eidtmann H, Llombart A, Davidson N, Neven P, von Minckwitz G, Sleeboom HP, Forbes J, Barrios C, Frassoldati A, Campbell I, Paija O, Martin N, Modi A, Bundred N. Zoledronic acid (zoledronate) for postmenopausal women with early breast cancer receiving adjuvant letrozole (ZO-FAST study): final 60-month results. Ann Oncol. 2013 Feb;24(2):398-405. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds277. Epub 2012 Oct 9.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruitment Information
Recruitment Status Completed
Actual Enrollment
 (submitted: April 21, 2019)
1500
Original Actual Enrollment Same as current
Actual Study Completion Date March 31, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date March 31, 2019   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

A. Histologically proven breast cancer confirmed by biopsy or pathological examination of the resected tumor.

B. Histologically confirmed breast cancer patients, fulfilling any of the following:

  1. . Multiple bone metastases indicated by bone scan
  2. . Bone scan positive, and proven by other imaging examinations, including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and X-ray.
  3. . Bone scan positive, with clinical symptoms, including bone pain, pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression and so on.
  4. . Bone metastases indicated by PET-CT
  5. . Histologically proven bone metastases

Exclusion Criteria:

A. No bone metastases confirmed by pathological examination B. Bone metastases secondary to other malignant tumor other than breast cancer C. Secondary primary tumor

Sex/Gender
Sexes Eligible for Study: Female
Ages 18 Years to 70 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers Not Provided
Contacts Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Listed Location Countries China
Removed Location Countries  
 
Administrative Information
NCT Number NCT03924609
Other Study ID Numbers 20160504
Has Data Monitoring Committee Not Provided
U.S. FDA-regulated Product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
IPD Sharing Statement Not Provided
Responsible Party Peking University People's Hospital
Study Sponsor Peking University People's Hospital
Collaborators
  • Fudan University
  • Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
  • Sun Yat-sen University
  • Harbin Medical University
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Shu Wang, MD Peking University People's Hospital
PRS Account Peking University People's Hospital
Verification Date April 2019

治疗医院