Orotracheal extubation consists in the removal of the endotracheal tube (ETT) when it is no longer required. This procedure may carry a considerable risk of complications and extubation failure. The literature points out two methods of extubation: the traditional method and the positive pressure method.
In a noninferiority clinical trial it was demonstrated that EOT with positive pressure and without endotracheal suction was a safe technique and could be better than traditional extubation. Although prior studies reported better clinical outcomes with the positive pressure extubation technique, its superiority has not been deeply studied yet. Therefore, the objective of our study is to determine whether the positive pressure OTE technique, compared with the traditional OTE technique, reduces the incidence of major postextubation complications (up to 60 minutes) in critically ill adult patients.
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Weaning Failure Mechanical Ventilation Complication | Procedure: Positive Pressure Extubation Technique Procedure: Traditional Extubation Technique | Not Applicable |
Design: Multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial Methods: Critically ill adult subjects on invasive mechanical ventilation who met extubation criteria will be included. Will be randomly assigned to positive-pressure extubation (n=389) or to traditional extubation (n=389).
The main variable will be incidence of major complications.
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Actual Enrollment : | 725 participants |
| Allocation: | Randomized |
| Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
| Intervention Model Description: | superiority |
| Masking: | Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) |
| Masking Description: | Due to the nature of the intervention, blinding of the subject and the operators responsible for extubation is not possible. The person in charge of data statistical analysis and the evaluator who assess and record outcome measures will be blinded to the allocated intervention. |
| Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
| Official Title: | Comparison of Two Extubation Techniques in Critically Ill Adult Patients (ExtubAR Trial): Randomized Clinical Trial |
| Actual Study Start Date : | April 1, 2019 |
| Actual Primary Completion Date : | March 26, 2020 |
| Actual Study Completion Date : | March 26, 2020 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Positive Pressure Extubation Technique
ETT is removed in PSV 15/10 mode and without endotracheal suction.
|
Procedure: Positive Pressure Extubation Technique
Positive-pressure extubation is performed by only one operator. Ventilator parameters are set to pressure support ventilation mode, with an inspiratory pressure of 15 cm H2O and PEEP of 10 cm H2O. Then, the cuff is deflated, and the ETT is removed without endotracheal suction. Once the ETT is removed, a suction catheter is introduced through the mouth to suction secretions drawn to the oropharynx by the air flow from the ventilator passing between the ETT and the larynx.
|
|
Active Comparator: Traditional Extubation Technique
ETT is removed with continuous endotracheal suction
|
Procedure: Traditional Extubation Technique
Traditional extubation is performed by 2 operators. Without reconnection to the ventilator, the closed suction system catheter is introduced by one of the operators into the ETT and suctioning is initiated. The cuff is immediately deflated by the other operator, and the ETT is removed with continuous endotracheal suction during the whole procedure by the first operator.
|
Clinical evidence of at least one of the following:
Clinical evidence of at least one of the following:
Clinical evidence of at least one of the following:
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
| Argentina | |
| Hospital Santojanni | |
| Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1408 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Mauro F Andreu, Prof | Hospital Santojanni |
| Tracking Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Submitted Date ICMJE | April 14, 2019 | ||||
| First Posted Date ICMJE | April 18, 2019 | ||||
| Results First Submitted Date ICMJE | December 28, 2020 | ||||
| Results First Posted Date ICMJE | February 9, 2021 | ||||
| Last Update Posted Date | February 9, 2021 | ||||
| Actual Study Start Date ICMJE | April 1, 2019 | ||||
| Actual Primary Completion Date | March 26, 2020 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Number of Participants With Major Post Extubation Complications [ Time Frame: Within15 minutes after extubation. ] Clinical evidence of at least one of the following:
|
||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Incidence of post extubation major complication [ Time Frame: Within15 minutes after extubation. ] Clinical evidence of at least one of the following:
|
||||
| Change History | |||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||
| Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||
| Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Comparison of Two Extubation Techniques in Critically Ill Adult Patients | ||||
| Official Title ICMJE | Comparison of Two Extubation Techniques in Critically Ill Adult Patients (ExtubAR Trial): Randomized Clinical Trial | ||||
| Brief Summary |
Orotracheal extubation consists in the removal of the endotracheal tube (ETT) when it is no longer required. This procedure may carry a considerable risk of complications and extubation failure. The literature points out two methods of extubation: the traditional method and the positive pressure method. In a noninferiority clinical trial it was demonstrated that EOT with positive pressure and without endotracheal suction was a safe technique and could be better than traditional extubation. Although prior studies reported better clinical outcomes with the positive pressure extubation technique, its superiority has not been deeply studied yet. Therefore, the objective of our study is to determine whether the positive pressure OTE technique, compared with the traditional OTE technique, reduces the incidence of major postextubation complications (up to 60 minutes) in critically ill adult patients. |
||||
| Detailed Description |
Design: Multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial Methods: Critically ill adult subjects on invasive mechanical ventilation who met extubation criteria will be included. Will be randomly assigned to positive-pressure extubation (n=389) or to traditional extubation (n=389). The main variable will be incidence of major complications. |
||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
| Study Phase ICMJE | Not Applicable | ||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Intervention Model Description: superiority Masking: Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)Masking Description: Due to the nature of the intervention, blinding of the subject and the operators responsible for extubation is not possible. The person in charge of data statistical analysis and the evaluator who assess and record outcome measures will be blinded to the allocated intervention. Primary Purpose: Treatment
|
||||
| Condition ICMJE |
|
||||
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||
| Study Arms ICMJE |
|
||||
| Publications * |
|
||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Terminated | ||||
| Actual Enrollment ICMJE |
725 | ||||
| Original Estimated Enrollment ICMJE |
778 | ||||
| Actual Study Completion Date ICMJE | March 26, 2020 | ||||
| Actual Primary Completion Date | March 26, 2020 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
| Sex/Gender ICMJE |
|
||||
| Ages ICMJE | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) | ||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE | No | ||||
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||
| Listed Location Countries ICMJE | Argentina | ||||
| Removed Location Countries | |||||
| Administrative Information | |||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT03918811 | ||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | 12-2018-05 | ||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||
| U.S. FDA-regulated Product |
|
||||
| IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE |
|
||||
| Responsible Party | Mauro Andreu, Hospital Donación Francisco Santojanni | ||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Hospital Donación Francisco Santojanni | ||||
| Collaborators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
| PRS Account | Hospital Donación Francisco Santojanni | ||||
| Verification Date | January 2021 | ||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||