4006-776-356 出国就医服务电话

免费获得国外相关药品,最快 1 个工作日回馈药物信息

出境医 / 临床实验 / Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation for Patients With Mild Alzheimer's Disease (TRANSFORM-AD)

Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation for Patients With Mild Alzheimer's Disease (TRANSFORM-AD)

Study Description
Brief Summary:
The goal of this study is to explore the efficacy and safety of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) in patients with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD). The study will recruit 40 individuals with mild AD with evidence of amyloid plaques in the brain through Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging. Participants will undergo baseline cognitive assessment, structural and functional MRI characterization, PiB-PET, and resting-state EEG measurement. The participants will be randomized to either a tACS group or a sham stimulation group. At the end of the intervention and 3-month follow-up, all subjects will repeat the baseline assessments.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Alzheimer Disease Device: transcranial alternating current stimulation Device: sham stimulation Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most prevalent cause of dementia. Given the limited efficacy of pharmacological treatments, non-pharmacological approaches in AD are of great interest. In these approaches, brain stimulation technique is an important one, because of its potential to modulate cognitive functions in many neuropsychiatric diseases. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), as a neuromodulatory technique, oscillates a sinusoidal current at a chosen frequency to interact with the brain's natural cortical oscillations. Hypothetically, tACS would reduce cortical hyperactivity and induces cognitive improvement or delay cognitive decline in patients with AD.

Objectives This double-blinded, randomized controlled trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of tACS in patients with mild AD. The second objective is to evaluate the effect of tACS on neural plasticity, which is assessed by structural and functional MRI, PiB-PET, and resting-state EEG.

Patients and Methods The proposed study is a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial that will include 40 individuals with mild AD with positive findings in amyloid PET imaging or amyloid protein levels in CSF. The participants will be randomized to either a tACS group or a sham stimulation group. Both groups will undergo 30 one-hour sessions in 3 weeks (21 days). All the outcomes will be assessed at baseline, end of intervention and 3 months after the first intervention to measure long-term resilience of the effect.

Study Design
Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 40 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: The Effects of TRanscranial AlterNating Current Stimulation FOR Patients With Mild Alzheimer's Disease (TRANSFORM-AD Study): A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Actual Study Start Date : September 11, 2019
Estimated Primary Completion Date : October 2021
Estimated Study Completion Date : December 2021
Arms and Interventions
Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: tACS stimulation group
NEXALIN ADI transcranial alternating current stimulator
Device: transcranial alternating current stimulation
The alternating current is administered through medical grade conductive pads that are produced specifically for the Nexalin technology. The pads are places on the forehead and behind each ear, and are connected to the Nexalin device with thin cables. Intervention will be implemented with a tACS device with gamma-frequency (40 Hz) and a peak-to-peak amplitude of 15mA, 30 one-hour sessions in 3 weeks (21 days).

Sham Comparator: sham stimulation group
Sham stimulator provided by NEXALIN company
Device: sham stimulation
Electrodes will also be put on patient's forehead and behind each ear. The sham stimulator has the exactly same appearance with the true stimulator. Participants and operators cannot determine whether the stimulator is true based on its appearance or patients' feelings. However, when the device is started, no current flows through the electrodes. Participants in this controlled group will also receive sham stimulations with 30 one-hour sessions in 21 days.

Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Change in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog, 11-items version). [ Time Frame: up to 21 days (end of intervention) ]
    ADAS-cog 11 scale ranges from 0 to 70, and higher value represents a worse outcome. This study will use ADAS-cog to assess changes in the global cognitive function after intervention.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Change in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog, 11-items version). [ Time Frame: 3 months ]
    ADAS-cog 11 scale ranges from 0 to 70, and higher value represents a worse outcome. This study will use ADAS-cog to assess changes in the global cognitive function after intervention.

  2. Change in brain volume and white matter integrity [ Time Frame: up to 21 days (end of intervention), 3 months ]
    Structural MRI will be used to measure brain volume and white matter integrity.

  3. Change in brain connectivity [ Time Frame: up to 21 days (end of intervention), 3 months ]
    Functional MRI and resting-state EEG will be used to measure brain connectivity.

  4. Change in amyloid deposit in brain [ Time Frame: up to 21 days (end of intervention) ]
    PiB-PET will be used to analyze the amyloid deposit in brain.

  5. Change in Mini-mental State Examination [ Time Frame: up to 21 days (end of intervention), 3 months ]
    Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) will be used to evaluate the general cognitive function. MMSE ranges from 0 to 30, and higher value represents a better outcome.

  6. Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment [ Time Frame: up to 21 days (end of intervention), 3 months ]
    Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) will be used to evaluate the general cognitive function. MoCA ranges from 0 to 30, and higher value represents a better outcome.

  7. Change in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale sum of the boxes [ Time Frame: up to 21 days (end of intervention), 3 months ]
    Clinical Dementia Rating Scale sum of the boxes (CDR-SB) will be used to evaluate the general cognitive function. CDR-SB ranges from 0 to 18, and higher value represents a worse outcome.

  8. Change in memory function [ Time Frame: up to 21 days (end of intervention), 3 months ]
    WHO-UCLA Auditory Verbal Learning Test will be used to assess memory function. It ranges from 0 to 45, and higher value represents a better outcome.

  9. Change in Digit span forward [ Time Frame: up to 21 days (end of intervention), 3 months ]
    Digit span will be used to assess attention. It ranges from 3 to 10, and higher value represents a better outcome.

  10. Change in Digit span backward [ Time Frame: up to 21 days (end of intervention), 3 months ]
    Digit span backward will be used to assess executive function. It ranges from 2 to 8, and higher value represents a better outcome.

  11. Change in Trail Making Test [ Time Frame: up to 21 days (end of intervention), 3 months ]
    Trail-Making Test B minus A score will be used to assess executive function. Trail-Making Test B minus A ranges from -150 to 300, higher value represents a worse outcome.

  12. Change in Boston Naming Test [ Time Frame: up to 21 days (end of intervention), 3 months ]
    Boston Naming Test will be used to assess language function. It ranges from 0 to 30, and higher value represents a better outcome.

  13. Change in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) [ Time Frame: up to 21 days (end of intervention), 3 months ]
    The Neuropsychiatric Inventory will be used to measure neuropsychiatric symptoms. It ranges from 0 to 144, and higher value represents a worse outcome.

  14. Change in Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) [ Time Frame: up to 21 days (end of intervention), 3 months ]
    The Geriatric Depression Scale will be used to measure neuropsychiatric symptoms. It ranges from 0 to 30, and higher value represents a worse outcome.

  15. Change in Activities of Daily Living [ Time Frame: up to 21 days (end of intervention), 3 months ]
    Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale will be used to assess the change of life quality. It ranges from 20 to 80. The "20" represents normal life ability and the higher score presents the worse life ability.

  16. Side-effects of tACS [ Time Frame: up to 21 days (end of intervention), 3 months ]
    Adverse Events as a result of tACS stimulation will be reported.


Eligibility Criteria
Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   45 Years to 75 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion criteria

  1. Subjects with informed consent;
  2. 45-75 years of age;
  3. At least 6 years of education;
  4. AD according to the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) guidelines;
  5. Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR)=1.0;
  6. Positive findings in amyloid PET imaging or decreased CSF levels of Aβ1-42;
  7. On a stable dose of cholinesterase inhibitors (e.g. donepezil or rivastigmine) as defined as 6 consecutive weeks of treatment at an unchanging dose, and without any intentions to modify the dosage during the observation period.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Current or past history of any neurological disorder other than dementia, such as epilepsy, stroke, progressive neurologic disease (e.g. multiple sclerosis), poorly controlled migraines or intracranial brain lesions; and history of previous neurosurgery or head trauma that resulted in residual neurologic impairment;
  2. Contraindication for undergoing MRI or receiving tACS;
  3. Eczema or sensitive skin;
  4. Familial AD;
  5. Depression or other psychiatric disorders;
  6. Abnormal brain structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, including hydrocephalus, stroke, structural lesions, etc. that would potentially confound the outcome;
  7. Severe cardiovascular/pulmonary disorders;
  8. Other conditions, in the investigator's opinion, might not be suitable for the study.
Contacts and Locations

Contacts
Layout table for location contacts
Contact: Yi Tang, M.D., Ph.D. 00861083199456 tangyixw@vip.163.com
Contact: Yi Xing, M.D. 008613269627589 xingyi_211@163.com

Locations
Layout table for location information
China
Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University Recruiting
Beijing, China, 100053
Contact: Yi Tang, M.D., Ph.D.    00861083199456    tangyixw@vip.163.com   
Contact: Yi Xing, M.D.    008613269627589    xingyi_211@163.com   
Sponsors and Collaborators
Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Yi Tang, M.D., Ph.D. Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing
Tracking Information
First Submitted Date  ICMJE February 26, 2019
First Posted Date  ICMJE April 19, 2019
Last Update Posted Date April 9, 2021
Actual Study Start Date  ICMJE September 11, 2019
Estimated Primary Completion Date October 2021   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Current Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: August 5, 2019)
Change in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog, 11-items version). [ Time Frame: up to 21 days (end of intervention) ]
ADAS-cog 11 scale ranges from 0 to 70, and higher value represents a worse outcome. This study will use ADAS-cog to assess changes in the global cognitive function after intervention.
Original Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: April 17, 2019)
Change in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog, 13-items version). [ Time Frame: up to 80 days (end of intervention) ]
ADAS-cog 13 scale ranges from 0 to 80, and higher value represents a worse outcome. This study will use ADAS-cog to assess changes in the global cognitive function after intervention.
Change History
Current Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: December 26, 2019)
  • Change in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog, 11-items version). [ Time Frame: 3 months ]
    ADAS-cog 11 scale ranges from 0 to 70, and higher value represents a worse outcome. This study will use ADAS-cog to assess changes in the global cognitive function after intervention.
  • Change in brain volume and white matter integrity [ Time Frame: up to 21 days (end of intervention), 3 months ]
    Structural MRI will be used to measure brain volume and white matter integrity.
  • Change in brain connectivity [ Time Frame: up to 21 days (end of intervention), 3 months ]
    Functional MRI and resting-state EEG will be used to measure brain connectivity.
  • Change in amyloid deposit in brain [ Time Frame: up to 21 days (end of intervention) ]
    PiB-PET will be used to analyze the amyloid deposit in brain.
  • Change in Mini-mental State Examination [ Time Frame: up to 21 days (end of intervention), 3 months ]
    Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) will be used to evaluate the general cognitive function. MMSE ranges from 0 to 30, and higher value represents a better outcome.
  • Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment [ Time Frame: up to 21 days (end of intervention), 3 months ]
    Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) will be used to evaluate the general cognitive function. MoCA ranges from 0 to 30, and higher value represents a better outcome.
  • Change in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale sum of the boxes [ Time Frame: up to 21 days (end of intervention), 3 months ]
    Clinical Dementia Rating Scale sum of the boxes (CDR-SB) will be used to evaluate the general cognitive function. CDR-SB ranges from 0 to 18, and higher value represents a worse outcome.
  • Change in memory function [ Time Frame: up to 21 days (end of intervention), 3 months ]
    WHO-UCLA Auditory Verbal Learning Test will be used to assess memory function. It ranges from 0 to 45, and higher value represents a better outcome.
  • Change in Digit span forward [ Time Frame: up to 21 days (end of intervention), 3 months ]
    Digit span will be used to assess attention. It ranges from 3 to 10, and higher value represents a better outcome.
  • Change in Digit span backward [ Time Frame: up to 21 days (end of intervention), 3 months ]
    Digit span backward will be used to assess executive function. It ranges from 2 to 8, and higher value represents a better outcome.
  • Change in Trail Making Test [ Time Frame: up to 21 days (end of intervention), 3 months ]
    Trail-Making Test B minus A score will be used to assess executive function. Trail-Making Test B minus A ranges from -150 to 300, higher value represents a worse outcome.
  • Change in Boston Naming Test [ Time Frame: up to 21 days (end of intervention), 3 months ]
    Boston Naming Test will be used to assess language function. It ranges from 0 to 30, and higher value represents a better outcome.
  • Change in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) [ Time Frame: up to 21 days (end of intervention), 3 months ]
    The Neuropsychiatric Inventory will be used to measure neuropsychiatric symptoms. It ranges from 0 to 144, and higher value represents a worse outcome.
  • Change in Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) [ Time Frame: up to 21 days (end of intervention), 3 months ]
    The Geriatric Depression Scale will be used to measure neuropsychiatric symptoms. It ranges from 0 to 30, and higher value represents a worse outcome.
  • Change in Activities of Daily Living [ Time Frame: up to 21 days (end of intervention), 3 months ]
    Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale will be used to assess the change of life quality. It ranges from 20 to 80. The "20" represents normal life ability and the higher score presents the worse life ability.
  • Side-effects of tACS [ Time Frame: up to 21 days (end of intervention), 3 months ]
    Adverse Events as a result of tACS stimulation will be reported.
Original Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: April 17, 2019)
  • Change in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog, 13-items version). [ Time Frame: 6 months ]
    ADAS-cog 13 scale ranges from 0 to 80, and higher value represents a worse outcome. This study will use ADAS-cog to assess changes in the global cognitive function after intervention.
  • Change in brain volume and white matter integrity [ Time Frame: up to 80 days (end of intervention), 6 months ]
    Structural MRI (including DTI) will be used to measure brain volume and white matter integrity.
  • Change in brain connectivity [ Time Frame: up to 80 days (end of intervention), 6 months ]
    Functional MRI and resting-state EEG will be used to measure brain connectivity.
  • Change in amyloid deposit in brain [ Time Frame: up to 80 days (end of intervention), 6 months ]
    PiB-PET will be used to analyze the amyloid deposit in brain.
  • Change in Mini-mental State Examination [ Time Frame: up to 80 days (end of intervention), 6 months ]
    Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) will be used to evaluate the general cognitive function. MMSE ranges from 0 to 30, and higher value represents a better outcome.
  • Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment [ Time Frame: up to 80 days (end of intervention), 6 months ]
    Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) will be used to evaluate the general cognitive function. MoCA ranges from 0 to 30, and higher value represents a better outcome.
  • Change in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale sum of the boxes [ Time Frame: up to 80 days (end of intervention), 6 months ]
    Clinical Dementia Rating Scale sum of the boxes (CDR-SB) will be used to evaluate the general cognitive function. CDR-SB ranges from 0 to 18, and higher value represents a worse outcome.
  • Change in memory function [ Time Frame: up to 80 days (end of intervention), 6 months ]
    WHO-UCLA Auditory Verbal Learning Test will be used to assess memory function. It ranges from 0 to 45, and higher value represents a better outcome.
  • Change in Digit span forward [ Time Frame: up to 80 days (end of intervention), 6 months ]
    Digit span will be used to assess attention. It ranges from 3 to 10, and higher value represents a better outcome.
  • Change in Digit span backward [ Time Frame: up to 80 days (end of intervention), 6 months ]
    Digit span backward will be used to assess executive function. It ranges from 2 to 8, and higher value represents a better outcome.
  • Change in Trail Making Test [ Time Frame: up to 80 days (end of intervention), 6 months ]
    Trail-Making Test B minus A score will be used to assess executive function. Trail-Making Test B minus A ranges from -150 to 300, higher value represents a worse outcome.
  • Change in Boston Naming Test [ Time Frame: up to 80 days (end of intervention), 6 months ]
    Boston Naming Test will be used to assess language function. It ranges from 0 to 30, and higher value represents a better outcome.
  • Change in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) [ Time Frame: up to 80 days (end of intervention), 6 months ]
    The Neuropsychiatric Inventory will be used to measure neuropsychiatric symptoms. It ranges from 0 to 144, and higher value represents a worse outcome.
  • Change in Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) [ Time Frame: up to 80 days (end of intervention), 6 months ]
    The Geriatric Depression Scale will be used to measure neuropsychiatric symptoms. It ranges from 0 to 30, and higher value represents a worse outcome.
  • Change in Activities of Daily Living [ Time Frame: up to 80 days (end of intervention), 6 months ]
    Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale will be used to assess the change of life quality. It ranges from 20 to 80. The "20" represents normal life ability and the higher score presents the worse life ability.
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
 
Descriptive Information
Brief Title  ICMJE Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation for Patients With Mild Alzheimer's Disease (TRANSFORM-AD)
Official Title  ICMJE The Effects of TRanscranial AlterNating Current Stimulation FOR Patients With Mild Alzheimer's Disease (TRANSFORM-AD Study): A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Brief Summary The goal of this study is to explore the efficacy and safety of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) in patients with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD). The study will recruit 40 individuals with mild AD with evidence of amyloid plaques in the brain through Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging. Participants will undergo baseline cognitive assessment, structural and functional MRI characterization, PiB-PET, and resting-state EEG measurement. The participants will be randomized to either a tACS group or a sham stimulation group. At the end of the intervention and 3-month follow-up, all subjects will repeat the baseline assessments.
Detailed Description

Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most prevalent cause of dementia. Given the limited efficacy of pharmacological treatments, non-pharmacological approaches in AD are of great interest. In these approaches, brain stimulation technique is an important one, because of its potential to modulate cognitive functions in many neuropsychiatric diseases. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), as a neuromodulatory technique, oscillates a sinusoidal current at a chosen frequency to interact with the brain's natural cortical oscillations. Hypothetically, tACS would reduce cortical hyperactivity and induces cognitive improvement or delay cognitive decline in patients with AD.

Objectives This double-blinded, randomized controlled trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of tACS in patients with mild AD. The second objective is to evaluate the effect of tACS on neural plasticity, which is assessed by structural and functional MRI, PiB-PET, and resting-state EEG.

Patients and Methods The proposed study is a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial that will include 40 individuals with mild AD with positive findings in amyloid PET imaging or amyloid protein levels in CSF. The participants will be randomized to either a tACS group or a sham stimulation group. Both groups will undergo 30 one-hour sessions in 3 weeks (21 days). All the outcomes will be assessed at baseline, end of intervention and 3 months after the first intervention to measure long-term resilience of the effect.

Study Type  ICMJE Interventional
Study Phase  ICMJE Not Applicable
Study Design  ICMJE Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Condition  ICMJE Alzheimer Disease
Intervention  ICMJE
  • Device: transcranial alternating current stimulation
    The alternating current is administered through medical grade conductive pads that are produced specifically for the Nexalin technology. The pads are places on the forehead and behind each ear, and are connected to the Nexalin device with thin cables. Intervention will be implemented with a tACS device with gamma-frequency (40 Hz) and a peak-to-peak amplitude of 15mA, 30 one-hour sessions in 3 weeks (21 days).
  • Device: sham stimulation
    Electrodes will also be put on patient's forehead and behind each ear. The sham stimulator has the exactly same appearance with the true stimulator. Participants and operators cannot determine whether the stimulator is true based on its appearance or patients' feelings. However, when the device is started, no current flows through the electrodes. Participants in this controlled group will also receive sham stimulations with 30 one-hour sessions in 21 days.
Study Arms  ICMJE
  • Experimental: tACS stimulation group
    NEXALIN ADI transcranial alternating current stimulator
    Intervention: Device: transcranial alternating current stimulation
  • Sham Comparator: sham stimulation group
    Sham stimulator provided by NEXALIN company
    Intervention: Device: sham stimulation
Publications * Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruitment Information
Recruitment Status  ICMJE Recruiting
Estimated Enrollment  ICMJE
 (submitted: April 17, 2019)
40
Original Estimated Enrollment  ICMJE Same as current
Estimated Study Completion Date  ICMJE December 2021
Estimated Primary Completion Date October 2021   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Eligibility Criteria  ICMJE

Inclusion criteria

  1. Subjects with informed consent;
  2. 45-75 years of age;
  3. At least 6 years of education;
  4. AD according to the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) guidelines;
  5. Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR)=1.0;
  6. Positive findings in amyloid PET imaging or decreased CSF levels of Aβ1-42;
  7. On a stable dose of cholinesterase inhibitors (e.g. donepezil or rivastigmine) as defined as 6 consecutive weeks of treatment at an unchanging dose, and without any intentions to modify the dosage during the observation period.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Current or past history of any neurological disorder other than dementia, such as epilepsy, stroke, progressive neurologic disease (e.g. multiple sclerosis), poorly controlled migraines or intracranial brain lesions; and history of previous neurosurgery or head trauma that resulted in residual neurologic impairment;
  2. Contraindication for undergoing MRI or receiving tACS;
  3. Eczema or sensitive skin;
  4. Familial AD;
  5. Depression or other psychiatric disorders;
  6. Abnormal brain structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, including hydrocephalus, stroke, structural lesions, etc. that would potentially confound the outcome;
  7. Severe cardiovascular/pulmonary disorders;
  8. Other conditions, in the investigator's opinion, might not be suitable for the study.
Sex/Gender  ICMJE
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
Ages  ICMJE 45 Years to 75 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers  ICMJE No
Contacts  ICMJE
Contact: Yi Tang, M.D., Ph.D. 00861083199456 tangyixw@vip.163.com
Contact: Yi Xing, M.D. 008613269627589 xingyi_211@163.com
Listed Location Countries  ICMJE China
Removed Location Countries  
 
Administrative Information
NCT Number  ICMJE NCT03920826
Other Study ID Numbers  ICMJE 2018077-XZ1
Has Data Monitoring Committee Not Provided
U.S. FDA-regulated Product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
IPD Sharing Statement  ICMJE Not Provided
Responsible Party Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing
Study Sponsor  ICMJE Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing
Collaborators  ICMJE Not Provided
Investigators  ICMJE
Principal Investigator: Yi Tang, M.D., Ph.D. Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing
PRS Account Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing
Verification Date June 2020

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP