4006-776-356 出国就医服务电话

免费获得国外相关药品,最快 1 个工作日回馈药物信息

出境医 / 临床实验 / Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Surgery

Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Surgery

Study Description
Brief Summary:
Bariatric surgery has been widely used in the treatment of obesity in recent years. It has been shown to be effective in reaching the ideal weight and reducing obesity-induced comorbidities. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is defined as the first-step bariatric surgery for patients in the high surgical risk group. It has been shown that the laparoscopic approach has lower complication rates, shorter hospital stays, and earlier mobilization compared to open surgery. However, postoperative pain management is very important because it might cause major morbidity, especially pulmonary complications in the early postoperative period. The ultrasound (US) guided erector spina plane (ESP) block is a novel interfacial plan block defined by Forero et al. at 2016. ESP block provides thoracic analgesia at T5 level and abdominal analgesia at T7-9 level. In the literature, there is not still any randomized study evaluating ESP block efficiency for postoperative analgesia management after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy surgery.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Obesity Other: ESP block (Group ESP) Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

Prospective, Randomized Study Bariatric surgery has been widely used in the treatment of obesity in recent years. It has been shown to be effective in reaching the ideal weight and reducing obesity-induced comorbidities. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is defined as the first-step bariatric surgery for patients in the high surgical risk group. It has been shown that the laparoscopic approach has lower complication rates, shorter hospital stays, and earlier mobilization compared to open surgery. However, postoperative pain management is very important because it might cause major morbidity, especially pulmonary complications in the early postoperative period.

General recommendations for bariatric surgery include multimodal analgesia without sedatives, local analgesic infiltration, and early mobilization. Opioid analgesics are often preferred for pain management because of their strong analgesic potentials. However, opioids have undesirable adverse effects such as sedation, dizziness, constipation, nausea, vomiting, physical dependence and addiction, hyperalgesia, immunologic and hormonal dysfunction, muscle rigidity, tolerance, and respiratory depression. The morbidly obese patients treated with opioids experience increased risk for adverse effects such as atelectasis, which causes postoperative pulmonary complications, and obstructive sleep apnea, which causes hypoxemia, postoperative ileus and longer hospital stay due to nausea and vomiting. For this reason, in 2006, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) suggested minimizing or avoiding opioids during perioperative and/or postoperative pain management to the bariatric patients. Therefore, ASA recommends the use of multimodal analgesia including local anesthesia, regional anesthesia and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

The ultrasound (US) guided erector spina plane (ESP) block is a novel interfacial plan block defined by Forero et al. at 2016. ESP block provides thoracic analgesia at T5 level and abdominal analgesia at T7-9 level. The ESP block contains a local anesthetic injection into the deep fascia of erector spinae. This area is away from the pleural and neurological structures and thus minimizes the risk of complications due to injury. Visualization of sonoanatomy with US is easy, and the spread of local anesthesic agents can be easily seen under the erector spinae muscle. Thus, analgesia occurs in several dermatomes with cephalad-caudad way. Cadaveric studies have shown that the injection spreads to the ventral and dorsal roots of the spinal nerves and creates sensory blockade in both posterior and anterolateral thorax. In the literature, it has been reported that ESP block provides effective analgesia after ventral hernia repair surgery in a randomized controlled study. In some case series and case reports it has been reported that ESP block provides effective analgesia after abdominal and bariatric surgeries. In the literature, there is not still any randomized study evaluating ESP block efficiency for postoperative analgesia management after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy surgery.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of US-guided ESP block for postoperative analgesia management following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. The primary aim is to compare postoperative opioid consumption and the secondary aim is to evaluate postoperative pain scores (VAS), adverse effects related with opioids (allergic reaction, nausea, vomiting).

Study Design
Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 60 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description: Fourty patients aged 18-65 years old with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II and scheduled for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy under general anesthesia will be included in this prospective randomized study. Patients with a history of bleeding diathesis, receiving anticoagulant treatment, known local anesthetics and opioid allergy, infection of the skin at the site of the needle puncture, pregnancy or lactation, and patients who do not accept the procedure will be excluded from the study. Randomization will be achieved using a randomizing computer program. Patients will be randomly divided into two groups (Group ESP = ESP group, Group C = Control group) including 20 patients each, before entering the operating room.
Masking: Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description: Outcomes Assessor will be blinded to the study
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: The Efficacy Of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block For Postoperative Analgesia Management Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Study
Actual Study Start Date : June 1, 2019
Estimated Primary Completion Date : December 30, 2020
Estimated Study Completion Date : December 30, 2020
Arms and Interventions
Arm Intervention/treatment
Active Comparator: Group ESP = ESP group
ESP block (Group ESP) will be performed in the preoperative block room. US probe will be placed longitudinally 2-3 cm lateral to the T7 transvers process. From superior to inferior; trapezius (upper), rhomboideus major (middle), erector spinae (lower) muscles will be visualized on the hyperechoic transverse process. The 22G, 50 mm block needle (Braun Stimuplex Ultra 360, Germany) will be inserted in a cranio caudal direction and then for correction of the needle 5 ml normal saline solution will be enjected into the erector spina muscle fascia (figure). Following confirmation of the correct position of the needle, a dose of 20 ml %0.25 bupivacaine was administered. The same procedure will be performed at the other site (totally 40 ml %0.25 bupivacaine).
Other: ESP block (Group ESP)
Patients will be administered paracetamol 1 gr IV every 8 hours in the postoperative period. The PCA device prepared with 10 mcg/ ml fentanyl will be attached to all patients with a protocol included 20 mcg bolus without infusion dose, 20 min lockout time and 4 hour limit.

No Intervention: Group C = Control group
Patients will be administered paracetamol 1 gr IV every 8 hours in the postoperative period. The PCA device prepared with 10 mcg/ ml fentanyl will be attached to all patients with a protocol included 20 mcg bolus without infusion dose, 20 min lockout time and 4 hour limit.
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Opioid consumption by the patients at postoperative 24 hours peirod [ Time Frame: Postoperative 24 hours ]
    Fentanyl using


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Postoperative pain scores [ Time Frame: Postoperative 24 hours period ]
    Postoperative pain assessment will be performed using the VAS score (0 = no pain, 10 = the most severe pain felt). The VAS scores at rest and during cough will be recorded at postoperative 0, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 hours.


Eligibility Criteria
Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 65 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II
  • Scheduled for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy under general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bleeding diathesis
  • Receiving anticoagulant treatment
  • Known local anesthetics and opioid allergy
  • Infection of the skin at the site of the needle puncture
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Patients who do not accept the procedure
Contacts and Locations

Contacts
Layout table for location contacts
Contact: Bahadir Ciftci, Asist.Prof +905325034428 bciftci@medipol.edu.tr

Locations
Layout table for location information
Turkey
Istanbul Medipol University Hospital Recruiting
Istanbul, Bagcilar, Turkey, 34070
Contact: Bahadir Ciftci, MD    +905325034428    bciftci@medipol.edu.tr   
Contact: Mürsel Ekinci, MD    +905067137596    drmurselekinci@gmail.com   
Sponsors and Collaborators
Medipol University
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Bahadir Ciftci, Asist.Prof Medipol University
Tracking Information
First Submitted Date  ICMJE April 15, 2019
First Posted Date  ICMJE April 19, 2019
Last Update Posted Date September 1, 2020
Actual Study Start Date  ICMJE June 1, 2019
Estimated Primary Completion Date December 30, 2020   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Current Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: April 18, 2019)
Opioid consumption by the patients at postoperative 24 hours peirod [ Time Frame: Postoperative 24 hours ]
Fentanyl using
Original Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE Same as current
Change History
Current Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: April 18, 2019)
Postoperative pain scores [ Time Frame: Postoperative 24 hours period ]
Postoperative pain assessment will be performed using the VAS score (0 = no pain, 10 = the most severe pain felt). The VAS scores at rest and during cough will be recorded at postoperative 0, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 hours.
Original Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE Same as current
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
 
Descriptive Information
Brief Title  ICMJE Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Surgery
Official Title  ICMJE The Efficacy Of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block For Postoperative Analgesia Management Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Study
Brief Summary Bariatric surgery has been widely used in the treatment of obesity in recent years. It has been shown to be effective in reaching the ideal weight and reducing obesity-induced comorbidities. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is defined as the first-step bariatric surgery for patients in the high surgical risk group. It has been shown that the laparoscopic approach has lower complication rates, shorter hospital stays, and earlier mobilization compared to open surgery. However, postoperative pain management is very important because it might cause major morbidity, especially pulmonary complications in the early postoperative period. The ultrasound (US) guided erector spina plane (ESP) block is a novel interfacial plan block defined by Forero et al. at 2016. ESP block provides thoracic analgesia at T5 level and abdominal analgesia at T7-9 level. In the literature, there is not still any randomized study evaluating ESP block efficiency for postoperative analgesia management after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy surgery.
Detailed Description

Prospective, Randomized Study Bariatric surgery has been widely used in the treatment of obesity in recent years. It has been shown to be effective in reaching the ideal weight and reducing obesity-induced comorbidities. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is defined as the first-step bariatric surgery for patients in the high surgical risk group. It has been shown that the laparoscopic approach has lower complication rates, shorter hospital stays, and earlier mobilization compared to open surgery. However, postoperative pain management is very important because it might cause major morbidity, especially pulmonary complications in the early postoperative period.

General recommendations for bariatric surgery include multimodal analgesia without sedatives, local analgesic infiltration, and early mobilization. Opioid analgesics are often preferred for pain management because of their strong analgesic potentials. However, opioids have undesirable adverse effects such as sedation, dizziness, constipation, nausea, vomiting, physical dependence and addiction, hyperalgesia, immunologic and hormonal dysfunction, muscle rigidity, tolerance, and respiratory depression. The morbidly obese patients treated with opioids experience increased risk for adverse effects such as atelectasis, which causes postoperative pulmonary complications, and obstructive sleep apnea, which causes hypoxemia, postoperative ileus and longer hospital stay due to nausea and vomiting. For this reason, in 2006, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) suggested minimizing or avoiding opioids during perioperative and/or postoperative pain management to the bariatric patients. Therefore, ASA recommends the use of multimodal analgesia including local anesthesia, regional anesthesia and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

The ultrasound (US) guided erector spina plane (ESP) block is a novel interfacial plan block defined by Forero et al. at 2016. ESP block provides thoracic analgesia at T5 level and abdominal analgesia at T7-9 level. The ESP block contains a local anesthetic injection into the deep fascia of erector spinae. This area is away from the pleural and neurological structures and thus minimizes the risk of complications due to injury. Visualization of sonoanatomy with US is easy, and the spread of local anesthesic agents can be easily seen under the erector spinae muscle. Thus, analgesia occurs in several dermatomes with cephalad-caudad way. Cadaveric studies have shown that the injection spreads to the ventral and dorsal roots of the spinal nerves and creates sensory blockade in both posterior and anterolateral thorax. In the literature, it has been reported that ESP block provides effective analgesia after ventral hernia repair surgery in a randomized controlled study. In some case series and case reports it has been reported that ESP block provides effective analgesia after abdominal and bariatric surgeries. In the literature, there is not still any randomized study evaluating ESP block efficiency for postoperative analgesia management after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy surgery.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of US-guided ESP block for postoperative analgesia management following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. The primary aim is to compare postoperative opioid consumption and the secondary aim is to evaluate postoperative pain scores (VAS), adverse effects related with opioids (allergic reaction, nausea, vomiting).

Study Type  ICMJE Interventional
Study Phase  ICMJE Not Applicable
Study Design  ICMJE Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Fourty patients aged 18-65 years old with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II and scheduled for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy under general anesthesia will be included in this prospective randomized study. Patients with a history of bleeding diathesis, receiving anticoagulant treatment, known local anesthetics and opioid allergy, infection of the skin at the site of the needle puncture, pregnancy or lactation, and patients who do not accept the procedure will be excluded from the study. Randomization will be achieved using a randomizing computer program. Patients will be randomly divided into two groups (Group ESP = ESP group, Group C = Control group) including 20 patients each, before entering the operating room.
Masking: Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
Outcomes Assessor will be blinded to the study
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Condition  ICMJE Obesity
Intervention  ICMJE Other: ESP block (Group ESP)
Patients will be administered paracetamol 1 gr IV every 8 hours in the postoperative period. The PCA device prepared with 10 mcg/ ml fentanyl will be attached to all patients with a protocol included 20 mcg bolus without infusion dose, 20 min lockout time and 4 hour limit.
Study Arms  ICMJE
  • Active Comparator: Group ESP = ESP group
    ESP block (Group ESP) will be performed in the preoperative block room. US probe will be placed longitudinally 2-3 cm lateral to the T7 transvers process. From superior to inferior; trapezius (upper), rhomboideus major (middle), erector spinae (lower) muscles will be visualized on the hyperechoic transverse process. The 22G, 50 mm block needle (Braun Stimuplex Ultra 360, Germany) will be inserted in a cranio caudal direction and then for correction of the needle 5 ml normal saline solution will be enjected into the erector spina muscle fascia (figure). Following confirmation of the correct position of the needle, a dose of 20 ml %0.25 bupivacaine was administered. The same procedure will be performed at the other site (totally 40 ml %0.25 bupivacaine).
    Intervention: Other: ESP block (Group ESP)
  • No Intervention: Group C = Control group
    Patients will be administered paracetamol 1 gr IV every 8 hours in the postoperative period. The PCA device prepared with 10 mcg/ ml fentanyl will be attached to all patients with a protocol included 20 mcg bolus without infusion dose, 20 min lockout time and 4 hour limit.
Publications *
  • Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.
  • Chin KJ, Malhas L, Perlas A. The Erector Spinae Plane Block Provides Visceral Abdominal Analgesia in Bariatric Surgery: A Report of 3 Cases. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 May/Jun;42(3):372-376. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000581.
  • Chin KJ, Adhikary S, Sarwani N, Forero M. The analgesic efficacy of pre-operative bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks in patients having ventral hernia repair. Anaesthesia. 2017 Apr;72(4):452-460. doi: 10.1111/anae.13814. Epub 2017 Feb 11.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruitment Information
Recruitment Status  ICMJE Recruiting
Estimated Enrollment  ICMJE
 (submitted: December 3, 2019)
60
Original Estimated Enrollment  ICMJE
 (submitted: April 18, 2019)
40
Estimated Study Completion Date  ICMJE December 30, 2020
Estimated Primary Completion Date December 30, 2020   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Eligibility Criteria  ICMJE

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II
  • Scheduled for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy under general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bleeding diathesis
  • Receiving anticoagulant treatment
  • Known local anesthetics and opioid allergy
  • Infection of the skin at the site of the needle puncture
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Patients who do not accept the procedure
Sex/Gender  ICMJE
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
Ages  ICMJE 18 Years to 65 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers  ICMJE No
Contacts  ICMJE
Contact: Bahadir Ciftci, Asist.Prof +905325034428 bciftci@medipol.edu.tr
Listed Location Countries  ICMJE Turkey
Removed Location Countries  
 
Administrative Information
NCT Number  ICMJE NCT03921970
Other Study ID Numbers  ICMJE Medipol Mega Hospital
Has Data Monitoring Committee No
U.S. FDA-regulated Product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
IPD Sharing Statement  ICMJE
Plan to Share IPD: No
Plan Description: Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared
Responsible Party Bahadir Ciftci, Medipol University
Study Sponsor  ICMJE Medipol University
Collaborators  ICMJE Not Provided
Investigators  ICMJE
Principal Investigator: Bahadir Ciftci, Asist.Prof Medipol University
PRS Account Medipol University
Verification Date August 2020

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP